The Amityville Horror backdrop
The Amityville Horror poster

THE AMITYVILLE HORROR

2005 • US HMDB
April 14, 2005

George Lutz, his wife Kathy, and their three children have just moved into a beautiful, and improbably cheap, Dutch colonial mansion nestled in the sleepy coastal town of Amityville, Long Island. However, their dream home is concealing a horrific past and soon each member of the Lutz family is plagued with increasingly strange and violent visions and impulses.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: David Crockett (Executive Producer)Andrew Form (Producer)Michael Bay (Producer)Ted Field (Executive Producer)Brad Fuller (Producer)
Screenplay: Sandor Stern (Screenplay)Scott Kosar (Screenplay)
Music: Steve Jablonsky (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Peter Lyons Collister (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Alessandro Carrara •
The Lutzes are an ordinary American family who, in the early 1970s, are looking for a new home. The opportunity of a lifetime presents itself in Long Island, in the form of an enormous late 17th-century mansion, for sale at an incredibly low price compared to the market value. George, the family's business-savvy patriarch, asks the nervous seller "where's the catch?", and then the woman explains (rather reluctantly) the reason why the house has remained unsold for so long: a year before, within those walls, the 23-year-old Ronald De Feo had exterminated his entire family with shotgun blasts, including his six-year-old sister. Since then, the house had acquired a sinister reputation in the neighborhood, after all "houses don't kill people, people kill other people". From the very first day of their residence, the new occupants of Amityville will discover, however, that sometimes even places can kill, or rather force people to do so… It seems that ideas for horror in Hollywood have run out: in the last two years we have witnessed a real invasion of remakes of the classics of the genre or of the more recent Japanese films. "The Amityville Horror" is the last film of this series released in theaters, but it certainly will not stay for long, since "Dark Water" with Jennifer Connelly is already on the horizon. It is certainly a good product, the direction and photography demonstrate a non-negligible quality, typical of films like "Non aprite quella porta" and "L'alba dei morti viventi", to the point that the harshest criticism that can be made to "Amityville Horror" is that it is an empty copy of its predecessor from 1979, to which it is, moreover, very faithful in reconstructing the settings in a sometimes overly pedantic manner, recreating the first half of the 1970s in cars and fashion, obviously filtered through the benevolent lens of our era… Note, however, a substantial difference between the original film and the current one, a characteristic already revealed in other recent remakes: the tendency to "upgrade" the characters, decidedly too attractive to be real, like the beautiful mother with a perfectly flat stomach after three pregnancies, the patriarch with a sculpted physique worthy of a perfume advertisement for a great designer, not to mention the drugged and semi-nude babysitter (but would you entrust your children to a girl with extremely tight jeans and only a silk band covering her breast?), and this together with the "Happy Days" reconstruction of the historical period produces a polished and unrealistic effect that may bother some viewers. Despite this, the level of acting is good for almost all the actors, in particular Philip Baker Hall, engaged in the secondary role of Father Callahan (curious… the same surname as the priest in King's novel "Salem's Lot", trivia or coincidence?) who reminds us a lot of the Max Von Sydow of his best times. In short, the problem does not seem to be so much of artistic quality as purely "aesthetic". Apart from this flaw, the film flows quickly and offers some moments of tension worthy of the predecessor, and the atmosphere seems to have been well captured, thanks above all to the choice of location, in Silver Lake, Wisconsin, where the sinister pre-colonial style villa was reconstructed, while most of the interiors were filmed in an abandoned building in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. By the way, the great fame of the original film came from the fact that, like other films of the time, it was presented as inspired by a real event: in reality, George and Kathy Lutz admitted in 1995 under oath that the story was pure fiction and that their action was a stratagem to launch the feature film. The same George Lutz has recently criticized the remake, especially for the fact that the authors refused his collaboration for the project. Despite this, it can certainly be stated that "The Amityville Horror" is the most successful remake of recent years, which does not pale in comparison to its illustrious predecessor, endowed with some memorable scenes, including the final sequence that gives a shiver to more than one viewer in the audience.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Amazon Video Amazon Video
Chili Chili

Buy

Amazon Video Amazon Video
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (1)

Wuchak

Wuchak

7 /10

Effective haunted house movie with Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George

A young couple with three children buys an old, large house on Long Island in 1975. The house has a diabolic history, but they purchase it anyway because it's such a great deal. Will they make it out alive?

I didn’t have high hopes for "The Amityville Horror" (2005) because I'm not a fan of haunted house movies and thus had not yet seen the original version. But I decided to give it a try due to Melissa George. The movie maintains a serious tone throughout and did not disappoint; it successfully piqued my interest in the whole Amityville Horror legend, which you can read about on the internet.

Some may accuse the film of ripping off aspects of "The Shining" (1980), but keep in mind that the original movie was released a year before "The Shining" while the books they were based on were both published in 1977. The difference is that “The Amityville Horror” was inspired by supposedly true events whereas Stephen King’s novel was purely fictional.

Of course this remake inspired me to see the classic version from 1979 with James Brolin and Margot Kidder. What I like about that one is that it takes its time to develop the characters in what is essentially a realistic drama topped off with creepy paranormal happenings. It addresses dark, ugly stuff but it actually has a warm heart (recall what George does in the final scene). This brisk 2005 remake is like the Reader’s Digest version, unsurprisingly upping the ante with the (clichéd) horror elements; it thankfully offers interesting details on the backstory of the house. I think they’re both worth checking out. If you prefer longer with more depth you’ll favor the original version whereas if you want something faster and more modern you’ll appreciate this one.

Melissa George is a gorgeous woman and I enjoy watching her. Also on hand on the feminine front is Rachel Nichols, who played Tamara in the 2011 redo of "Conan the Barbarian." Rachel plays a hippie chick babysitter and she's perfect for the role. The babysitter is haughty and scoffs at the diabolic history of the house but let's just say she leaves as a true believer. This was a great sequence that perked my interest at a time it needed it (as I was starting to get bored by that point). In any event, I had to reassess my appraisal of Ms. Nichols after seeing her in this film as she won my appreciation. Meanwhile Chloë Grace Moretz plays the little girl; she was only 7 when the film was shot.

Ryan Reynolds as the husband is fine, but he seems TOO in-shape for the role. However, I'm sure the ladies appreciate it.

The film runs 1 hour, 29 minutes, and was shot at Silver Lake and Salem, Wisconsin, with other parts filmed in the Chicago area of Illinois.

GRADE: B

Reviews provided by TMDB