The Conjuring 2 backdrop
The Conjuring 2 poster

THE CONJURING 2

2016 US HMDB
June 8, 2016

Lorraine and Ed Warren travel to north London to help a single mother raising four children alone in a house plagued by malicious spirits.

Directors

Cast

Comments

Crew

Production: Toby Emmerich (Executive Producer)Richard Brener (Executive Producer)Dave Neustadter (Executive Producer)Rob Cowan (Producer)Peter Safran (Producer)Walter Hamada (Executive Producer)Steven Mnuchin (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Chad Hayes (Story)Carey Hayes (Story)James Wan (Story)David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick (Screenplay)
Music: Joseph Bishara (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Don Burgess (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Vincenzo de Divitiis

England, 1977. Paggy Hodgon is a divorced woman and mother of four children with whom she lives in a council house on the outskirts of London, precisely in the district of Enfield, not without financial difficulties to make ends meet and feed her little ones every day. As if that were not enough, the situation worsens when strange events begin to occur in the house and the spirit of the former tenant possesses one of her daughters, Janet, to manifest his will not to leave his home. The case, which meanwhile has gained national attention earning the nickname "Amityville" English, reaches the ears of the Vatican which tasks the two paranormal experts Ed and Lorraine Warren to investigate the veracity of the phenomena and find a solution if they are authentic. Thus begins a long struggle between good and evil that does not only involve the spirit that is inside the little Janet, but also a very powerful demon that torments Lorraine since the times of the last investigation of "Amityville" and who has predicted a tragic end for a person dear to her. Director, screenwriter, producer: these are the many roles that James Wan plays within contemporary horror, a scene in which over the years he has imposed himself on the attention of the public and critics as one of the most talented and important contemporary masters. An ascent that began with the beautiful first chapter of the "Saw – The Puzzle" saga, slightly hindered by the discreet "Dead Silence," and finally brought to its peak by the two "Insidious" and, above all, "The Conjuring- The Summoning" dated 2013. The latter, based on a case actually faced by the paranormal experts Ed and Lorraine Warren, not only offered peaks of good horror cinema – something not taken for granted these days – but also gave rise to one of the most flourishing franchises of the moment, as demonstrated by the mediocre "Annabelle" inspired by the doll present in the basement of the two spouses. A similar success could not fail to lead to the realization of a sequel that, punctual as a Swiss watch, arrived with the direction of its father James Wan, who in the meantime had taken a break from the genre dedicating himself to the engines and muscles of "Fast & Furious." Never was a return so beneficial as this sequel is a really remarkable film and really scares you to the point of warning the most impressionable people of the danger of a sleepless night. The points in favor of this "The Conjuring- The Enfield Case" are many, but let's start with the most immediate and easy to see with the naked eye. Wan's handling of tension is as usual perfect thanks to the gloomy and dark atmospheres that do not make the danger perceptible thus creating a sense of disorientation that leaves the viewer in a continuous state of anxiety from the beginning to the end, accentuated by the always excellent music of the faithful Joseph Bishara characterized by acute sonorities and always in step with the different moments of the story. Numerous are, in fact, the memorable sequences that stand on one of the most unsettling figures of recent years, namely the statuesque demon dressed as a nun who torments Lorraine and rises as the protagonist of what is an important subplot of the film. The story, in fact, moves on two parallel tracks, the affair of the Hodgson family and the shock suffered by Lorraine during the last seance in the house of "Amytiville," which intertwine wonderfully with each other and at various points are complementary to each other. But such an ambitious operation, of immense duration for a horror film (133 minutes), could not fail to have some cracks in the plot development that in the long run is not the maximum of originality and, above all, collapses miserably in a disappointing, rushed and superficial resolution of the possession and lacking the expected final climax. In short, the idea of immersing the public in a spiral of terror from the start turns out to be a boomerang as it is very difficult to maintain the same rhythm for so many sequences. Despite these minor flaws, Wan's new work is promoted with high marks also thanks to a cast in which Vera Farming confirms that the character of Lorraine suits her perfectly and the revelation is represented by the young Madison Wolfe, very skillful in the role of a possessed child among the most frightening and credible of recent decades. If you want to see a horror film of good quality and written also with the right care of details, "The Conjuring – The Enfield Case" is the film for you and warmly recommended. Wan has hit the mark once again!

Comments

Where to Watch

Stream

Netflix Netflix
Sky Go Sky Go
Now TV Now TV
HBO Max HBO Max
HBO Max Amazon Channel HBO Max Amazon Channel

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (7)

Reno

Reno

8 /10

This time a London family struggle in their haunted house.

First of all, I am not a big fan of the first film, but I liked that. Now this sequel was not bad either. This time it takes us to the London. But the film reminded me the 80s film 'Poltergeist', particularly the second part. So don't assume it is exactly the same, only the scenes involving house seems similar, but the story was different. It is another true story based film, that's what they said in the opening statement. You're not forced to believe that, if you're here for an entertainment, you will get that if you put your logics away for the two hours.

A family of four young children and their mother living in a house in the London witness some serious paranormal activities lately. Particularly the eleven year old girl affected the most with the spirit the house possessed. So the American couple from the first film are brought in to do their best to help the family. When they try to contact the spirit, they won't get what they were looking for. Instead, an unexpected blame goes for the girl and soon the family loses confidence in them. The overcoming those misunderstanding, particularly realising the truth brings a twist before concluding the tale.

The one twenty minute never looked too long. Because there's always something keeps happening, so the audience to keep engaged with. Probably this is won't be your best horror film of the years, but being a horror themed film, it had good form of those contents. Not too scary, at a time those clichés were used in a good way to bring freshness in the scenes. I will credit the writers for that. Besides, the actors were undoubtedly good, including those little ones. For me this is a better horror film and I definitely look for another sequel. I hope this one would stand up to your expectations.

7.5/10

Gimly

Gimly

6 /10

I know I'm in the minority on this, but I actually preferred it to the original.

Final rating:★★★ - I personally recommend you give it a go.

Sheldon Nylander

Sheldon Nylander

6 /10

I'm giving this half a star more than I gave the first movie. As a horror film in its own rite, it's competently made, although somewhat predictable as it follows most of the traditional haunted house film tropes. But it is better than the first one in that it's a more cohesive film, with such corrections as how the background "monster" actually does play a part in the story, whereas in the first film Annabelle was shoehorned in but had nothing to do with the main story and served only as a distraction.

Ultimately, the reason I can't rate this film higher is because it's about the Warrens, who were a couple of charlatans that took advantage of vulnerable and desperate people. While this is touched on briefly, it's done more in the context of people who don't believe them are all mean and unsympathetic.

Again, it's a competently made horror film that's better than its predecessor, if a little predictable, but don't look at it as being based on a true story. Take it with a massive grain of salt.

JPV852

JPV852

8 /10

Really solid sequel, and a re-watch before seeing the third film, in fact probably liked this one slightly better, with some good scares but better, a nice heart at the center with the relationship between Ed and Lorraine, played wonderfully by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga. Once again, craft-fully directed by James Wan, a style missing from the others in the 'Conjuring Universe', though the plots didn't help matters. 4.0/5

GenerationofSwine

GenerationofSwine

1 /10

This is rated "R" and it's hard to believe...but let's face it, scary movies just aren't that scary anymore.

Not that many of them ever were. And even then few have actually provided the constant nightmares of The Exorcist...

But The Conjuring 2 feels like it's going for the PG scares to not lose audiences.

The potential is there, but the director is flying with one hand on the chicken switch and pulls out of everything that's not worse than a jump-scare.

We have the potential for an actual psychologically thrilling horror story here, but its a wasted potential.

Ultimately, like every other horror movie made of late, it seems afraid to actually frighten people.

Still, it's better than the torture porn on the market

r96sk

r96sk

4 /10

<em>'The Conjuring 2'</em>, oof. What a chore to sit through. The only redeeming quality I have for this film is Madison Wolfe's performance as Janet, which is fairly impressive for a youngster. That aside, I have nothing that I can praise or even mark as better than mid, sadly.

The 2hr+ run time obviously doesn't help, but that actually isn't even a major negative for this movie. The plot, which feels like a rehash of the 2013 original in most (if not all) areas, is just so bloated and boring, I initially thought the English-ify of the story would bring freshness but, aside from the amusingly bad cockney accents, it's barely noticeable when in yet another dingy house.

<b>[bit of a spoiler on the way]</b>

The demons felt like a drop-off from the first flick, I admit the Bill character turned out to be a tiny bit more interesting than I thought it was going to be early on. Even then, I wanted a little bit of resolution with Bill once 'the end' happens (with Anita too). Unless it happened and I was already mentally zoned out by then, possible I guess?

I think another thing that affects my enjoyment is the lack of jeopardy for the human characters, once is fine but back-to-back? Like they put all the pieces in place to kill one of them off and then just bottle it right at the last minute; this one here, for example, would've been very meaningful too. That dog in the original must feel extremely hard done by, ought to sue thy agent. I suppose it needs to cling to the "true event" (lol).

Ah, I've just checked the general reception this received. Wow! Most of the time I question myself when I see that I am in the minority, I gotta be honest this time its on you guys - please do send me whatever it is you lot are smoking though! Joking aside, it would appear I'm in the wrong, the majority view speaks for itself, but damn... surprised to say the least!

Just remembered that I did actually say in my review of <em>'Annabelle'</em> (5/10) hours ago that if it was any longer then I would've disliked it more. Well, step forward this movie. I didn't think the proof would arrive in the pudding so soon.

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

7 /10

This second cinema outing for the ghost-busting Warren’s takes them to London’s northern district of Enfield where the Hodgson family are having a fairly torrid time. Younger daughter Janet (Madison Wolfe) and her elder sister Margaret (Lauren Esposito) have been pining for their absent father and so rather optimistically consult a home-made ouija board to find out if he is ever going to return home again! Their mum Peggy (Frances O’Connor) and the audience know that he’s shacked up with a woman round the corner with their new set of twins. Anyway, Janet goes to sleep and that’s the beginning of their nightmare as an old gent (Bill) who reputedly died in an armchair in the house decides to revisit the family, rearrange the furniture, change the television channels and generally cause mayhem for this cash-strapped family. Meantime, Ed Warren (Patrick Wilson) has been painting a fetching portrait of a nun (think the art-loving Sister Wendy Beckett from the mid-1990s) who seems to be the source of some discomfort for wife Lorraine (Vera Farmiga). Might these two mysteries be connected? Well the church asks the pair to do some surreptitious investigations in the UK and so off they go. Of course they are sceptical, but when a bit of levitation creeps in, the doors start to slam of their own accord and the water supply seems intent on building them an indoor swimming pool in the basement, they begin to wonder if Janet et al are really hoaxers, or might there actually be something altogether more malevolent at work here. According to local sources here, the Warren’s spent hardly any time at all at the house and so much of the substance to this story is unsubstantiated conjecture, but James Wan still manages to create something plausibly scary as these children and their mother - at her wits end - try to deal with this unwelcome phenomena. It’s end-to-end stuff with the girls also delivering spookily (and shriekingly) as the shadows come alive with well-mixed audio effects and some false teeth with a mind of their own. Wilson and Farmiga over-egg their earnestness a bit at times, but as the “McMillan and Wife” of the occult, they do well enough to send the odd tingle up and down your spine. It’s probably half an hour longer than it needs to be - there’s a wee bit too much preamble, but it’s certainly at the better end of the genre for my money.

Reviews provided by TMDB