The Cabin in the Woods backdrop
The Cabin in the Woods poster

THE CABIN IN THE WOODS

2012 US HMDB
April 12, 2012

Five friends set out for a weekend at a remote cabin in the woods, expecting nothing more than fun and relaxation. As night falls, they discover that something far more unsettling is at work and that nothing about their getaway is what it seems.

Directors

Cast

👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Jason Clark (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Drew Goddard (Screenplay)Joss Whedon (Screenplay)
Music: David Julyan (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Peter Deming (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Five young people borrow a mountain cabin from the cousin of one of them to spend a weekend of wild fun. Upon arrival, everything seems normal and the house welcoming, but someone is watching them through a closed-circuit camera system scattered throughout the building. This someone wants to push them into the basement at all costs, and when the five go down attracted by a trapdoor that suddenly opens, a long night of terror begins in which all the worst nightmares will become reality. It is very difficult to talk about "That House in the Woods" to readers who potentially have not yet seen the film. The trailers say very little and seem aimed at confusing the viewers with the classic effect of "but what will this film be about?" and even the plot mentioned above is not at all explanatory. In fact, at first glance, it might seem like the usual film that follows the path of the teen slasher like "Friday the 13th" or the lesson taught by Sam Raimi with "The Evil Dead" and indeed the screenwriter and director Drew Goddard plays with these expectations and with a series of clichés aimed at winking at the passionate and often savvy viewer. Of course, "That House in the Woods" will not follow either the Raimi Evil Dead or serial killers with hockey masks, but it will turn into unimaginable territories building what some of my colleagues have defined, probably rightly, "the definitive horror film". It may seem exaggerated, but after seeing "That House in the Woods" it really is difficult to think of new directions that a horror film could take because Goddard has succeeded in the titanic task of putting everything, but an ALL-CAPS EVERYTHING, the history of horror in practice, into a fun and engaging miscellany that often leaves the viewer open-mouthed. Think about what "Scream" was in 1996, a film that played with films to build its own specific personality. Well, "That House in the Woods" sets itself more or less a similar goal, excluding however the citationalism (at least not the direct one) and the metafilm component. Goddard's skill lies in filling his film with clichés (the five handsome young people including the virgin, the athlete, the easy blonde, the intellectual, and the stoner, the isolated and cursed place, the forest from which the threat comes, etc.) but using them for very specific purposes that are absolutely essential to the story (and all motivated!), thus transforming the clichés into full-fledged narrative elements. Even the threat that will haunt the protagonists is born from the unlikely banality of the horror imagination to transfiguring itself into a multitude of iconic imagery from genre cinema and literature. At a certain point in the story, when the basement trapdoor has opened and an arm has suddenly emerged from the ground outside the cabin, visually quoting "The Evil Dead", the cartridges of the deliberately already seen are exhausted and a real fair of the unpredictable begins that even manages to draw from the imagination of Clive Barker and Howard Phillips Lovecraft. The cards on the table keep changing, and in particular the last 20-25 minutes of the film go in a direction that perhaps all of us as children imagined while fantasizing about the plots of our games, but that no one has ever dared to bring to the big screen. Another point in favor of "That House in the Woods" is that it wanted to provide an alternative point of view on the story, which is not limited, therefore, to the five young horror stereotypes, but adds a group of "employees" who from the beginning contribute to confusing the viewer's ideas. This expedient helps to make the adventure of the five friends on vacation theoretical and at the same time participatory, thus moving once and for all the accusation of "usual film" that some viewer might move to "That House in the Woods" in the first minutes from the beginning. Drew Goddard here makes his directorial debut with flair behind the camera, but his experience in the audiovisual field comes from writing cult series like "Buffy", "Alias", and especially "Lost" "from which perhaps some narrative influences can be seen", as well as the beautiful "Cloverfield". But in the "That House in the Woods" operation, which went into production several years ago and was delayed by the idea, later faded, of presenting the film in 3D, Joss Whedon, the father of "Buffy", "Firefly", and "Dollhouse", as well as the director of the Marvelian "The Avengers", also participates as co-screenwriter and producer. The cast alternates faces known to the public such as Richard Jenkins ("Blood Story"; "Liberal Arts") and Chris Hemsworth ("Star Trek"; "Thor") with unknowns (or almost) perfectly suitable for the roles, such as the delightful Kristen Connolly, the blonde who guarantees the dose of nudity Anna Hutchinson, and the stoned Fran Kranz. In a cameo appears Sigourney Weaver. As you will have noticed, I have been very vague because talking about "That House in the Woods" without spoilers is really difficult. Know that Goddard has made a great film, absolutely well-written and with original ideas if not downright brilliant... and originality, in these times, is really the rarest primary good in cinema. "That House in the Woods" is a little manual on horror cinema in which with irony and above all intelligence it reflects on this type of cinema and on the narrative dynamics that it generates and from which it is generated. Not simple citationalism but sagacious elaboration of very broad narrative material, aimed at the creation of a fresh and engaging product. Surely it will set a precedent. Must-see! Rounded up vote. "That House in the Woods" will be released in Italian cinemas on Friday, May 18.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (4)

Andres Gomez

8 /10

Hilarious and frightened: shaken, not stirred.

Great movie, one of the best in this "genre" for quite a while.

LastCaress1972

Finally got around to The Cabin in the Woods. 8/10, great fun. A Joss Whedon-(co)written (also co-written and directed by Drew Goddard, who wrote Cloverfield) take on an old horror staple in which 5 stereotypical teenagers (an academic, a jock, a stoner, a slut and a "nice" girl) venture out into the woods for a dirty weekend. It's no spoiler to say that these unfortunate young naïfs appear to have been cherry-picked and are being heavily monitored all the way into the woods by some very (very) high-tech manner of... what? Government agency? It's with these fellows that we visit first, before we ever meet our protagonists; two middle-aged, white collar I.T. types, a little brow-beaten by what appears to be a fairly monotonous job (although it really ****ing isn't) but full of typical office cameraderie and essentially confident in their own competence and that of the numerous other departments that make up this rather large-scale operation. Whoever is watching our heroes/heroines, they're big-time. So, what's happening? To say more would be to start giving things away, but those kids are very deliberate archetypes, placed in a very deliberately typical horror scenario. Because it's an American film set in America, it's called The Cabin in the Woods as is befitting the conventions of God-knows-how-many American horror flicks. Were it a J-Horror set in Tokyo, it would be called The Freaky Long-Haired Schoolgirl Ghost, an assertion ably illustrated in the film itself to great and rather humourous effect.

Decent performances all-round, even the deliberately irritating characters are kind-of likeable. A pre-Thor Chris Hemsworth is particularly good as is Richard Jenkins (Nathaniel "The Dead Patriarch" Fisher from Six Feet Under). It threw me a bit, this film, because in purposely not looking too deeply at what it was about prior to seeing it, I mistakenly thought I was about to watch a seriously scary and effective horror, and this isn't the case at all. It's a slick product with what looks like a decent budget as you'd expect from a Joss Whedon project (in case you've been under a rock somewhere, he of Buffy/Angel and latterly of The Avengers fame) and it's loaded with nods to other horror literary and cinematic classics (The Evil Dead, Hellraiser, The Strangers and HP Lovecraft's Cthulhu Mythos are all fairly explicitly referenced), but it's not especially gory, it's intentionally funny more often than it's intentionally scary and it's a real thrill-ride, a slice of fun. It's not quite there, but it's a damn site closer to "Horror-Comedy" than it is to balls-out "Horror". It's not perfect by a long way - it instills bags of concerned curiosity in the viewer, but provokes almost zero real tension whatsoever. And late-on a special effects extravaganza treads clumsily into Night at the Museum-for-grown-ups territory. But it remains a great way to spend a couple of hours.

Dark Jedi

5 /10

This is another one of those movies where I cannot understand why so many people give it so high scores. Sure it’s not a really bad movie but, personally, I found it only moderately good. I’m not sure whether the movie was intended to be scary or funny or both. It wasn’t very funny though and only moderately scary.

It has been presented as a not-your-usual-teenage-slasher-horror movie. Well, it sure has an interesting twist but…it is still a teenage slasher horror movie. The twist could really have lifted the movie but unfortunately this good idea is pretty much wasted in a poor implementation.

Instead of holding on to the surprise it’s spoiled right away with that eagle flying in to the force field (since when did we learn to build force fields by the way?). Another thing that really drags down the film are these utter morons in the control room. If this was really a matter of survival of mankind then you would have thought that it would have been left to professional people and not these jerks.

The movie isn’t all bad though. With the exception of these major flaws it does pass as a decent slasher/horror movie and makes for a reasonably entertaining hour and a half of not too intelligent movie watching. The part nearing the end where all the monsters goes on a rampage is rather fun to watch. I was not very impressed by the end itself though. That was rather uninspired I would say.

Gimly

Gimly

9 /10

The following is a long-form review that I originally wrote in 2012.

Jesus Christ. What just happened to my brain?

I was worried that Cabin in the Woods was gonna be a letdown, ‘cause I had built it up so much in my head, and it seemed such a ridiculous concept that it would have been nearly impossible to pull off flawlessly. And maybe it won’t go to join the ranks of my favourite films in existence, but it was… So. Fucking. Good.

Drew Goddard (who wrote Cloverfield) is no stranger to working with Joss Whedon (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, The Avengers) and my God do they ever make a team. Joss Whedon is my unopposed all-time favourite person involved in the film industry in any way, shape, or form. Which is quite the claim, given my interests. He’s had a couple of fuck ups, and been fucked around a few times too, but all in all, nobody captures me quite the way he does.

I’ll try and aim for not-spoilers, if you watch the trailer you’ll get that this isn’t a typical horror movie. You’ll also pick up on that if you watch the first 5 minutes of the damn thing. I won’t go into the finer details, but let me just reiterate, it is NOT a slasher film. There’s a fair amount of horror, some action, some sci-fi, a bit of fantasy, some short but sweet comedy, a bunch of thriller, a little monster-movie, a bit of homage and a healthy (but not overdone) dose of parody. Joss Whedon tends to do that, his work is usually less in the horror genre and more in the… Genre genre. If that makes sense.

I seem to recall it performing kind of averagely at the box office, but critical reception was fantastic. And rightfully so. And fan-aimed movies as good as this always manage to fall into their cult, so there’s a pretty avid group of people who are super keen on it, too. Again, rightly so. I think the best (as well as most important) thing about Cabin in the Woods, is that it pumps some new blood into horror. Sure, it wasn’t 100% original, but then it never claimed to be. At least it wasn’t a sequel or another bloody remake.

Seriously, I hate on remakes much, much less than most, but come on people! This is all rather ridiculous. Imagine if the Wachowskis had said “Hey, we’ve got this great idea for a dystopian, industrial sci-fi type thing called The Matrix… Actually, you know what? That sounds like an awful lot of effort. Let’s do an over the top American remake of The Castle instead!” Yeah, sounds like a great world to live in. Fuckin’… Lazy ‘n shit…

Lost track there, anyway! Cabin in the Woods! Fuck! Good! Watch that shit! Make up your own mind of course, but I really dig it. There’s something to be said for being fucked up and going with it. I’m sure some people will dismiss Cabin entirely, because it’s so out there. And I’m sure even more people will get pissy about the ending. But if you have no expectations, and just try enjoy the ride, then I think you damn well might.

87%

-Gimly

Reviews provided by TMDB