Shutter backdrop
Shutter poster

SHUTTER

2008 US HMDB
March 21, 2008

A newly married couple discovers disturbing, ghostly images in photographs they develop after a tragic accident. Fearing the manifestations may be connected, they investigate and learn that some mysteries are better left unsolved.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Arnon Milchan (Executive Producer)Doug Davison (Producer)Takashige Ichise (Producer)Gloria Fan (Executive Producer)Sonny Mallhi (Executive Producer)Roy Lee (Producer)
Screenplay: Luke Dawson (Screenplay)
Music: Nathan Barr (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Katsumi Yanagijima (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Ben and Jane, newlyweds, move to Tokyo where Ben has received an attractive job offer as a fashion photographer. One evening, the couple is involved in a car accident in which they hit a woman wandering on the deserted road, but once they come to, Ben and Jane find no trace of the woman. In the following days, Jane begins to sense eerie presences that reveal themselves through photographs, and Ben starts suffering from an annoying pain at the base of his neck. Convinced that everything is connected to the mysterious accident, Jane begins investigating the identity of the presumably hit woman. Ladies and gentlemen, after the remakes "The Eye" and "Chiamata senza risposta" and before "Riflessi di paura", the Italian cinematic year welcomes another American remake of a recent cult of Eastern horror filmography: "Ombre dal passato". The original is titled "Shutter", it is a Thai ghost story directed in 2004 (but released in Italy in the summer of 2006) by the unpronounceable Banjong Pisanthanakun and Parkpoom Wongpoom, and represents an excellent example of a horror film based on a very successful tension and mystery. But it is known that every good success and every good idea of others is often devoured by the mecca of American cinema and re-proposed by the Hollywood machine to adapt to Western (or more specifically North American) culture and to avoid the annoying and often unprofitable distribution procedures of the original work. But as often happens, the remake does not have even a hint of the charm of the original work, and with this further demonstration called "Ombre dal passato", it is confirmed that "The Ring" was a very rare exception in a sea of useless mediocrity impressed on film. We Europeans are often lucky and have the opportunity to see both the original work and the remake, but for the American public this is not always the case, and the original film, although sometimes available in specialized stores with English subtitles, swims in perfect distributive invisibility that makes the remake the only version known to the public. And in cases like this, "Ombre dal passato" is a real pity because one ends up losing a very successful horror film in favor of a faded and hurried ghost story that is forgotten too quickly. The American version of "Shutter" could be easily retitled "Sciatter", just as it is pronounced, but not referring naturally to the shutter of the camera that is omnipresent in the film, but to underline the weakness of the feature film in question and the evident lack of enthusiasm with which it was completed. In practice, "Ombre dal passato" is the shadow (so to speak) of Thai "Shutter", like a blow-up, an enlargement, of the original in which the definition and overall clarity of the work are lost. The story, reworked by screenwriter Luke Dawson ("New York Stories"), is roughly similar to that of the inspiration film, but proceeds with the accelerator, eliminating any hint of psychological characterization and almost all the most purely horrific scenes of which Pisanthanakun and Wongpoom's film was pregnant. But the problem is that "Ombre dal passato" is still a bad movie regardless of the successful movie it draws inspiration from. The basic structure is the same as any other film belonging to the ghost story genre, especially of Asian origin (curse of a resentful ghost revealed-mediated by a technological element, investigation, discovery of the presumed truth, purification of the deceased's soul through the discovery of his hidden corpse, final twist), here alarmingly similar to that used by Robert Zemeckis for "Le verità nascoste". This well-known and predictable scaffolding supports a slow and rhythm-less film, completely devoid of any tension, incapable of creating scares even with the overused game of alternating sound planes. The horror-horror scenes have been completely avoided, and even the rarest appearances of the ghost (all relegated to the last minutes of the film) take place and resolve as if nothing is happening. To this is added a complete apathy of the two main actors, penalized by a screenplay that does not grant them the slightest characterization and forced to pronounce boring and banal dialogues. Then, if Rachel Taylor ("Il collezionista di occhi"; "Transformers") is at least physically suitable for the role of the little wife upset by Japanese ghosts, the perpetually childish and chubby face of Joshua Jackson ("The Skulls"; "Cursed # Il maleficio") does not make him credible at all in the role of the rising playboy photographer. For his part, the Japanese import director Masayuki Ochiai, already the author of the disturbing and cryptic "Infection", does not add the slightest personality to the project, producing the classic commissioned movie that this time is not even enhanced by any particular care of the photography or sets. The only advice that can be given is to overlook this boring supernatural thriller and perhaps recover (for those who haven't seen it yet) the original "Shutter", which offers a story articulated in a more convincing way and a series of beautiful scenes rich in tension.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus Disney Plus
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

John Chard

John Chard

7 /10

A heavy burden.

American remakes of Asian horror films have mostly struggled to win grace and favour with horror fans. Shutter is no exception, it has been met with the usual howls of derision, claims of it being pointless, loosing the horror essence of the original and etc. But what for someone like me who hasn’t seen the original?

I found Shutter to be much like how I found The Ring, the Naomi Watts starrer from 2002, a very effective chiller with a solid mystery to be unravelled at the core. The ghost is creepy – as are the various photographic links, the scares handled professionally by the makers, and the finale pays off with a startlingly chilling revelation that freaked me out; and I’m a middle aged man!

It’s far from perfect, the pace is a bit haphazard, logic goes out the window often, and cast performances are only adequate in the absence of “A” list stars to propel the story onwards. While it’s tough to hang your hat on the two principal players since the emotional empathy hasn’t been earned by them, courtesy of the writing. Yet with no frame of reference to raise expectation levels – or down them as well, this is a safe and sturdy spooker that does its job well enough. 7/10

The Movie Diorama

The Movie Diorama

4 /10

Shutter takes Polaroid remnants of the original without the stunning flash. This is a peculiar remake. During the towering heights of Hollywood westernising world-renowned Asian horrors, mostly from Japan and South Korea, Japanese director Ochiai opted to alter the story of Thailand’s arguably most famous eponymous horror with American actors, set in Japan. Western audiences apparently wouldn’t be spooked if the ghost haunting the main characters wasn’t a pasty white Japanese girl with luscious black hair and masses amount of eye liner. It’s a cluster of cultures, and whilst the end result isn’t exactly terrible, it’s far from being tolerably good. Because much like ‘The Grudge’, ‘One Missed Call’ and ‘Pulse’, the underlying sense of pointlessness becomes an overburden for everyone involved.

A photographer and his new bride travel to Tokyo where they accidentally smash into a girl standing in the middle of the darkened misty road (bare foot, might I add!). And so, through the ominous power of spirit photography, they become haunted. Specks of mysterious white vapours and the glistening sunlight against the camera lenses, being interpreted as ghostly entities attempting to communicate with the living. “The dead latch onto the flesh”.

Without changing the essence of the overall story too much, just minor details here and there, Ochiai manages to produce various suspenseful moments through the usage of anonymity. The ethereal cries of a haunting girl, the innocent humming of an eerie song and the most intense tonguing since Toad got struck by lightning back in ‘00. The supernatural elements work best when nothing is showed on screen. The dark room sequence when Megumi entered the room, although initially presumed to be Jane, was executed with enough slow-paced tension to become effective. Dropping a splinter of wood into a solution that causes a tsunami into the eyes? Ineffective. Electrocuting one’s self in a desperate attempt to rid the latched ghost? Well, I don’t need to tell you how stupid that is.

Dawson’s script is less than impressive. Masses amount of exposition and one-dimensional development that forced characters to be nothing more than tourists and amateur photographers. Seriously, Jane is the worst tourist. Shouting in the faces of locals exclaiming “excuse me, where do I go!?”. Is she oblivious to native languages? Like, she failed to even attempt one word in Japanese. That’s not Taylor’s fault, who isn’t the most talented actress in existence, but managed to bring out some surprising emotionality towards the film’s conclusion. Jackson on the other hand? Ehhh. He’s the kind of guy you want to slap for acquiring no personality. Just bland. His character’s best friends are pointless and sadly resorted to expendable deaths that suffered from no build-up.

The central mystery that powers the narrative does captivate, even if Ochiai’s direction made certain twists obvious due to extensive foreshadowing, and that’s the primary element for preventing this remake from venturing into the realms that we do not speak of. I’m looking at you ‘One Missed Call’ and ‘Pulse’!

So yes, Shutter is fine. As a film, it functions by itself with enough flash for the uninitiated. However, for those who have watched the original, you’re bound to find disfigurement within the composition of this photographic remake.

Reviews provided by TMDB