Destino final 3 backdrop
Destino final 3 poster

DESTINO FINAL 3

Final Destination 3

2006 • US HMDB
febrero 9, 2006

Una estudiante del instituto tiene una premonición sobre una tragedia en un parque de atracciones local, por lo que decide no montarse en una montaña rusa que presiente va a descarrilar...

Directores

Reparto

👍 👎 🔥 1 🧻 👑 (1)

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Equipo

Produccion: Craig Perry (Producer)Warren Zide (Producer)Richard Brener (Executive Producer)Toby Emmerich (Executive Producer)Matt Moore (Executive Producer)
Guion: James Wong (Screenplay)Glen Morgan (Screenplay)
Musica: Shirley Walker (Original Music Composer)
Fotografia: Robert McLachlan (Director of Photography)

RESEÑAS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli •
Cerca de la entrega de los diplomas, los estudiantes de la escuela secundaria McKinney se dirigen a un parque de atracciones para celebrar el evento. La atracción principal está representada por "Devil's Flight", un complejo monumental de montañas rusas. Mientras un grupo de jóvenes está a punto de tomar asiento en los vagones del vuelo del diablo, Wendy tiene una premonición en la que asiste a su muerte debido a un fallo en las vías. La chica se dispone a bajarse del vagón y advierte también a los demás pasajeros: algunos la siguen, otros creen que solo quiere llamar la atención. Pero el desastre ocurre y los jóvenes que escaparon de la muerte, morirán uno a uno de "accidentes" atroces. Corría el año 2000 y los pasajeros del vuelo 180 con destino a París, que escaparon del trágico accidente anunciado por uno de ellos, encontraron la muerte, o mejor dicho, la Muerte los encontró, a pocos días de distancia. Año 2003: la historia se repite y los supervivientes del accidente de tráfico de la carretera estatal 23, cerca de la salida 180, quedan muertos por extrañas y mortales coincidencias. A tres años del último encuentro con la Muerte, los creadores de la primera película lo intentan de nuevo y ponen en marcha la misma estructura narrativa de los episodios anteriores, con la variante del accidente inicial que esta vez tiene lugar en un parque de atracciones (aunque sería más correcto hablar de dos accidentes) y la técnica que usan los protagonistas para prevenir las muertes. Naturalmente, como en las películas anteriores, hay que saber captar las señales para escapar de la muerte, pero esta vez serán unas simples fotografías las que sugieran a los protagonistas las horribles muertes que tocarán a los supervivientes. El espectacular accidente inicial, por desgracia, no aguanta la comparación (en espectacularidad y ferocidad) con el puesto en escena en la segunda película de la saga, pero se defiende bastante bien, sobre todo gracias a la originalidad de la situación. "Final destination 3" es una simple operación comercial surgida de los excelentes resultados de los capítulos anteriores, por lo que los creadores de la película, conscientes de esto y del hecho de que bastaba ya la primera película para explicar la historia de manera adecuada, se han lanzado de cabeza a la coreografía y a la originalidad de las muertes, consiguiendo distraer al espectador de un argumento pobre y repetitivo. De hecho, aquí está el límite de "Final destination 3": una historia nada original, que no hace más que recorrer a grandes rasgos la de las dos películas anteriores sin innovaciones evidentes (los productores habrán pensado: ¿por qué alterar un formato ganador!). Sin embargo, en este caso también se nota una total superficialidad de los personajes y un desarrollo demasiado apresurado de la trama, seguramente más ocupado en la puesta en escena de los accidentes mortales que en la delimitación psicológica de los protagonistas. Pero no nos engañemos a nosotros mismos: ¿qué espectador elige ir a ver el tercer capítulo de "Final destination" con la intención de asistir a una historia original y a un desarrollo de los personajes? Más bien se espera asistir a una matanza truculenta basada en accidentes improbables a costa de personajes estúpidos y antipáticos; y eso ocurre puntualmente. Los accidentes puestos en escena en "Final destination 3" son simplemente geniales, logran exacerbar la situación hasta lo inverosímil para concluir, a menudo y voluntariamente, con muertes muy sangrientas. La dirección ha vuelto a las manos de James Wong, ya ocupado detrás de la cámara del primer episodio; mientras que el guion es obra de Glen Morgan (director de "Willard") y del mismo Wong. Entre los intérpretes se pueden ver solo rostros desconocidos y jóvenes actores, entre ellos Mary Elizabeth Winstead, en el papel de la protagonista, y Ryan Merriman. En conclusión, "Final destination 3" es un simple y esencial splatterstick horror, poco original pero extremadamente divertido. Recomendado sobre todo a quienes buscan noventa minutos de entretenimiento absoluto. Curiosidad. El actor Tony Todd, conocido del público de terror por haber dado vida al personaje de "Candyman" y a Ben en el remake de "La noche de los muertos vivientes", se había convertido en una presencia fija también en la saga de "Final destination", en los papeles de un misterioso tipo que da consejos e información sobre la Muerte. Pero en este tercer capítulo, dado que la acción se traslada a otra ciudad, se ha preferido no incluir a su personaje. Sin embargo, para crear continuidad con la saga y para hacer felices a los fans, el actor aparece igualmente, prestando su voz al gigante diablo que atrae a los clientes en el "Devil's flight".
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Dónde Ver

Alquilar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Comprar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

RESEÑAS DE LA COMUNIDAD (5)

John Chard

John Chard

7 /10

Roller Toaster.

Final Destination the series moves into its third instalment without really changing the formula that was working for it. Here the opening disaster involves a Roller Coaster crash that is brought via a premonition to Wendy Christensen (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). As in the previous two films, the visionary and some friends get spooked and get off the coaster to find it actually does crash and a bunch of horrific deaths befall all those on board. Sure enough the survivors start being killed off in equally gruesome ways, it becomes apparent that the old grim reaper is out to claim the deaths that were denied him.

The opening section of FD3 is superb, the credits roll to a back drop of various carnival/fairground attractions that offer up foreboding terror, all backed by an eerie rumbling musical score. Then the crash itself is excellently stage, so much so that anyone frightened of Roller Coasters can point to this as a reason why! Then we revert to type, the youthful cast get bumped off in more ingenious ways, with more gore and lashings of dark humour pumped up this time (the use of Love Roller Coaster by The Ohio Players is genius). The narrative drive this time involves photographs, which is a nice touch and overcomes the triteness of some dialogue exchanges.

It's a safe entry in the series, and it boasts in Winstead the best young lead actress of the whole franchise. As with all horror films - franchises, some will love it and some will hate it, but ultimately it really does exactly what the previous two films did. So if a fan of those then this does a good job as well. The 2 disc DVD comes with a delightful choose their fate option, which with a bit of playing around gives you a slightly different version of the film. While it is recommended you turn up your home cinema systems for the Roller Coaster segments. 7/10

Dark Jedi

4 /10

In short, not a very exciting movie. It was not at all as good as the previous ones. Not that this was very surprising of course since the general consensus on the web seems to be that 1 & 2 are quite good, 3 & 4 not so much while the 5th is supposed to be back in shape.

Unfortunately, in this 3rd installment it seems that the producer took some shortcuts and produced the all to common teenage splatter movie. That is, do not bother about spending time on a decent script nor any acting capabilities to talk about. Replace all that with some wiggling boobs and behinds to appeal to the not too intelligent part of the teenage movie going audience, kill of a few of the bearers of said boobs and behinds at regular intervals in an increasingly goory and spectacular way and you’re done.

I kind of like the goory and violent bit, it’s supposed to be a horror movie after all, but I would prefer that it was strung together in something that at least can be said to be semi-intelligent way. Well, you cannot have a film collection if you do not have all the films in a series can you? So I cannot say that I regret buying the set but I do not think this one will go up on the films to re-watch list any time soon.

Wuchak

Wuchak

5 /10

Decent, but now formulaic entry in this 'Dead Teenager' series

The first "Final Destination" movie in 2000 was a rather innovative 'Dead Teenager Movie' in that the killer was Death itself, as an invisible spirit. A group of people, mostly teens, escape a great tragedy due to a premonition of one of them and the rest of the movie involves the Grim Reaper systematically slaying the kids who cheated Death in various creative ways, usually an unlikely chain of events. The opening tragedy in the first film was a plane crash, in the second it's a horrible highway pile-up while in this third entry it's a rollercoaster mishap.

All of the movies in the five-film franchise tell the same basic story with different characters and minor nuances; all of them are of the same high quality of technical filmmaking. Whether you prefer one or another depends on your preference for cast members and the death sequences (and the locations). Other than these factors they're all basically the same.

Released in 2006, "Final Destination 3" has a quality doe-eyed heroine or 'final girl' in Mary Elizabeth Winstead. There are some other worthy female cast members, like Alexz Johnson, Chelan Simmons, Crystal Lowe and Amanda Crew. These five ladies represent perhaps the best assortment of women in the series yet.

While it’s true that you know exactly how this film plays out if you've seen the first two installments, or any of them, there are some highlights beyond the female cast. For instance, the rollercoaster accident is thrilling and rings true in light of real-life mishaps at amusement parks. There’s also a horrifying tanning booth death sequence, which was done better in “Urban Legends: Bloody Mary” from the previous year (2005). Another death scene occurs at a warehouse where two of the protagonists work. I also liked how an extended sequence outside the teens’ school takes place in the rain, which shows attention to detail (or making the best of a rainy day during shooting, whatever).

For me, what makes these movies kinda dull is the fact that it's impossible to cheat Death. Sure, you can escape it here or there, but Death's been in business for millennia and expertly knows what he's doing. As such, everyone's gonna die except maybe the 'final girl,' who will most probably die in the sequel.

In case you’re interested, there's an interesting 20-minute documentary about "Dead Teenager Movies" on the 'extras' disk with Roger Ebert being a highlight.

The film runs 93 minutes and was shot in the Vancouver area, as were all the Final Destination flicks, except the fourth one.

GRADE: C+/B-

Andre Gonzales

Andre Gonzales

8 /10

This has the best intro to a movie I have ever seen. I'm sure we all have thought about a disaster on a roller coaster at some point in our lives. When we are about to get on a roller coaster. It's a messed up thing to see but it's awesome to see it in this movie.

r96sk

r96sk

6 /10

<em>'Final Destination 3'</em> is another dud from this franchise, even if it isn't anything that I'd consider truly terrible - just real forgettable. The plot is boring, the repetitiveness is starting to ring as true as expected. They aren't trying to add any freshness, just respinning the same wheel.

The cast are OK, Mary Elizabeth Winstead is the better lead compared to this entry's predecessor. Those onscreen aren't strong enough to make up for the movie's many other shortcomings, though. At least the effects and deaths are still solid, certainly the best element of these follow-ups.

I can't say I'm expecting much from the final two sequels, here's hoping they tried to add new intrigue - something that has been missing since the gist of the plot was revealed in the original.

Reseñas proporcionadas por TMDB