Secret Window backdrop
Secret Window poster

SECRET WINDOW

2004 US HMDB
March 12, 2004

Mort Rainey, a writer just emerging from a painful divorce with his ex-wife, is stalked at his remote lake house by a psychotic stranger and would-be scribe who claims Rainey swiped his best story idea. But as Rainey endeavors to prove his innocence, he begins to question his own sanity.

Directors

Cast

👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Gavin Polone (Producer)Ezra Swerdlow (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: David Koepp (Screenplay)
Music: Philip Glass (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Fred Murphy (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Marco Castellini

Secret Window

Writer Mort Rainey, shaken by his wife's betrayal, retreats to a secluded house by a lake in hopes of rebuilding his life and overcoming the creative block that relentlessly afflicts him. Shaking him from his lethargy comes the unexpected visit of a stranger named John Shooter: the mysterious man claims to be the author of a story published by the writer in the past and, accusing him of plagiarism, demands that the original ending he wrote be restored. Mort Rainey does not immediately realize that the encounter is destined to disrupt his existence and underestimates the threats without any concern. He will be forced to reconsider them seriously when mysterious events connected to the dark and unsettling figure of John Shooter begin to occur in his life and that of his ex-wife. Despite seeming on paper a sure bet to bet on without reserve, "Secret Window," the new film directed by David Koepp (screenwriter of major Hollywood hits like "Spider-Man," "Mission: Impossible," and "Panic Room"), turns out to be a real disappointment. And it is even more so considering the enormous potential at stake (including a capable screenwriter, an original story by the brilliant Stephen King, and a cast of considerable depth) that remain tragically unexpressed. It is a shame that, once the flavorful ingredients are mixed, the result only tastes like reheated soup, and the film settles on the tracks of simple mediocrity without ever managing to rise above it. The film moves with impressive slowness, aided by a flat and uninspired direction, and the atmosphere throughout the film is so devoid of pathos and tension that it leaves the poor viewer bewildered. Even in the moments where one might expect some surprise or a surge of tension, everything resolves into nothing or a sequence that is once again predictable and clichéd. For this reason, at several points during the viewing, there is a strong hope that "Secret Window" proceeds slowly only to resolve in a final lash that redeems it: in reality, despite the director's intention being precisely this and the final minutes being undeniably built to surprise the viewer, everything inexplicably tastes of déjà vu, of predictability, and of clichés. If the concluding idea could have been a winner when Stephen King wrote his story, in today's cinema, it aligns with a series of endings already seen in films of far greater depth, films we do not mention only to avoid spoiling the surprise for the three or four viewers who have not already understood from the trailer of "Secret Window" what its natural evolution will be. And it is almost certain that even for them, the final surprise will seem like a gift already received numerous times. Another small but great disappointment (and true substantial surprise of the film) is Johnny Depp's performance, usually impeccable in front of the camera (who can forget, for example, films like "From Hell," "Ed Wood," "The Mystery of Sleepy Hollow"?), but this time decidedly too over the top. The sly and insolent expressiveness that has often given depth to the characters he has portrayed contributes this time to ridicule a protagonist, the writer Mort Rainey, whom we should imagine tormented but whom we see too often expressing himself with awkward comic expressions bordering on the grotesque. "Secret Window," despite its excellent credentials, turns out to be, in the end, very little. Not all that glitters is gold...
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (4)

John Chard

John Chard

6 /10

You strike me as the kind of guy who's on the lookout for a head he can knock off with a shovel.

It's actually a film that shows both the good and bad sides of Johnny Depp and Stephen King adaptations to film form.

Depp plays a writer who whilst going through a divorce and living out in the country in isolation, is suddenly menaced by John Turturo, who claims he is the victim of plagiarism perpetrated by Depp. Mysteries and murky shenanigans to follow...

That the film, in spite of its flimsy heart, is watchable, is down to the two stars, both are filing in for eccentricities and spooky menace respectively. Yet it's a bit of a one trick pony and difficult to take seriously, while it's also surprisingly bloodless, negating the interest of the potential Stephen King blood-lust crowd. The reveal is something of a cheat given what has gone before, belief of suspension is so stretched to breaking point, you literally should be wondering just what all other characters were doing in the film?!

Still, Johnny and John, resplendent with weird hats and hairdo's, give good camera time and save David Koepp's movie from stinker damnation. 6/10

Reno

Reno

6 /10

A successful writer who accused of plagiarism.

It was based on the novel, though the original title makes more sense than this film. Maybe they wanted to avert the spoiler. But I don't think it would have affected much, because the twist comes at the final segment. The tale of a writer who is in the middle of divorce and now living alone is the lake house got threatened by a stranger, because according to him he stole his story. Followed by many unpleasant events, how he gets out of the trouble told in the next half.

Feels just an okay kind. Though Johnny Depp was good. The suspense was good, particularly in the first half, but later it comes falling down. The second half was average, the twist was not interesting enough. After some point, you might predict it, but the point is it was too familiar. I especially did not like the finale, it was like not in detail. Still a watchable film, because of the actor and for decently made. So I think worth a watch if you keep a low expectation.

6/10

Kamurai

Kamurai

7 /10

Really good watch, would watch again, and can recommend.

This is a great mystery / psychological thriller, but most of what makes it interesting is a spoiler.

They do a great job of creating the tension, or Johnny Depp does, as he's alone on screen for about half the movie. The rest of the cast is excellent and gives exactly what is needed to bring the movie, and the audience, to a natural conclusion.

Wuchak

Wuchak

6 /10

Suffering betrayal, an author faces challenges at his remote lake house

A successful writer (Johnny Depp) is finalizing divorce proceedings while working on a new book at his house on a lake in upstate New York when a hick from the Deep South shows up at his doorstep, accusing him of plagiarism. Maria Bello and Timothy Hutton are on hand as the wife and her beau.

“Secret Window” (2004) is a drama and crime mystery that morphs into thriller/horror in the last act. It was based on Stephen King’s novella, but director David Koepp changed the climax because “the ending is everything,” as the movie argues.

The locations are excellent (cited below) and the depiction of a writer’s mundane daily life is accurate, as well as amusing. Depp is always good while Gillian Ferrabee is a highlight on the female front in a cameo (as Fran Evans). It’s cut from the same cloth as "What Lies Beneath" and, maybe, "Cold Creek Manor,” yet mixed with the later “1922” and an angle that I can’t give away or it’ll ruin your experience (although it’s kinda obvious and predictable). I enjoyed the flick, but it’s underwhelming and won’t watch again. I prefer those other three, yet this isn’t far off.

The movie runs 1 hour, 36 minutes, and was shot at Bromont Sur Le Lac, Québec, which is about 45 miles east of Montreal, plus areas nearby, including the big city. Second unit work was done in New York City.

GRADE: B-

Reviews provided by TMDB