Señales backdrop
Señales poster

SEÑALES

Signs

2002 US HMDB
agosto 2, 2002

Graham Hess es un pastor protestante que vive con sus dos hijos y con su hermano, Merrill, una antigua estrella del béisbol que trabaja en una gasolinera. Tras la muerte de su esposa en un accidente de tráfico, Graham pierde la fe y, en consecuencia, abandona a sus feligreses. Una mañana, al despertarse, se encuentra con que sus hijos han hecho un descubrimiento escalofriante en los campos de maíz que rodean su granja.

Reparto

👍 👎 🔥 1 🧻 👑 (1)

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Equipo

Produccion: Sam Mercer (Producer)Frank Marshall (Producer)M. Night Shyamalan (Producer)Kathleen Kennedy (Executive Producer)
Musica: James Newton Howard (Original Music Composer)
Fotografia: Tak Fujimoto (Director of Photography)

RESEÑAS (1)

Adamo Dagradi
Un ex reverendo, viudo y con dos hijos a cargo, vive con su hermano en una granja aislada de Pensilvania. Una mañana, en su campo de maíz, aparece misteriosamente un gran pictograma, construido doblando los tallos en círculos y líneas. Los animales del lugar están nerviosos. La televisión ofrece informes que muestran cientos de otros signos similares, aparecidos en todo el mundo. ¿El fin del mundo? ¿Una invasión? Entre las nuevas promesas de Hollywood, M. Night Shyamalan se destaca como uno de los directores y guionistas más talentosos en circulación. Después de habernos regalado los sustos de "El Sexto Sentido" y la sutil, aunque brillante, reinterpretación del origen de un superhéroe en "Sin límites", ahora nos ofrece un futuro clásico de la ciencia ficción: "Signs". Su capacidad para manipular los clásicos, en este caso "La Guerra de los Mundos", en formas nuevas y asombrosas, es de rara e envidiable maestría. La película es un thriller de ciencia ficción tenso y convincente, lleno de sustos y escenas memorables. Shyamalan usa los silencios, las pocas luces y la oscuridad que se cierne sobre los campos para crear una atmósfera claustrofóbica, en la cual todo lo que no se ve, por una vez, da más miedo que lo visible y tangible. ¿Están llegando los extraterrestres? ¿Serán hostiles? La familia vive el drama mundial, paralelo al más íntimo de la pérdida de la fe del protagonista, desde el interior de la casa, con la televisión como único contacto con el exterior. Los amantes del gore saldrán decepcionados: en toda la película ni una gota de sangre, pero como "Los Otros" antes que él, "Signs", gracias a una dirección que encuentra en Hitchcock su nume tutelar, se pone en liza entre las mejores películas de suspense de los últimos años. Mel Gibson está en gran forma, convincente en su papel, al igual que su "hermano" Joaquin Phoenix, joven actor de gran talento destacado en "8mm". Los niños son muy buenos y crean con su padre un vínculo sufrido y creíble. Es precisamente el drama de los personajes, de su pasado y de sus elecciones futuras, lo que nos permite una inmersión de verdadero transporte en el crescendo de hechos inquietantes y literalmente aterradores que les afectará. Los diálogos son lentos, cuidados, estudiados para dar humanidad verdadera a las reacciones de personas comunes ante lo insondable, pausas bien ritmadas que preceden a los momentos repentinos de tensión. Y aquellos en el maíz no son los únicos signos de la película, ver para entender. Único defecto: un final no del todo convincente, pero decidirán ustedes mismos. Cine inteligente, minimalista (en el buen sentido), recorrido siempre por un humor subyacente y nunca fuera de lugar, el de Shyamalan es una bocanada de aire fresco en un panorama donde la originalidad escasea. Un placer escuchar los murmullos de tensión del público en la sala y los saltos en las sillas. Muy recomendado.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comentarios

Comentarios (0)

Dónde Ver

Streaming

Disney Plus Disney Plus

Alquilar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Comprar

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

RESEÑAS DE LA COMUNIDAD (7)

Wuchak

Wuchak

7 /10

Is it really about aliens?

M. Night Shyamalan's "Signs" (2002) is about a disillusioned ex-minister (Mel Gibson) who lives in the country with his son & daughter and brother (Juaquin Phoenix). The reasons for his disillusionment become clear as the story unfolds. When a mysterious crop circle is discovered in their cornfield they wonder if it's a prank or an alien invasion!

Although the plot deals with a possible alien invasion, the theme is faith. There are two general views of life: (1) That life and the universe are one big meaningless accident and you're just an insignificant bug that will soon be squashed out of existence and memory. And (2) that there's an intelligent design to the universe and, although it's somehow fallen (i.e. severely messed up), there IS meaning, love, hope and purpose, even if we are presently unable to fully comprehend it.

The film addresses the clash of these two opposing views. We've all experienced the conflict of these two positions within our OWN hearts; it's the clash of flesh (id) and spirit (super-ego). On the one hand, we WANT to believe the latter position, but life dishes out so much crap that we are seriously tempted to give-in to the former.

This is the struggle Gibson's character faces in the story. He's given up on God and is stumbling in the dark; he's just going through the motions to exist. His smile is mostly a facade.

Many people diss the film for an obvious plot hole regarding the alien's weakness, but Shyamalan's too talented to not realize this. It's a sign to what the film is really about (sorry; I couldn't resist).

SPOILER ALERT (Don't read further unless you've seen the film)

It's possible that the aliens aren't really extraterrestrials but rather demons from the underworld (the dark dimension) invading the physical realm to take as many victims as they can. The idea that they are aliens is just a mass deception and, remember, the devil is the "father of lies".

There are many clues: The spaceships are never seen, just lights in the sky (the devil's also called "the prince of the power of the air" in the bible). The "aliens" look decidedly demonic and have cloven hoofs. The “primitive method” of repelling the aliens is discovered in “three cities the Middle East” and is holy water, which is ordinarily used by Catholic & Episcopal exorcists against demonic manifestations (Shyamalan, by the way, attended Catholic & Episcopal schools). The daughter, Bo, was said to be a "gift from God" who is sensitive to impure (unholy) water. Her name in Old Norse means "to live" and she was able to discern the weapon of life needed to defeat the demonic menace. The dog and bird were clearly possessed. The crop circles are occultic symbols and possible portals to the underworld. The crop circle in the Hess cornfield resembles a pitchfork. When the disillusioned minister cries out to God that he hates him he actually displays his faith; after all, he has to believe in God in order to converse. At that precise moment his son recovers from the asthma attack and the news announcer declares that the "aliens" are retreating. You see, FAITH sends the enemy fleeing with their tails between their legs.

Also, we see evidence that the demons are personal in nature. The "alien" locked in the vet's pantry was linked to the guilt and disillusionment that haunted the vet and the minister after the death of the latter's wife.

Also, we see evidence that the demons are personal in nature. The "alien" locked in the vet's pantry was linked to the guilt and disillusionment that haunted the vet after the death of the minister's wife.

Keep in mind that when the film debuted, Shyamalan was known as the king of the plot twist, yet the revelation that the aliens’ weakness is water wasn’t exactly a mind-blowing turn seeing as how the earth is 71% water and technologically advanced aliens who can travel the galaxy would know this. Moreover, the aliens curiously have no physical weapons and are easily trapped by a pantry door. It stands to reason that Shyamalan hid the twist in the movie. That twist is that the aliens are really demonic in nature.

I'm not saying you can't view the movie as a literal extra-terrestrial invasion flick, but rather that the underlying demonic reading is a legitimate way of viewing the material because it all ties together and links to the story arc of the disillusioned ex-minister finding redemption. Also, I'm not suggesting that you have to believe in God to appreciate this movie, which is obviously not the case.

BOTTOM LINE: This is a quality Shyamalan film and is about on par with "The Sixth Sense" and "The Village.”

The film runs 106 minutes and was shot in Eastern Pennsylvania.

GRADE: B+

tmdb15435519

7 /10

Not my favorite M. Night Shyamalan film. Also not my least favorite...

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

6 /10

It's barely over an hour and a half this film, but it seems much longer. Mel Gibson ("Graham") is a widowed former pastor who lives on a farm with his two kids "Morgan" (Rory Culkin) and "Bo" (Abigail Breslin) and his brother "Merrill" (Joaquin Phoenix). Their lives are all rolling along normally until one morning they discover some crop circles amongst the corn fields. Dismissing them as hoaxes, they are intrigued when television reports suggest a proliferation of these things all around the world. Now add to their now heightened suspicions some late night noises and mysterious happenings, and the family begin to suspect that they are being watched - and that their observer is not exactly benign. The last ten minutes or so redeem this story to a degree, but for the most part it is a terribly slow burn of a film. There isn't really much by way of action; Gibson and Phoenix don't really exude much of a compelling sibling relationship and the kids - usually a crucial conduit for M. Night Shyamalan stories have much less to work with here. This has more of the melodrama to it - the backstory of tragedy and grief all gets in the way of the gradually increasing sense of menace and I found the whole momentum of the story quite staccato. This is an adequate film, but it is definitely nobody's best work.

tmdb93836550

9 /10

This is one of my favourite films ever and a top 2 spot for my favourite thrillers. Signs isn't you're average Alien film, it focuses solely on a widowed reverend and his family but it is still one of the best films ever made and one you can watch over and over and it never bores.

RalphRahal

7 /10

Rewatching M. Night Shyamalan's Signs brought back the same feelings I had the first time I saw it. The script is solid, the plot is engaging, and the acting, especially from Mel Gibson, is strong. Joaquin Phoenix adds a lot to the movie too, balancing emotional moments with some light humor. But even with all these positives, the movie still feels like it’s missing something—a spark that could’ve made it truly great.

The story is told entirely from the family’s perspective, which creates a lot of suspense and intimacy. However, it also leaves the aliens feeling underdeveloped. We never learn much about their intentions, behavior, or even why they’re invading Earth. That final scene with the alien and the child is particularly intriguing. Some theories suggest it wasn’t attacking but might actually have been saving the boy. The alien didn’t defend itself when Joaquin Phoenix’s character hit it, which raises questions about its true motives. This ambiguity adds an interesting layer but also feels like a missed opportunity for the story to dig deeper.

Overall, Signs is a well-made movie with strong themes of faith, family, and survival.

ezra

4 /10

this movie's genuinely convinced it's suspenseful when it's really just a hunk of boring tropes with some christianity thrown on top. it took the whole hitchcock "don't show the monster" way too far, and i audibly laughed when we finally saw the alien. like... THAT'S what you were keeping hidden for the majority of the film? and everyone's so freaked out by it. to be fair, it made my mom shriek, but i could not take this film seriously. especially with all the dialogue about profanity. i can't tell if that was included as a joke, but it was funny. and i'm ex-religious, i grew up saying heck and frick, still didn't relate to any of it. overall just seemed kind of preachy as well. nothing stuck out about this film artistically.

i'd recommend signs for bad movie night, it's definitely fun to make fun of.

tender_buttkiss

3 /10

I guess I just don't see what others see in this movie. It's pretty mediocre at best. Not scary and kinda lame duck story.

Reseñas proporcionadas por TMDB