House of Wax backdrop
House of Wax poster

HOUSE OF WAX

1953 US HMDB
April 16, 1953

A sculptor opens a wax museum to showcase the likenesses of famous historical figures, but quickly runs into trouble when his business partner demands the exhibits become more extreme in order to increase profits.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Bryan Foy (Producer)
Screenplay: Crane Wilbur (Screenplay)Charles S. Belden (Story)
Music: David Buttolph (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Bert Glennon (Director of Photography)J. Peverell Marley (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
A wax statue sculptor, immediately after securing funding to exhibit his works, is engulfed in an intentionally set fire by a dishonest partner. The laboratory and the statues are completely destroyed, and the sculptor is severely injured. Several years later, the sculptor, confined to a wheelchair and deprived of the use of his hands, opens a new wax museum, and at the same time, brutal murders occur, followed by the theft of the bodies from the morgue. Who is the mysterious disfigured killer? And why do the statues of the wax museum bear a great resemblance to the bodies stolen from the morgue? A rather faithful remake of the 1933 film of the same name directed by Michael Curtiz, "House of Wax" is also the film that launched Vincent Price as an icon of fantasy cinema (before this film, he had acted in "The Invisible Man Returns", a sequel to the famous "The Invisible Man" of 1933) after playing roles in films of the most varied genres. Moreover, this film also has the merit of being one of the first films to be shown in 3D, a technique that has since been widely used in fantasy/horror cinema, up to recent years, to counter the appeal that television was gaining with the public. "House of Wax" is a small classic of 1950s horror/thriller cinema, but unfortunately, it has not aged very well, unlike its contemporaries. To the modern viewer, this film may sometimes seem cloying, but it is undeniably full of charm for numerous stylistic solutions that, even today, remain highly valid. The strong stage presence of Vincent Price dominates the entire film, perfect in the role of the ambiguous sculptor, who from this moment will become a true star of the genre. Dutiful is the direction of De Toth, who in several points manages to create a perfect atmosphere of unease (above all, the scene of the morgue), supported also by an effective photography and a suggestive soundtrack. In contrast to these positive elements, some less fortunate solutions are found: some script choices are poorly aimed, especially building the story on the mystery related to the identity of the killer, when then the final solution turns out to be the most obvious and predictable, thus nullifying the sense of surprise that could have been induced in the viewer (but this is not an exclusive of this remake, since the original script of Curtiz's film also provided for it). Moreover, this film, despite its brief duration (just over 80 minutes), has some heavy drops in rhythm, especially in the central part, which do not manage to keep the viewer's attention and involve them properly. It is needless to underline the fact that this film, despite the theme treated and the ban on minors, is completely devoid of "strong" scenes, considering the period in which it was produced. In conclusion, "House of Wax" is a fascinating and generally well-made film, but, at times, not very engaging and not particularly suitable for viewers accustomed to the frenetic and visceral horror of the postmodern/contemporary era.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (1)

John Chard

John Chard

9 /10

In any format it's a genre highlight.

Henry Jarrod is a very talented sculptor of wax figures for a museum. But as the museum starts to flounder, Jarrod's partner, Matthew Burke, insists on taking a new direction, a row ensues and Jarrod is knocked unconscious. Burke seizes the opportunity to torch the museum and get the insurance money, with Jarrod still in the premises. Thought long since dead, Jarrod resurfaces, apparently wheel chair bound and with horribly burned hands. Opening up a new museum, his new figures (made by his protégé under his instruction) look ever more lifelike than before, could he be responsible for some despicable crimes in the area?

This marvellous film is a remake of the 1933 chiller, The Mystery Of The Wax Museum, directed by Michael Curtiz. Here this film is taken on by Andre de Toth, originally filmed in 3-D with the then bonus addition of Warner Phonic Sound, it's a picture that thankfully holds up real well even in its basic flat format. The reason it does hold up well is because director de Toth didn't get carried away with the gimmick, it's used sparingly so the narrative never gets lost amongst any trickery, and thus House Of Wax's excellently creepy story comes to the fore.

Having the ever supreme Vincent Price as your leading man (Jarrod) will always help your horror genre picture, and here he two folds the performance brilliantly. At first his Jarrod is charming and carrying a grace about his dedication to his craft, but then, devilment takes control as Price pumps creepy ardour into Jarrod's fractured mind. Quite a turn from Price who most definitely suffered for his art during the shoot, forced to do his own stunts (the 3D process needs more than one camera), he was involved in an accident that set him on fire and almost saw him crushed!Then there was the long and often painful make up sessions to get the desired effects of a burns victim, layers of rubber strangling his skin to the point of passing out, oh yes Vincent earned his money on this one!

We even get one of the earliest credited performances from Charles Bronson (here under his real name of Buchinsky) as Jarrod's assistant Igor, whilst fans of The Addams Family TV series will no doubt enjoy the performance of future Mortica, Carolyn Jones. The film was a big success on its release, and hugely popular with critics, and it's not hard to see why, because today it still stands proud as one of the finest exponents of classic horror, both as a story and as a technical construction. 9/10

Reviews provided by TMDB