Zombie Flesh Eaters backdrop
Zombie Flesh Eaters poster

ZOMBIE FLESH EATERS

Zombi 2

1979 IT HMDB
August 25, 1979

After an abandoned boat sails into New York harbor with a zombie aboard, a reporter teams up with the daughter of the boat's missing owner to investigate the island where he was last seen conducting research—the site of an alleged zombie outbreak.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Ugo Tucci (Producer)Fabrizio De Angelis (Producer)
Screenplay: Elisa Briganti (Writer)
Music: Fabio Frizzi (Original Music Composer)Giorgio Cascio (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Sergio Salvati (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Francesco Mirabelli
Francesco Mirabelli
A small unmanned vessel arrives at the port of New York. The boat belonged to the father of a girl named Ann Bowles (Tisa Farrow), who decides to travel to the island of Matul in the Antilles in search of her missing parent. She is joined by journalist Peter West (Ian McCulloch) and a pair of oceanographers, Brian Hull (Al Cliver) and Susan Barret (Auretta Gay). On the same island, where Dr. Menard (Richard Johnson) and his wife Paola (Olga Karlatos) are staying, the corpses rise from the dead and attack the living. With "Zombi 2," Lucio Fulci ventures into the realm of horror for the first time—the genre he would become most closely associated with and to which he owes his fame. Thanks to this turn (admittedly reductive, given all the themes he explored across over 50 films), he would earn prestigious titles like "godfather of gore" and "poète du macabre." Fulci's entry into the genre that would make him famous was actually quite accidental. "Zombi 2," on paper just a quick cash-grab sequel to Romero's "Zombi," was first offered to Joe D'Amato and Enzo G. Castellari. When both declined, Fulci's name came up—a director who had fallen into obscurity and was recycling himself directing TV programs starring a washed-up Franco Franchi. Thanks to Fulci, what should have been another forgettable exploitation film riding the coattails of a famous movie became one of the most successful zombie films in cinema history, as well as a massive commercial success: made for just 410 million lire, it earned 30 million dollars worldwide, and according to many sources, in certain countries it actually outgrossed Romero's film! Between "Zombi" and "Zombi 2," it must be said, the similarities exist only in the title and the presence of the undead. One of Fulci's strengths was certainly his ability to create original, personal works despite operating within commercial constraints and treading paths already marked by others before him. This admirable quality accompanied him from his earliest days in cinema—whether directing a western, he would try to make it differently from Leone's, or if making a thriller, he would do everything possible not to be compared to his rival Argento. Regarding "Zombi 2," the Roman director liked to say that his was a true zombie film and not a sociological one like Romero's, where the undead symbolized the new society devouring the old. Another original aspect of the film was bringing the zombie figure back to its original roots: classic voodoo. Beyond being a straightforward adventure film devoid of political-social metaphors, another distinction of Fulci's work lies in the characterization of the true protagonists: the zombies. While Romero's zombies look quite similar to the living in physical appearance and clothing, Fulci's zombies are made up to look like corpses already in decay, their clothes reduced to rags, thereby emphasizing the difference from the living. Their realization, entrusted to the great Giannetto De Rossi, is one of the film's best elements and proves even more striking than the more prestigious American counterpart. De Rossi also handles the extraordinary gore effects, which have greater impact than those, however notable, of the overseas competition. Among the splatter scenes, it's impossible not to mention the famous one, a true anthology piece of horror—Olga Karlatos's pierced eye: a scene masterfully executed both in special effects and direction, with considerable fluidity. Another famous, though debatable, scene is the shark-versus-zombie fight in the ocean depths. The sequence is certainly effective and deserves credit for presenting the zombie in an unprecedented aquatic setting (an intuition that director Ken Wiederhorn would later fully exploit in his "Zombie Island Massacre"). However, this wasn't shot by Fulci but inserted later at the producer's insistence to capitalize on the success of Spielberg's "Jaws"—it was Giannetto De Rossi who directed it. As for the cast, while not exactly world-class, their performances are perfectly functional to the story, especially since the zombies are ultimately the true stars, and the psychological characterization of the humans is minimal. The few characters with any depth are entrusted to the better actors: Olga Karlatos, cast as the unfortunate wife of Dr. Menard, and Richard Johnson as David Menard, a man incapable of surrender to the inconceivable and enslaved to rigid, preconceived rationality that never comprehends the dead resurrect not through science but through voodoo—a "stubborn rationalist" typical of Fulcian films. An interesting anecdote concerns the scene shot near the Brooklyn Bridge: filming permission hadn't actually been granted (or rather, wasn't even requested). Fulci's ingenuity devised a stratagem worthy of his reputation: he had extras dressed in rags with improvised makeup pass in front of the camera at dawn to avoid detection by authorities. Immediately after, the extras were hastily loaded onto a van so no one would notice they'd been there. "Zombi 2" is ultimately a modest film, but it's very well made and possesses tremendous personality. Proof of its quality lies simply in the problems it caused poor Romero, who had to delay the release of his "Day of the Dead" precisely because of this Italian film. It's a film with characteristics that strongly recall Fulci's qualities: a humble craftsman who, when inspiration struck, would raise his head and prove capable of matching even the great masters.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (3)

John Chard

John Chard

6 /10

Fulci’s Feral Food Feast.

Being of a “certain” age and being British, I was firmly around at the time of the ridiculous “video nasty” mania that swept the UK in the early 1980s. Films that usually involved cannibals, either ferox, holocaust or zombified, and torture porn revengers et al, were banned, prosecuted or given a Viking burial at sea. One such film was Zombie Flesh Eaters (the best title the film has of the few it is known by), it became like the Holy Grail of video nasties, where to see it uncut would be like witnessing the last miracle performed by Christ. I never did get to see it back then, and as my horror leanings waned over the years I let it drift from my conscious. But now I’m here in my middle age and finding a new appetite for horror, I have finally managed to see the fabled shocker from Lucio Fulci.

In many ways it’s a disappointment, I mean I understand that to view it now is never going to impact in the way that it did (could) in 1979, but casting aside for a moment the gore scenes, which I will get to, it’s a bad film awash with badness, and not in a horror bad ass way. Much like the other Fulci film I viewed recently, The House By The Cemetery, ZFE is a series of blood and guts scenes strung together by amateurish filler. Be it bad acting, bad dubbing, hopeless dialogue and half hearted attempts at something cranial. However, if judging this particular Fulci film on its key horror scenes? Then it’s got brains, imagination and style to burn. Marking it out as by definition a mixed bag genius disaster!

The zombies themselves are brilliant creations, all dripping with rotting flesh, caked in earth and having mother nature’s insect creatures wriggling around their ravaged bodies. They shuffle along in classic Romero mode, and feast on flesh with carefree abandon. They are also perpetrators of some of zombie cinema’s best moments, such as fighting a shark on the ocean bed, pulling a hapless female victim onto a wooden splinter – eye first! And one scene where they collectively rise slowly from the earth is atmospherically as creepy as it is stunning in its execution. It is these things that of course helped to make it a legendary part of the Italian Exploitation era, and it’s these things that make it watchable still today, but let it not be said there is anything else worthwhile, because the rest is simply awful. 6.5/10

quasar1967

quasar1967

10 /10

in my opinion, quite simply the best CLASSIC zombie movie ever made

Wuchak

Wuchak

6 /10

Adventurous zombie outbreak in the Caribbean

A woman from New York City (Tisa Farrow) teams-up with a reporter (Ian McCulloch) to find her missing father on a remote island in the West Indies. They hire a vacationing couple to guide them (Al Cliver and Auretta Gay), which leads to a troubled doctor who knew the man (Richard Johnson).

Helmed by Lucio Fulci, "Zombie" (1979) or “Zombie Flesh Eaters” is also known as “Zombi 2” in several countries because producers wanted to capitalize on the success of “Dawn of the Dead” from the year before, which was known as “Zombi” in Italy and other lands. With such a title, it’s implied to be an (unofficial) sequel to “Dawn” but, in reality, it’s a prequel (not to mention a prequel to “Night of the Living Dead”).

The script was actually written before “Dawn” came out as an adventure/thriller taking place in the Caribbean with no connection to Romero's films. The bookend New York scenes were added later to cash-in on “Dawn.” Dardano Sacchetti based his script on classic zombie flicks with the intention of bringing the genre back to its Caribbean & Voodoo roots.

Although the story isn’t as compelling as in “Dawn” (or “Night”) and the characters aren’t as memorable, the zombies have better make-up and are thoroughly gruesome. It’s basically “Night of the Living Dead” with the milieu of “The Deep” and the enhancement of full color. Unfortunately, the dubbing is lousy, which is to be expected with Italian films of that era.

Whilst the eye poke scene strikes me as juvenile and dumb, it is well-done and horrific, which fits the genre. Beyond that, there are several highlights, such as the creative tiger shark sequence, the air of life-or-death adventure and the suspenseful stand-off at the climax, as well as the ominous epilogue.

It runs 1 hour, 31 minutes, and was shot in New York City, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Latina, Italy, which is 45 miles south of Rome.

GRADE: B-/C+

Reviews provided by TMDB