28 semanas después backdrop
28 semanas después poster

28 SEMANAS DESPUÉS

28 Weeks Later

2007 GB HMDB
abril 26, 2007

Seis meses después de que la propagación del virus haya aniquilado las Islas Británicas, el ejército de los Estados Unidos declara que ha ganado la guerra contra la infección y que puede comenzar la reconstrucción del país. Con la primera ola de refugiados que vuelve al país, una familia consigue reencontrarse. Pero uno de los miembros guarda un terrible secreto sin ser consciente de ello. El virus aún no ha sido destruido y en esta ocasión, es más peligroso que nunca.

Reparto

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Equipo

Produccion: Alex Garland (Executive Producer)Danny Boyle (Executive Producer)Allon Reich (Producer)Enrique López Lavigne (Producer)Andrew Macdonald (Producer)Bernard Bellew (Producer)
Guion: Rowan Joffé (Screenplay)Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (Screenplay)Jesús Olmo (Screenplay)
Musica: John Murphy (Original Music Composer)
Fotografia: Enrique Chediak (Director of Photography)

RESEÑAS (1)

Luigi Scaramuzzi
Una terrible epidemia, causada por un virus letal, devastó la población de Gran Bretaña, diezmándola. Después de seis meses, el ejército estadounidense declaró que la lucha contra el virus había sido ganada y que finalmente podía comenzar la repoblación. Con el regreso de los refugiados, una familia se reúne, pero será solo el principio del fin. Sinceramente, era un poco difícil pensar en una segunda parte, dadas las proporciones de devastación reportadas en el famoso "28 días después" (2003). Danny Boyle nos dejó una Gran Bretaña completamente arrasada por la epidemia mortal causada por el virus transmitido por monos infectados con rabia, que transformaba a los seres humanos en asesinos despiadados y sedientos, no en zombis como a menudo se ha leído y dicho. Estas no son personas que en el momento del contagio caen al suelo sin vida y luego se levantan hambrientas, sino personas afectadas por la "rabia" (en todos los sentidos de la palabra) transmitida a través del contacto directo con la sangre infectada, que actúa en menos de 10 segundos. Ya no son capaces de pensar ni actuar y, por lo tanto, no pueden procurarse comida, lo que les lleva a la muerte. Obviamente, si estamos hablando de esto es porque algo no ha salido bien y un nuevo cepa del virus está a punto de desatarse. Esto se narra en la secuela "28 semanas después" de Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. La película, producida por Fox Atomic, cuenta con un elenco de respeto vinculado de alguna manera a Danny Boyle, padre y creador de la primera película. Con Robert Carlyle ("Trainspotting" y "Full Monty") y Rose Byrne ("Sunshine" y "Troy"). Es una mujer la última portadora del virus, una mujer que entró en contacto directo con un infectado, por una razón desconocida su organismo se adaptó al proceso de difusión, dándole una mutación, convirtiéndose en una portadora sana sin sufrir la transformación. Ahora es bastante fácil imaginar lo que ocurrirá, dado que estamos hablando de un infectado invisible y cuáles podrían ser las consecuencias que sufrirá Inglaterra y más precisamente la ciudad de Londres, que acaba de volver a esperar, repoblarse, revivir... sí, pero solo por poco tiempo. Los espectadores que quedaron decepcionados por la primera parte del director, que no había "documentado" la difusión del contagio partiendo directamente del después de los desastres del virus, serán capturados por el debutante director Fresnadillo, que muestra toda la difusión del contagio, el pánico, la desesperación, dejando así imaginar que probablemente ocurrió lo mismo en "28 días después". Algunas escenas son demasiado frenéticas y podrían molestar, pero luego te acostumbras al ritmo de la película que, por lo que está representando, no podía ser diferente (¿te imaginas escenas de pánico, histeria y muerte... representadas con plácida candidez? ¡). La tensión es excelente, especialmente la de espera mientras avanza lentamente el regreso a la normalidad, el miedo está presente (así como sangre y splatter) y es fuerte en algunos momentos. Una de las escenas es impresionante, con un famoso estadio de fútbol como escenario, así como otras que valdrían la pena mencionar. El final está abierto y ya se rumorea un "28 meses después" con Boyle nuevamente en la dirección. Digamos la verdad, estos infectados dan realmente miedo, incluso por las circunstancias relatadas en la película: un virus, uno como tantos otros, capaz de convertir a los seres humanos en asesinos... y si un día este virus tomara vida realmente? ¿Alguna vez lo han pensado? De todos modos, "28 semanas después" es una película digna de su predecesora y para algunos (estoy seguro) será incluso mejor... el resto es solo para ver.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Dónde Ver

Streaming

Disney Plus Disney Plus

Alquilar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision

Comprar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision

RESEÑAS DE LA COMUNIDAD (6)

Andres Gomez

4 /10

Much worse than the original. It loses quite of the continuous tension. Many of the FX are bad quality. The script is really predictable and some scenes and conversations are too much of a cliche.

talisencrw

8 /10

This was a very good sequel to a fine zombie work (my favourite zombie film is STILL Jean Rollin's remarkable and extremely aesthetically-pleasing 'The Grapes of Death'), and I was very pleasantly surprised. Pardon the pun, but you would think that by this time, everything in the land of zombie movies would have been done to death, but I remain consistently admiring of just where the best and most thought-out renditions of the template can go. In THIS case, the most intriguing dynamic is a cowardly husband choosing his life rather than helping his wife out of a horrible crisis, then infanticide (or worse) of his own children, rather than face their wrath over the poor decision he had made.

It's interestingly hilarious that when you think about it, humanity is doomed because a 12-year-old had to go back and get a picture of his mother, because he was afraid that without it, he would forget what she looked like...A surprisingly satisfying work, that for horror fans, is worth a purchase and rewatching. I'm admittedly more for classic films, from the 20's to 60's, but for contemporary horror cinema, I liked this a lot, especially Jeremy Renner and Imogen Poots. It's no surprise to me that they soon became superstars.

John Chard

John Chard

8 /10

We have an outbreak of the infection in medical center. All units; safeties off.

28 Weeks Later is directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo who also co-writes with Rowan Joffe, Jesus Olmo and E. L. Lavigne. It stars Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Harold Perrineau, Catherine McCormack, Mackintosh Muggleton and Imogen Poots. Music is by John Murphy and cinematography by Enrique Chediak.

Six months have passed since the Rage Virus decimated the UK, but now people are returning to London's District 1 with the U.S. Military overseeing the project. However, the Rage Virus can be carried in people with no outward symptoms.

After the monster success of "28 Days Later" it was inevitable that a sequel would follow. With director/writer combo Danny Boyle and Alex Garland off making "Sunshine" with Cillian Murphy, the big players from the first film were missing (Boyle and Garland were Executive Producers here). There was reasonable cause for some concern that this would be the latest in a long line of horror sequels that, quite frankly, suck the big one. How great to find that not only is "Weeks" an excellent sequel, it also doesn't sit idle and copy Boyle's winning formula.

The blood and ick factor is considerably amped up, as is the action (there's running, lots of running, guns, lots of guns, panic, lots of panic), but the writers have put intelligence into the writing by expanding on the Rage Virus victims as not just being an outwardly ferocious beast, and some topical smarts are spliced into the narrative with the presence of the American military "enforcing" the reconstruction of London. Also, with the film's central focus being on a splintered family, brilliantly set up by the breathtaking/horrifying opening 10 minutes, there's a mighty heft of humanism flowing in between the blood vomit and body shredding.

Cast are mostly terrific, with Carlyle and the impressive young actors, Poots and Muggleton, leading the way. The American lads playing military men have to make do with slender written stock roles, but Byrne provides spunk and McCormack leaves an indelible mark in a small, but key, role. Fresnadillo (Intacto) ensures Boyle isn't missed in the director's chair, with a keen eye for action construction and an awareness of pacing for such a horror movie. While Murphy again scores with that knack for doom mongering beats. There's some missteps, logic at times goes out the window and in the case of Renner's character, outcome is a bit too much of a bitter pill to swallow. While dialogue at times shops at "Clichés "R" Us". But this is still a mighty fine thrill ride, often scary and stomach turning, and even flecked with emotional worth. On this evidence a part 3 would be most welcome. 8/10

Gimly

Gimly

7 /10

The story is not quite up to snuff in comparison to Days, but the visual quality is way better.

Final rating:★★★½ - I really liked it. Would strongly recommend you give it your time.

Ricardo Oliveira

Ricardo Oliveira

7 /10

"28 Weeks Later" is a British horror movie directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and starring Jeremy Renner and Rose Byrne. The film is a sequel to the critically acclaimed "28 Days Later" and takes place six months after the original film's events.

The film opens with a tense and heart-pounding sequence as a group of survivors try to escape the infected hordes of London. The scene sets the tone for the rest of the movie, which is filled with suspense and tension.

The plot centers around the repopulation of London, which is deemed safe after the outbreak of the Rage Virus six months earlier. The story follows the reunion of a family that was separated during the initial outbreak, and their struggle to survive when the virus returns.

The film's pacing is excellent, with a gradual buildup of tension that leads to several heart-stopping moments. The infected humans are just as terrifying and violent as in the first film, and the film's use of sound and lighting is once again top-notch.

One of the standout features of "28 Weeks Later" is the excellent acting by Jeremy Renner and Rose Byrne. Renner delivers a convincing performance as Don, a father struggling to protect his children and come to terms with his actions during the initial outbreak. Byrne also shines as Scarlett, a medical officer trying to find a cure for the virus.

The film's themes of family, loyalty, and sacrifice are powerful and thought-provoking. As the family struggles to survive, they are forced to confront the difficult choices that come with the end of the world.

The film's cinematography and visual effects are also impressive, with haunting and memorable shots of a deserted London and intense action sequences.

Overall, "28 Weeks Later" is a solid horror movie that is not quite as groundbreaking as its predecessor but still delivers a thrilling and engaging experience. The film's excellent acting, pacing, and visuals make for an intense and unforgettable experience. I would rate "28 Weeks Later" an 7 out of 10.

Written and Reviewed by RSOliveira

r96sk

r96sk

6 /10

<em>'28 Weeks Later'</em> is passable in its own right for the majority, though the way it all concludes did disappoint me. I didn't care for the end all that much, which does damage how I view this unfortunately. Overall it fails to match the original, though does still offer OK post-apocalypse fare.

It is pretty strong in regards to the cast list, which is probably the only area that this can claim that it matches the predecessor (even if I prefer the 2002 cast, obvs). Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner and Idris Elba were people I was happy to see appear, while Robert Carlyle & Co. are solid.

The locations aren't as cool or convincing as last time out, though the effects for the infected are satisfactory. I can appreciate the idea that they had with this sequel, for the most part I was content with what I was watching. However, by the credits, it left me underwhelmed.

Reseñas proporcionadas por TMDB