Frogs backdrop
Frogs poster

FROGS

1972 US HMDB
March 10, 1972

Jason Crockett is an aging, grumpy, physically disabled millionaire who invites his family to his island estate for his birthday celebration. Pickett Smith is a free-lance photographer who is doing a pollution layout for an ecology magazine. Jason Crockett hates nature, poisoning anything that crawls on his property. On the night of his birthday the frogs and other members of nature begin to pay Crockett back.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: George Edwards (Producer)Peter Thomas (Producer)Norman T. Herman (Executive Producer)James H. Nicholson (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Robert Blees (Screenplay)Robert Hutchison (Screenplay)
Music: Les Baxter (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Mario Tosi (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Marco Castellini
On a small island populated by a few inhabitants, the exploited nature revolts against the reckless humanity and causes a massacre. An idea not very original supported by a decent direction, but never particularly inspired, and seasoned with more than a pinch of irony. The film never gives us real moments of "fear". Similar to the Hammer productions of the sixties, negligible and far from the tastes of the modern public.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (1)

Wuchak

Wuchak

5 /10

Lazy pre-"Jaws" nature-nuns-amok flick

Myriad swamp creatures (frogs, snakes, alligators, lizards, scorpions, tarantulas, crabs, etc.) vengefully attack a crotchety old man's Southern mansion in the swamp. Apparently, they’re hopping mad about the toxic chemicals used to exterminate them, not to mention pollutants in general. The film stars Ray Milland as the old grump, a mustache-less Sam Elliott and a young Joan Van Ark.

"Frogs" (1972) predates "Jaws" by a few years. The creators were obviously going for a swamp version of the basic "The Birds" plot. The difference is that "The Birds" is a first-rate flick whereas "Frogs" is second rate, which isn’t to say that it’s unprofessional or that there aren’t points of interest. Any fan of nature-runs-amok flicks should find something to like. The film gives you what you pay for: Real swamp locations with real swamp creatures horrifyingly attacking and killing people, not to mention a grand antebellum mansion and grounds.

The best thing is that the story is taken seriously. There's no silliness or camp to be seen as in, say, "Lake Placid" or "Crocodile" (2000). Another highlight is Joan Van Ark who’s quite fetching at 28 during shooting. Lynn Borden and Judy Pace are also worth mentioning in the feminine department. On the other side of the gender spectrum, there’s Elliott, who’s excellent as the low-key macho protagonist, as well as Adam Roarke and David Gilliam, amongst others.

The main problem with “Frogs” is that there isn't any suspense; the tone is curiously lazy. But if you're a fan of creatures-on-the-loose films or any of the cast members then you'll probably find something to appreciate. It has more originality than the many post-"Jaws" flicks and there are indeed a few horrifying parts. Just don't expect a Class A film like "The Birds" or much suspense and you won't be disappointed.

For any who complain that the name of the movie is inaccurate in light of the fact that there are various bog creatures attacking the people, not just frogs, think about it like this: The frogs are like little Napoléons sending their soldiers into the fray.

It runs 90 minutes and was shot entirely at Eden Gardens State Park, Florida, which is located on the panhandle 20 miles west of Panama City.

GRADE: C+

Reviews provided by TMDB