Pride and Prejudice and Zombies backdrop
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies poster

PRIDE AND PREJUDICE AND ZOMBIES

2016 GB HMDB
February 4, 2016

A zombie outbreak has fallen upon the land in this reimagining of Jane Austen's classic tale of the tangled relationships between lovers from different social classes in 19th century England. Feisty heroine Elizabeth Bennet is a master of martial arts and weaponry and the handsome Mr. Darcy is a fierce zombie killer, yet the epitome of upper class prejudice. As the zombie outbreak intensifies, they must swallow their pride and join forces on the blood-soaked battlefield in order to conquer the undead once and for all.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Allison Shearmur (Producer)Edward H. Hamm Jr. (Executive Producer)Marc Butan (Executive Producer)Aleen Keshishian (Executive Producer)Annette Savitch (Producer)Sean McKittrick (Producer)Natalie Portman (Producer)Sue Baden-Powell (Executive Producer)David Borgenicht (Producer)Kimberly Fox (Executive Producer)Phil Hunt (Executive Producer)Stephen Meinen (Producer)Nick Meyer (Executive Producer)Brian Oliver (Producer)Compton Ross (Executive Producer)Lauren Selig (Executive Producer)Tyler Thompson (Producer)
Screenplay: Burr Steers (Screenplay)
Music: Fernando Velázquez (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Remi Adefarasin (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
19th century, England. A terrible pestilence is turning humans into putrid undead, and for this reason many are trained in self-defense from childhood. The noble Bennet family is no exception, whose five young daughters are taught martial arts. Among them stands out Elizabeth, whom her mother would like to marry to Mr. Darcy, a close friend of Mr. Bingley, to whom Elizabeth's older sister, Jane, is promised. Elizabeth is firmly against the marriage, although she values Darcy for his skills in killing zombies. But when the undead threat advances towards the city, the Bennet sisters and Darcy will have to set aside pride and prejudice to unite their forces against a common enemy. In 2009, the young writer/comic book writer/screenwriter Seth Grahame-Smith achieved editorial success with the novel "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies," in which, following the advice of his editor who suggested anchoring to something classic to avoid paying copyright fees, he made his own the famous work of Jane Austen and blended it with the current zombie craze. The success was such that the film was immediately optioned for a cinematic adaptation, which attracted the interest of actress Natalie Portman, as a producer. The film's production was particularly troubled, meanwhile Seth Grahame-Smith wrote a second novel "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter," which immediately became a film directed by Timur Bekmambetov and produced by Tim Burton. But in the end, "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" managed to reach the cinema under the direction of Burr Steers, who has a past as an actor for horror cinema ("Intruder – Faceless Terror") and for Tarantino ("Pulp Fiction" and "Reservoir Dogs") and as a director for the teen movie with Zac Efron "17 Again". "PPZ – Pride and Prejudice and Zombies," as the film is titled with an obvious wink to the blockbuster with Brad Pitt "WWZ," is a decidedly unsuccessful product because it fails to find the right balance between Austen and horror that Grahame-Smith had managed to convey in the novel. Let's start with an observation that in itself has a bit of the whole meaning of the operation and the reason for the "failure": "PPZ – Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" is a PG-13 and is made to primarily satisfy a teenage audience. We are absolutely not in the territory of the nefarious young adult trend, but, in some respects, Steers' film comes out almost as a complementary operation. After all, there is a lot of "Pride and Prejudice" and very little "Zombies" in this film, showing an imbalance in favor of the romantic dimension inherent in Austen's work, leaving the viewer who expected flesh-hungry undead with a dry mouth. The zombies are present, at times they have an even disturbing look (although the CGI corrections are not always pleasingly successful), unfortunately they have a sometimes mimetic behavior that generates confusion and shows indecision of intent, but that damned PG-13 ruins everything and makes the attempt to horrify a rather cloying pink story vain (that Austen from beyond does not hold it against us!). During the almost two hours of "PPZ – Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" not a single drop of blood flows, all the killings are out of frame and the blades of the swords, after impaling and cutting, are always shown unrealistically clean. And this, in the era of television undead of "The Walking Dead," is really serious! The attention to the pink component is also underlined by precise casting choices that place in the role of Elizabeth Bennet the beautiful and talented Lily James, known for the TV series "Downton Abbey" and especially for the Disney film "Cinderella," and put her next to Sam Riley, who played the magical raven in the other Disney live-action "Maleficent," and the inexpressive idol of young girls Douglas Booth, seen in "Posh" and "Romeo & Juliet." To top it off, there's also Matt Smith, one of the most beloved Doctors of the series "Doctor Who," who adds a touch of humor, and then two class actors who come directly from "Game of Thrones," the Lannisters Charles Dance and Lena Headey, who add professionalism but confirm the intention of a mirage. And then there is this rushed screenplay where an attempt is made to condense nearly 400 pages into less than two hours and there is a strong sense of summary, with unclear passages, characters who disappear before our eyes, important events treated superficially and, above all, underdeveloped characters... including the protagonists. Here and there there are also some well-executed insights, such as the flies to identify the undead (detail invented specifically for the film) and the basic concept is in itself appealing, sufficiently bizarre to be remembered beyond the success or failure of the work. In the end, the prevailing feeling is that of a huge wasted opportunity, because by not ghettoizing in the PG-13 and with a more accurate screenplay, a memorable horror blockbuster could have emerged!
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Mediaset Infinity Mediaset Infinity
Timvision Timvision
Infinity Selection Amazon Channel Infinity Selection Amazon Channel
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (4)

Frank Ochieng

One thing is for certain: no one can accuse director Burr Steers’s off-kilter version of novelist Jane Austen’s lyrical literary landscape Pride and Prejudice as being deemed solely melancholy and manipulative. The challenge of presenting a sophisticated and sudsy exposition while incorporating the ghoulish gimmicky of zombies to elevate the surrealism and cynicism of the British-based costume drama is an ambitious taking to say the least. Thankfully, Steers delivers a halfway decent piercing period piece that accentuates both the elegance and eeriness of Austen’s blossomed universe of early 19th century English femininity dripping with refined defiance and desire. Hence, Steers’s somewhat choppy but inspired Pride and Prejudice and Zombies provides an imaginative and slightly insane spin on the austere exuberance of Austen’s classic romancer highlighted with the butt-kicking antics of the bombastic Bennett sisters.

There is no doubt that movie and television audiences throughout the years have been subjected to the omnipresence of the Jane Austen Experience through countless interpretations of her treasured Pride and Prejudice artistic works. For the most part, the radiance of Pride and Prejudice has always maintained its ravishing romanticism in the various incarnations showcased. However, Steers looks to promote a bloody-thirsty blueprint and enhance the urgent sense of Austen’s femme fatale movement–in this case unite the Bennett brood and arm them with the alertness of sinister-made sisterhood. Instinctively, the premise for Pride and Prejudice and Zombies gives off a bizarre but refreshing vibe when distributing its wacky brand of subversive feminine liberation.

Austen heroine Elizabeth Bennett has always been possessed in her personalized convictions especially when it came to love and stability. Nevertheless, Zombies’ Liz (Lily James) has a mission in mind that does not necessarily involve finding that ideal suitor of choice. In this case, Elizabeth and her sisters Jane, Mary, Kitty and Lydia (Bella Heathcoate, Mille Brasy, Suki Waterhouse and Ellie Bamber) are the sisterly slayers trained to eradicate the unwanted walking dead. The Bennett beauties, all skilled at exceptional swordplay courtesy of intensified training in China, are looked down upon within their elite social circles. Furthermore, the concern over the feisty Elizabeth and her siblings finding their soulmates rests on the shoulders of their worrisome parents Mr. and Mrs. Bennett (Charles Dance and Sally Phillips). What is to become of the vast Bennett estate should their offspring not find the eligible companions to continue the bloodline? The question remains: will the bashing Bennett babes go down in family history as courageous zombie huntresses or suffer the societal humiliation as available spinsters untouched?

Elizabeth’s preference is to be vigilant in her quest to zap out the zombie presence whenever possible as opposed to obsessing over whether she will hook the grand love of her life. Still, the very idea of meeting Colonel Darcy (Sam Riley) at one of the festive balls may have at least humbled the combative Elizabeth a bit and had her entertain the notion of embracing a romantic feeling. Unfortunately duty calls and the agenda for terminating the pesky zombies as they invade the region is the top priority for Bennett brigade.

Actually, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a frenetic fable that solidly works because it is able to competently marry two ubiquitous genres–zombie B-movies with prim and proper Austen period piece adaptations–and come up with a quirky and contentious commentary on female-oriented resistance and rage. Steers rips into the convention of womanhood wonderment with a horror flick romancer that has its sheer of nuanced nerve and chilly-minded charm. The gory shenanigans and showy execution of Zombies’ cinematic makeup from Remy Adefarasin’s luscious cinematography to David Warren’s production design and Julian Day’s costume designs all mesh with noted symmetry. The balance of wit, suspense, terror and tirade as the Bennett bunch and their suitors engage in swagger as they eliminate the detestable zombies feels delectable in manufactured naughtiness.

The performances are steady and give substance to the welcomed wackiness that uncannily defines this effectively compelling but twisted treat to Austen’s pretty protagonists dressed up in gorgeous gowns that conceal their blood-laced daggers. As the lead Bennett sister, James is rather engrossing as the impulsive sword-swinging sass as her unique spin on Austen’s curly-haired creation is as credible and creative as say Keira Knightley’s stamp on the Elizabeth Bennett role. Although rollicking in a zombie B-movie without relying too much on the crutch of high stakes camp, James and her supporting players are quite poised to go with the flow based on what the unpredictable material hands them.

The bottom line is that Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a serviceable spectacle that dares to weave a Victorian-cultured social class romance yarn with an undead creepfest while finding a common ground in the hidden psyche of the young woman’s destined determination for self-discovery. Perhaps introducing the less literate crowd to Jane Austen’s brand of high class sensibilities through the battling Bennetts during the onslaught of an English countryside zombie invasion would make other future Pride and Prejudice installments feel more renewed and receptive.

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2016)

1 hr, 49 mins.

Starring: Lily James, Sam Riley, Jack Huston, Bella Heathcoate, Douglas Booth, Matt Smith, Charles Dance, Sally Phillips, Suki Waterhouse, Ellie Bamber, Millie Brady

Directed by: Burr Steers

MPAA Rating: PG-13

Genre: Horror and Fantasy’Romance and Suspense

Critic’s rating: ** 1/2 stars (out of 4 stars)

(c) Frank Ochieng 2016

Gimly

Gimly

4 /10

Better than it had any right being, but still not very good.

Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product.

Reno

Reno

7 /10

From loathing to romance and zombie hunting!

I did not know there was a parody novel of Jane Austen's 200 years old classic. This was based on that, a multi-starrer film, but the lack of star value let down the film. This is the film with a familiar plot, in addition to that zombies were there, but that was not enough. The big names from the cast would have pulled the film out of the box office disaster if it had one or two. But still I think this film was okay, an acceptable with awesome production and performances.

It ended like there will be a sequel, but now I don't think there's going to be one. The story was kind of predictable. Well, I did predict, particularly the character Wickham. Though I was more curious about the Zombies, like how it was going to be used in the narration. I must say, they were excellent. I mean they were not given any big preference, but theirs part indeed helped to build a nice plot. Pretty well composed stunts. I mean carefully, without strong blood and gore, so they got PG13 and warning for the violences.

I think the film critics overreacted like usual. They're like the sheep herds, they follow one another and given verdict for this as a bad flick. But as a film fanatic, I don't think it is worth neglecting, especially if you are a fan of the original story. In the todays world, the critics are a bunch of circus clowns. So I hope you make a right choice on this, not because of me or the critics, if you haven't seen it yet.

6.5/10

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

1 /10

An absolute disgrace, for everyone involved. They killed Jane Austen!

I already had an idea that this movie was bad when I decided to see how bad it was. Unfortunately, the film is about as bad as it gets, cloyingly and terribly unhappy mixing up “Pride and Prejudice”, “Seven Samurai” and “Walking Dead”. There are no surprises here, the movie is what it says it is.

What would Jane Austen say? I think she would gladly eat the brains of Burr Steers and Seth Grahame Smith, if they were medically proven to have brains. After seeing this crappy movie, I personally have doubts about it. The movie tried to update or give us a different version of “Pride and Prejudice”… but instead it spit in Jane Austen's face full force. If I were the author, I would take this film as an insult. It's just stupid, idiotic, unintelligent and brutally crazy.

It's one of those movies where, quite simply, nothing works. There is no saving material here, no redeeming qualities. Scenery, costumes? Forget it… it was all a masquerade. CGI, action scenes? It looks like a video game without life or soul, with fight scenes choreographed to the millimeter, like a theater ballet. The actors? All the characters were meticulously run over by a script that should have been burned in the fireplace. If I were an actor, I would not have accepted to work in this film.

I can't write anything else. If you'll excuse me, I'm going to stop here, I need to throw up.

Reviews provided by TMDB