Grave of the Vampire backdrop
Grave of the Vampire poster

GRAVE OF THE VAMPIRE

1972 US HMDB
August 23, 1972

Vampire Caleb Croft has awakened from his unholy slumber -- with an insatiable lust for blood and the pleasures of the flesh.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Daniel Cady (Producer)
Screenplay: David Chase (Screenplay)
Music: Jaime Mendoza-Nava (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Paul Hipp (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
A couple had secluded themselves in a cemetery to flirt, but meanwhile, a vampire wakes up from his sleep, comes out of the tomb, and attacks the two, killing him and raping her. The girl became pregnant and nine months later gives birth to James, a baby she is forced to feed with her blood. Upon the woman's death, when her son is now an adult, James is overcome by the desire to avenge his mother, tracking down and killing his vampire father. Having identified the monster in Professor Lockwood, James enrolls in his university course to find the right moment to set a trap for him. Distributed in Italy by Avo Film on VHS with the title "La bara del vampiro", "Grave of the Vampire" is now known as "La tomba del vampiro", an alternative translation provided by Jubal Classic Video that distributed it on DVD. Based on the novel "The Still Life" by David Chase, "La tomba del vampiro" is a very poor film about vampirism directed in 1974 by the hard film specialist John Hayes. Very poor, which is not synonymous with a bad film, since Hayes brings to the screen some good ideas also proposed in recent times, unfortunately not developing them properly. The intro with the vampire's awakening that attacks the couple is pure 60s B-movie, the classic scene missing in every American drive-in horror film. Then the plot shows some very sharp arrows in its quiver showing a monstrous pregnancy, with a fetus that drains the mother from the womb (probably Stephenie Meyer never saw this film or read the novel it is inspired by, but "Breaking Dawn" comes much later) and a baby vampire fed by the mother with blood instead of milk (and here "Grace" by Paul Solet owes something...). The premises are really good and make up for the embarrassingly poor look of the entire operation. James, the baby vampire, grows up and his desire for revenge becomes the primary focus of the narration. But the premise is too brief and from this point on, the film bogs down in a series of long-windedness that tend to highlight only the macroscopic flaws of the film. Stagnant plot, errors of "consecutio temporum" narrative and unsuitable and overly canine actors are the stains that most evidently sully "La tomba del vampiro". From a certain point onwards - that is, when James arrives at university - the narration slows down until it stops in a series of scenes that do not actually advance the development of the narration, with the inevitable consequence of provoking mostly yawns. Some turns, then, like that of the seance, arrive a bit unmotivated and without a precise logic, betraying the succession of events up to that point. But perhaps the most painful note are the actors. With the exception of the good Michael Pataki ("Rocky IV"; "Halloween IV"), who plays the vampire, the others display admirable acting doggish qualities, starting with the muscular protagonist William Smith ("Apocalypse in Frogtown"; "Maniac Cop - Sadistic Cop"), inexpressive to the highest levels and too little credible (with his visible 40 years) as a college student. Sparingly violent, but with a very lively ending with a lot of free-style wrestling, Hayes' film can be appreciated in some ways but very negligible in others. Watch a clip from LA TOMBA DEL VAMPIRO
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

plato1123

Like Schindler's List... but with cheap makeup and vampire tropes. YEAAASSSSSSSW

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

5 /10

A young couple are making out in their car in a graveyard when all of a sudden they are set upon. The mysterious creature quite literally rips the car doors off, disposes of the man and drags the girl to a grave where he has his wicked way... Now I suppose after terrorising the planet for aeons, it was bound to happen sooner or later and so - a son is born and is suckled by his mother's blood until we spool on a few years and meet "James" (William Smith). Aware of his progeny, he has determined to track down and destroy his paternal beast and after some searching for a man who has changed identities many times, he alights on "Croft" (Michael Pataki). Can he defeat this powerful and malevolent foe before all before him become terminally covered in raspberry sauce? This is just one vampire film too far, I'm afraid. The acting and writing - such as they are - are truly terrible, with Smith making Bela Lugosi look animated. It is only ninety minutes but it really seems longer as it drags along drearily before concluding with a twist that could have, worryingly, screamed sequel had I not more faith in humanity. It's not even crass or funny, it's just poor.

Reviews provided by TMDB