Dracula Untold backdrop
Dracula Untold poster

DRACULA UNTOLD

2014 US HMDB
octobre 1, 2014

Les origines du mythe sont révélés dans ce film situé dans les années de règne de Vlad Tepes, prince roumain qui a inspiré la légende pour ses méthodes propres à provoquer la peur parmi son peuple et ses ennemis. Un mélange de mythologie et d'histoire nous raconte la manière dont l'empereur sanguinaire est devenu le premier vampire de l'histoire. L'un des personnages les plus terribles et sadiques d'Europe qui a inspiré le classique de la littérature de Bram Stoker mélangeant l'horreur, le surnaturelle et une touche d'amour.

Réalisateurs

Distribution

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Commentaires

Commentaires (0)

Equipe

Production: Michael De Luca (Producer)Joseph M. Caracciolo Jr. (Executive Producer)Jon Jashni (Executive Producer)Alissa Phillips (Executive Producer)Thomas Tull (Executive Producer)
Scenario: Matt Sazama (Writer)Burk Sharpless (Writer)
Musique: Ramin Djawadi (Original Music Composer)
Photographie: John Schwartzman (Director of Photography)

CRITIQUES (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Il principe Vlad fa di tutto per respingere i tentativi dell'impero Ottomano di utilizzare la Romania come un punto d'appoggio per conquistare il resto d'Europa. Dopo aver appreso che il malvagio Sultano Mehmed II vuole sottrarre suo figlio per annetterlo all’esercito turco, Vlad sale su una montagna dove risiede un oscuro demone con la speranza di fare un patto con lui finché possa sconfiggere le orde turche. Il demone accoglie la sua richiesta, ma questo avviene pagando il prezzo della sua trasformazione in una creatura della notte. Una volta Dracula faceva paura. Questo è l’intento con cui lo scrittore Bram Stoker lo creò nel 1987 ispirandosi alla spietata figura di Vlad Tepes e questo è il motivo per cui il più famoso di tutti i vampiri è diventato forse la più rappresentativa creatura del pantheon orrorifico multimediale. Lo aveva ben capito Tod Browning, che nel 1931 affidò all’inquietante sagoma di Bela Lugosi il compito di portarlo al cinema, così come Terence Fisher, che con “Dracula il Vampiro” del 1958 ha forse creato il miglior Dracula di sempre grazie all’azzeccato casting di Christopher Lee nel ruolo del famoso succhiasangue. Non dimentichiamo l’ottimo “Dracula di Bram Stoker” diretto nel 1992 da Francis Ford Coppola e interpretato da un camaleontico Gary Oldman, che ha dato al nobile vampiro un’inedita dignità da cinema mainstream… poi il buio. Infatti, se escludiamo la rilettura non riuscitissima ma comunque apprezzabile per originalità fatta da Patrick Lussier con “Dracula’s Legacy – Il fascino del Male” nel 2000, gli altri film in cui il Principe Vampiro è stato protagonista non hanno di certo lasciato il segno. Tutti abbiamo (fortunatamente) dimenticato il trascurabile vampiro visto nel giocattolone “Van Helsing”, che sembrava una versione meno kitsch di Renato Zero, per non parlare dell’anonimo Thomas Kretschmann protagonista del pessimo “Dracula 3D” di Dario Argento o l’indifendibile Jonathan Rhys Meyers che ha dato corpo al vampiro nella serie tv della NBC. Insomma tante versioni dello stesso personaggio che il più delle volte hanno lasciato a desiderare. Non sfugge alla regola il “Dracula Untold” diretto dall’esordiente Gary Shore e interpretato da Luke Evans che, realisticamente, va a inserirsi tra le peggiori versioni cinematografiche di un “certo peso” realizzate sul personaggio inventato da Bram Stoker. Partiamo da presupposto che questo Dracula con il Dracula creato dallo scrittore irlandese non ha davvero nulla a che fare, piuttosto gli sceneggiatori Matt Sazama e Burk Sharpless hanno sviluppato l’idea di raccontare un Dracula inedito che partisse dal lato più umano del personaggio. Per questo “Dracula Untold”, che nel titolo di lavorazione si chiamava “Dracula: Year Zero”, è il racconto della genesi del personaggio, una sorta di prequel alla storia che già conosciamo, che parte dall’uomo e non dal mostro. Sulla carta, questa intuizione era ottima: raccontare l’aspetto storico di Dracula, a cui lo stesso Stoker ha attinto, e non la solita e trita storia del nobile vampiro che circuisce Harker, cerca di sedurre Mina ed è cacciato da Van Helsing. Eppure, malgrado le ottime premesse, il team di “Dracula Untold” è riuscito a fare il peggio possibile. Innanzitutto questo film tradisce tutto e tutti: romanzo, Storia (con la “s” maiuscola) e precedente filmografia vampirica, trasformando Dracula in un supereroe tipo quelli che oggi vanno tanto al botteghino. “Dracula Untold”, infatti, poteva benissimo titolarsi “Superman Untold” risultando più onesto con il pubblico pagante perché un Vampiro così, francamente, fa sorridere e sa tanto di presa per i fondelli. Qui Vlad III di Valacchia è un sovrano leale e coraggioso, che ama sua moglie Mirena, stravede per il suo figlioletto Ingeras e fa il bene del suo popolo, cercando di contrastare l’esercito ottomano capeggiato dallo spietato Sultano Mehmed Secondo. Quando il cattivone, che è interpretato da un ridicolo Dominic Cooper con eyeliner alla Serse di “300”, ordina che il figlio di Dracula dovrà entrare a far parte dell’esercito turco, suo padre decide che è ora di ribellarsi all’invasore e si arrampica su una montagna dove si dice viva un demone. Il mostro c’è davvero, è interpretato da Charles Dance di “Last Action Hero” e “Il Trono di Spade”, ha l’aspetto della Morte in “Il settimo sigillo” è in realtà è un vampiro, che a sua volta vampirizza Vlad. Da questo momento c’è l’iter del supereroe che scopre i suoi superpoteri: udito ipersviluppato, vista di fuoco, possibilità di teletrasporto, super-forza, l’immancabile “kryptonite” (che qui è l’argento, come per i lupi mannari) e chi più ne ha più ne metta. E tutto questo accade proprio come solitamente succede nei film Marvel, anzi, come accade in Spiderman, in particolare. E vai con le spacconate a raffica che mal si coniugano con l’immagine che tutti noi abbiamo di Dracula, che a un certo punto si tinge anche di fantasy epico, con battaglie alla “Signore degli Anelli”, che ci dicono quanto sceneggiatori, produttori e regista abbiano sbagliato film. Tutto ciò va a tradire il personaggio letterario di cui colpevolmente il film si appropria, fraintende e riscrive malamente l’iconografia vampirica, che subisce un altro duro colpo dopo lo stupro di Stephenie Meyer e i suoi “Twilight”, e racconta uno scenario storico completamente falsato. Insomma, un disastro. Per di più, “Dracula Untold”, costato un centinaio di dollari, si avvale di moltissimi effetti visivi che purtroppo appaiono abbastanza dozzinali, fa un uso della violenza da PG-13, e non si distingue neanche per la spettacolarità dell’azione, di cui comunque in più occasioni si forgia. Luke Evans ha troppo l’aspetto da modello per il ruolo che è chiamato a vestire, Sarah Gadon, che interpreta sua moglie, è una bambolina frignante della cui sorte ben poco ci interessa, Dominic Cooper – come già detto – fa sorridere per il look nonché risulta piuttosto irrilevante. Difficile trovare un aspetto positivo in “Dracula Untold”! Pare che questo film sarà il primo dell’annunciato Monster Universe, ovvero il rilancio delle icone horror classiche che la Universal Pictures vuole intraprendere guardando a un progetto multi-film che somigli a quello sviluppato dalla Marvel. A questo punto – visto anche il finale aperto di “Dracula Untold” – dobbiamo aspettarci uno o più sequel e poi un nuovo Frankenstein, La Mummia, L’uomo invisibile, L’uomo lupo, Il mostro della Laguna nera e poi tutta una serie di cross-over tra questo e quel mostro e poi tutti i mostri insieme stile “The Avengers” e poi… e poi… basta, direi!
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Commentaires

Commentaires (0)

Où Regarder

Louer

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

Acheter

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

AVIS DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ (5)

Andres Gomez

5 /10

FX, Evans and Dance's performances are the only things to save in this movie.

If you think Dracula becoming a hero and a martyr is a good idea, you will like it. Otherwise, like in my case, you will think that it was the worst idea in quite some time.

So, Dracula is not the most evil creature in the world any more ... :(

Dark Jedi

8 /10

That the so called “critics” at Rotten Tomatoes screws this movie over is not really a surprise. Said “critics” are usually out of sync with both my opinions and the opinions of most of the viewers which can be seen again from the fact that these people give this movie a 23% rating whereas the actual viewers give it a 60% rating. At lot of “purists” also seem to take a disliking to this movie. Well, the movie is named Dracula Untold so it should be no surprise that the story would be a new one.

Personally I found this movie quite enjoyable. Yes it is not the original Dracula story but it is not straying too far from the basic origins and it is really a quite decent story unlike some of the disastrous Hollywood rewrites. The original story claims that Dracula became a vampire during his battles with the Turks and this movie picks up on that and tells the story of how that happened. Unlike most (all?) Dracula movies, Dracula is not really the bad guy but rather the inverse and the movie tells a story about sacrifices and Dracula’s quest to keep some of his humanity, moral and sanity.

It would not be a Dracula movie without some blood flowing and this movie delivers without overdoing it. Actually the actual bloodsucking stuff is quite played down until the end of the movie. There are a fair amount of fights against the Turks (who are the real bad guys in this movie) though and blood as well as various body parts no longer attached to their proper places does float around quite a bit. The special effects are not forgotten and I quite liked the bat swarms that Dracula commanded during the final fights against the Turks.

I found Luke Evans performance as the prince and unwilling Dracula to be quite good. The rest of the characters were also well played. I am sure that none of them will be nominated for Oscars due to their part in this movie but I have nothing negative to say about their performance.

On the whole I found this movie quite enjoyable and I definitely disagree with all the people blasting it. I did also quite like the last couple of scenes in modern time at the end which teased of a follow up movie. I would definitely like to see that happen.

Wuchak

Wuchak

7 /10

Dracula: The dark Superman

RELEASED IN 2014 and directed by Gary Shore, "Dracula Untold” tells the origin of Dracula: In the 15th century Prince Vlad the Impaler (Luke Evans) must protect his small kingdom of Wallachia (in modern-day Romania) from a Turk warlord (Dominic Cooper) who demands a thousand boys from Wallachia & Transylvania, including Vlad’s son. Threatened by the unsurmountable Turk army, Vlad desperately makes a dubious pact with a formidable caged vampire in order to acquire its dark powers and save his family & kingdom. Sarah Gadon plays Vlad’s winsome wife.

The producers flirted with the idea of “Dracula Untold” being part of Universal’s Dark Universe; and the epilogue of the movie, set in the modern world, suggests this, insinuating a franchise. This idea was dropped, however, and “The Mummy” (2017) became the first official film in the Dark Universe. In any case, “Dracula Untold” was fairly successful at the Box Office, making $56.3 million in North America and $217.1 million worldwide against a cost of $70 million.

My title blurb pretty much tells you all you need to know: “Dracula Untold” is basically the dark Superman of 15th century Eastern Europe where Dracula wields the power to defeat a thousand-man army. If you like the great prologue to Coppola’s “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” (1992), you’ll probably like this movie, which gives several nods to that forerunner.

The film LOOKS awesome and has a fine cast. But unlike “Bram Stoker’s Dracula,” it’s rapidly paced and doesn’t leave much room to breathe; so the characterizations aren’t quite deep enough. It’s good, but somehow hollow and forgettable. “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” was perhaps a little too slow while “Dracula Untold” is too hurried. I wish the creators found the happy medium between the two because, with just a little bit more time and attention to detail, it could’ve been great.

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour, 32 minutes and was shot entirely in Northern Ireland. WRITERS: Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless.

GRADE: B

tmdb28039023

1 /10

Bram Stoker's Count Dracula is textbook example of my Evil Iceberg Theory (the less you see of and know about a villain, the better). In an epistolary novel, the title character is the only one who doesn’t set his thoughts down in letters or in a diary (or, like Dr. Seward, a phonograph recording).

If, as Lovecraft wrote, "The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown," then Dracula is the embodiment of this fear; inscrutable, unknowable, unreachable, impossible to negotiate or reason with.

Moreover, it’s futile to try to assign him complex motivation; like the shark in Jaws or Dr. Lecter, the Count kills to feed — no more, no less. Taking all this into account, it's easy to see how bad an idea Dracula Untold really is.

The story is narrated — a long time after it took place, though oddly in the same childlike voice the narrator had when the events trasnspired — by Ingeras (Art Parkinson), son of Vlad III Draculea, aka the Impaler, aka Son of the Dragon, aka Son of the Devil, aka Dracula; let's just call him Vlad (Luke Evans).

"In the year of our Lord 1442, the Turkish sultan enslaved 1,000 children from Transylvania to fill the ranks of his army." One of these children grew up to become Vlad, who "disgusted by his monstrous deeds ... buried his past with the dead and returned to Transylvania to rule in peace." So Vlad just took his ball and went home. Just like that, no revolt required. Someone should tell the Sultan how slavery really works.

This notwithstanding, Wallachia and Transylvania remain under Ottoman rule, and Vlad must pay an annual tribute to Sultan Mehmed II (Dominic Cooper); one can't help wondering why these two peoples are so hostile to each other, especially seeing how they share the lingua franca of British English.

Mehmed takes it upon himself to 'enslaving' a thousand other children (perhaps the first thousand just walked away like Vlad?), including Ingeras. Vlad refuses, and knowing that this means war, goes to a cave in a mountain to seek help from "a vampire. From the Greek word pi, to drink [actually 'pi' is a Greek letter; the language in which it is a word that means 'drink' or 'suck' is Albanian]. The beast was once a mortal man who summoned a demon from the depths of hell to barter for his dark power. The demon deceived the man, granting his wish, but his price was an eternity condemned to the darkness of that cave, where he remains until he finds another to free him."

The cave vampire (Charles Dance), who once was a Roman and thus speaks, like all Romans do in the movies, the Queen's English, gives Vlad a sip of his blood, and with it “a taste of my power. The strength of 100 men. The speed of a shooting star. Domain of the night and all its creatures. See and hear through your senses. Even heal grievous wounds ... Once you drink, your thirst for human blood will be insatiable. But if you can hold out for three days, you will return to your mortal state having tasted my power, and perhaps saved your people. [What if I feed?] I will be freed having granted the darkness a worthy offering. You will become … like me. A scourge on this earth destined to destroy everything you love… I, however, will be free to unleash my wrath against the one who betrayed me. And one day, I will call upon you to serve me, my pawn, in an immortal game of revenge."

All this does is show that sometimes no explanation is the best explanation. Let's compare Coppola’s Dracula, in whose introduction — featuring modern Romanian dialogue with medieval English syntax (perhaps not historically correct but still much better than English-English) — Gary Oldman plunges his sword into the stone cross of a chapel, and drinks the blood that flows from it.

This doesn't necessarily make any more sense, but at least it's short and to the point, and Coppola has the good sense to not even try to explain it.

Conversely, all of Dracula Untold’s heavy exposition only raises more questions than it answers. How did this Roman guy end up in Transylvania? Are there no caves in Rome? Why can't he leave the cave and Vlad can? What exactly does "an immortal game of revenge" mean? This phrase simply reeks of oxymoron.

Speaking of Coppola, he was the second to make the character of Dracula and the historical Dracula one and the same person, and add a Reincarnation Romance to the plot (the first was Dan Curtis in his own 1974 Bram Stoker's Dracula, written by Richard Matheson).

Director Gary Shore and screenwriters Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless repeat the formula in Dracula Untold, but their mistake is making an entire movie out of this premise. If they had done their homework, they would know that the link to Vlad III is tenuous at best, and that the real and probably only reason Stoker used the name 'Dracula' is because he was under the mistaken impression that it meant 'devil' in Romanian (but who knows; maybe the confusion of ' Greek pi' with Albanian 'pi' was a tribute to this linguistic faux pas on the Irish author’s part).

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

6 /10

I think you have to treat this depiction of Dracula on it's own merits. There is no point comparing it with anything you've seen already. Given that, it is a perfectly watchable, and forgettable, adventure film with Luke Evans as Prince Vlad making the vampiric equivalent of a "deal with the devil" with Charles Dance to prevent his family and his kingdom from being over-run by the Turks. Dominic Cooper is really terrible as the Ottoman Sultan, though - his accent sounds like it's been finessed in his local kebab shop after too many tequila slammers on a Friday night. Evans is fine in the role, there is plenty of action and the visual effects are adequate too. Expect nothing earth shattering and you won't be let down.

Avis fournis par TMDB