War of the Worlds backdrop
War of the Worlds poster

WAR OF THE WORLDS

2005 US HMDB
June 28, 2005

Ray Ferrier is a divorced dockworker and less-than-perfect father. Soon after his ex-wife and her new husband drop off his teenage son and young daughter for a rare weekend visit, a strange and powerful lightning storm touches down.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 1 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Colin Wilson (Producer)Kathleen Kennedy (Producer)Damian Collier (Executive Producer)Paula Wagner (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: David Koepp (Screenplay)Josh Friedman (Screenplay)
Music: John Williams (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Janusz Kamiński (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
A series of terrifying lightning strikes heralds the awakening of some gigantic alien machines that begin to sow panic among humans. The worker Ray Ferrier will attempt to escape the hostile intentions of the invaders and save his two children whom his ex-wife had left with him for the weekend. "War of the Worlds" is one of the most famous titles in the history of science fiction, but not only in cinema. In 1898, H.G. Wells wrote a short novel that became a great success and is still recognized today as a classic; the title of the novel was precisely "War of the Worlds". But the public success and the reputation of a classic were increased by a curious episode that entered the history of mass communications as a perfect example of how the media can influence the public's consciousness. It was 1938 and a young Orson Welles conducted the radio broadcast "Mercury theatre on air"; on October 30, Welles decided to read "War of the Worlds" live, narrating it as if it were a radio news broadcast. The result was that many listeners believed that the Martians had actually attacked the United States and in a small town in New Jersey (the place that Welles had described as the scene of the event) mass panic even broke out. "War of the Worlds" first appeared in cinema in 1953 in the eponymous film directed by Byron Haskin. The film was a huge box office success and is considered one of the best science fiction films of the 1950s, even winning an unexpected Oscar for special effects. In 2005, with the intention of evoking and exorcising the ghosts of September 11, Steven Spielberg attempts the remake card and we find ourselves facing a new "War of the Worlds". In reality, Spielberg has done more than a simple remake; he has completely reinvented a story already known, giving it a new depth and a new meaning, as well as the unsettling realism that only modern special effects can confer. First of all, Spielberg visibly deviates from the original genre to which "War of the Worlds" belongs and thus contaminates classic science fiction with modern disaster cinema and the more typical suggestions of horror. "War of the Worlds" can therefore be considered for many reasons to also belong to the horror genre, becoming in some points really unsettling, such as in the very successful scene of the boat or the long sequence in the basement. Elements of desperate terror and pessimism emerge from the macabre scene of the bodies in the river or the apocalyptic train on fire that crosses the level crossing. Of course, "War of the Worlds" is essentially a Spielberg film and although it belongs to "adult" Spielberg, one can read an innate underlying goodwill, further emphasized by a somewhat ineffective moralistic framework (directly from the novel). The theme dearest to Spielberg, namely the family, is also present here and is explained through the disastrous family situation of Ray, played by a convincing Tom Cruise. Ray Ferrier is a worker with a failed marriage behind him and two children. His ex-wife (played by Miranda Otto) has remarried and periodically brings her children to Ray, as decided by the court. But Ray has a difficult relationship with his children, especially with the older one, a teenager who considers his father a failure. Therefore, Spielberg presents us with a broken family, somewhat distant from his usual optics of a happy family embodying the achievement of the American dream, although, as is the classic tradition, horror and the situation of danger will at least partially mend family relationships. If the characters of the new "War of the Worlds" have been completely rewritten compared to the old version and the tone seems definitely more adult and less "pop" compared to the past, the basic goal may nevertheless seem similar. Essentially, the two films are equivalent as a metaphor for rampant xenophobia. In Haskin's film, the alien invasion, which begins precisely in the United States, was read as a metaphor for the fear of a communist victory during the Cold War (not coincidentally, the aliens come from Mars, the red planet, the color symbol of communism). The same reading, often abused, was attributable to a good part of the science fiction films produced in those years and it seems that this "political-social" tendency has returned punctually following the US intervention in the Middle East and the terrorist attacks against the West. In the 2005 version of "War of the Worlds", the true horror emerges precisely from the catastrophe, the destruction that the alien invasion causes to man and his territory. In a significant scene, the young Dakota Fanning, who plays Ray-Cruise's daughter, terrified asks her father if they are in the middle of a terrorist attack. Beyond any sociological reading, Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" is nevertheless an excellent entertainment film, adequately exciting and adrenaline-pumping. Excellent direction, excellent actors, and excellent special effects. Perhaps the look of the aliens is slightly disappointing, too little unsettling in their physical appearance, especially when compared to their mechanical extensions, the tripods (but the look of the Martians in Haskin's film is also disappointing), but the choice to make them a sort of vampires is certainly spot on. Great spectacle and fundamental piece in the renewed trend of contaminating fantastic cinema with contemporary societal fears: "War of the Worlds" is a remarkable film and, although far from perfect, deserves more than one viewing.
👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Mediaset Infinity Mediaset Infinity
Timvision Timvision
Paramount Plus Paramount Plus
Paramount+ Amazon Channel Paramount+ Amazon Channel
Infinity Selection Amazon Channel Infinity Selection Amazon Channel

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (4)

Peter McGinn

Peter McGinn

8 /10

I enjoyed this entry into the HG Wells film library. The special effects are great (to this amateur anyway) and the acting and action more than adequate. Plus it stays near enough to the sci-fi genius of the author to satisfy the fans of the classic novel. I will say that I got a little tired of the son acting like such a teenager, but he and the Tom Cruise character both show some character growth by the end of the film. Tom is one of those actors who seems to be playing himself a lot, but I suspect there is a lot more work to it than that. I'm not sure Dustin Hoffman would have gotten his Academy Award for Rain Man if he had played off a lesser actor than Cruise.

I think there are a couple of scenes the movie could have done without, such as in the cellar with Cruise, his daughter and the man who lived there. It slowed the story down, changed the tenor of the drama, and didn't add a lot, in my view. But it is what it is and overall I found War of the Worlds to be entertaining. Good science fiction movies can be hard to find.

JPV852

JPV852

5 /10

First time seeing this in 15 years and lame plot, annoying characters (both kids got on my nerves) and a protagonist who just runs around, as Tom Cruise does so well, but has zero impact on the end game which was... bacteria. Yeah, this was just as dumb today as it was back then. At least the visual effects and sound design still holds up. 2.5/5

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

6 /10

Sometimes it just pays to leave well alone, and this remake of the 1953 version adds nothing aside from more sophisticated special effects. A vehicle for Tom Cruse, it allows Stephen Spielberg to turn this menacing and thought-provoking sci-fi classic into a family melodrama with the star and his dysfunctional family travelling the breadth of the country trying to escape the terror that is falling from the skies. These metallic creations are ruthless, destroying everything in their path but somehow the emphasis of this is more on why "Ray" can't get on with "Robbie" (Justin Chatwin) and whether or not "Rachel" (Dakota Fanning) can keep hold of her childhood toy. The effects are good: the lasers and the pyrotechnics; the explosions and scenes of dereliction are impressive - but oddly enough, I found them less so than in the iteration made fifty years earlier. Lots of horrified expressions as the cast look longingly at green screens, some banal dialogue and we end up with a film about the people in/behind it rather than one about alien world domination. After almost two hours, the ending - and it's huge significance - is almost an afterthought to the boring story of who did what to whom over the years in the "Ferrier" family. Cruise can, at times, bring charisma to the screen. Here he brings little and I am afraid that I found this a triumph of commercialism over creativity and was cheerily egging on the aliens from fairly early on.

Rob

Rob

8 /10

An intense, serious and harrowing portrayal of the H.G. Wells classic. Tom Cruise doing an excellent job of not being Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning out acting everyone. It's hard to call this film an enjoyable watch as it's actually emotionally affecting at times, with some very raw realism concerning human nature. This movie manages to keep a constantly high pace without being exhausting to watch. Well worth a place in your collection.

Reviews provided by TMDB