The Darkest Hour backdrop
The Darkest Hour poster

THE DARKEST HOUR

2011 US HMDB
December 22, 2011

In Moscow, five young people lead the charge against an alien race which has attacked Earth via our power supply.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Tom Jacobson (Producer)Timur Bekmambetov (Producer)Arnon Milchan (Executive Producer)Hutch Parker (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Leslie Bohem (Story)Jon Spaihts (Screenplay)M.T. Ahern (Story)
Music: Tyler Bates (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Scott Kevan (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Sean and Ben have just arrived in Moscow to conclude a deal, but upon arriving at the location, they realize that their idea has been stolen by a rising Swedish yes man, Skyler. Disappointed by the failure, the two boys seek comfort in a trendy venue where they meet Natalie and Annie, two American girls. That same evening, strange balls of light fall from the sky, a prelude to a terrible alien invasion featuring invisible extraterrestrials that feed on electrical energy, pulverizing any living being they come into contact with. Sean, Ben, Natalie, Anne, and Skyler find themselves united in an attempt to survive the alien attack while humanity around them seems defeated. Do you remember the iconic American science fiction films that told stories of alien invasions, making explicit or implicit references to Russian enemies? They called it Red Scare, stemming from the historic Cold War that, in the aftermath of World War II, pitted the United States against the Soviet Union, foreshadowing terrible nuclear disasters. Body Snatchers, Martians... they could be called by different names but represented (sometimes unintentionally) the metaphor of the Soviet invader, the sly "foreigner" ready to conquer other lands to expand his dominion. Today, nearly 23 years after the fall of the Soviet bloc, the relationship between the United States and Russia has been completely redefined, the enemies of America are to be sought in the Middle East, and although some tension can be detected from time to time, the two superpowers no longer show too obvious signs of hostility. Timur Bekmambetov, a Russian filmmaker who became famous in his homeland and abroad for the blockbusters "Night Watch" and "Day Watch," then adopted by Hollywood for "Wanted," the action movie with Jolie, and now working on "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter," testifies to this. But Bekmambetov is also a producer, and to demonstrate this not just symbolic union between the United States and Russia, he puts Moscow capital at the service of a co-production that, in the end, has the appearance of a fully American film. Like Luc Besson before him, Bekmambetov has a clear idea of cinema that evokes American star-studded entertainment, and "The Darkest Hour," despite having more Russian names in the credits than American ones, is structured like a U.S. B-movie of the kind produced mostly in the '80s. The alien invasion is not so much a device to unite international terrestrial forces against a common enemy from somewhere, but above all the classic trigger to show a group of people trapped in a hostile place (in this case, the dispersed Moscow) dealing with extreme survival. The screenwriter John Spaihts stages a situation that is as classic as it gets, with continuous clichés of the fantasy/catastrophe genre and characters not so much stereotyped as cut with an axe. During the viewing of "The Darkest Hour," you have fun, but at the end of the film, you breathe a strange air of disappointment generated by continuous sensations of déjà-vu and narrative approximation. But let's go into detail. When the characters enter the scene, it is clear who will make it to the end of the film and who will fall victim (heroically, unluckily, or stupidly) to the aliens; they make you feel it in every way: physical appearance, behavior, actor's popularity... in short, zero surprises. Often and willingly, the characters do and say improbable things, such as the foolish conviction that reaching the American embassy can save the protagonists when around them there are only ruins, or taking the most uncomfortable and clearly riskiest escape route when they could act differently, or even giving up a lifeline for unclear ideals. It is evident that John Spaihts inserted some good ideas into the script, but equally "unintelligent" choices do not help the film. Among the good ideas is certainly that of portraying invisible aliens, which on the one hand helps the creators not to strain their brains too much in the creation of creatures that most of the time disappoint and on the other hand favors the creation of tension, since what we cannot see appears decidedly more dangerous and fearsome. The first point unfortunately is not maintained to the end, and in the end, they felt the need to let us glimpse the appearance of the aliens, which, as expected, is disappointing, almost cartoonish. The second point, on the other hand, gives the director Chris Gorak the opportunity to create some excellent scenes in which the presence of the aliens is revealed only by the reaction of the electrical devices. For Gorak, who we remember made his debut with the beautiful dramatic thriller "Right at Your Door," "The Darkest Hour" is the classic easy pass for works that count, productively speaking, but a certain stylistic anonymity of a film on commission is noticeable. The cast also turns out to be rather anonymous. On the one hand, there is the Emile Hirsch of "Into the Wild" and "Speed Racer," who alternates moments out of part (when he plays the hero/guérrilla) with others that suit him better (the good-natured one at the beginning of the film) and the unusual and interesting face of Olivia Thirlby ("Juno"; "Friends with Kids..."), on the other hand, there is a cast that is hard to remember, starting with the unlikely Russian punks to end with the intrusive Rachael Taylor ("Transformers"; "Shroud from the Past"). Do not forget that "The Darkest Hour" was shot in 3D and makes discreet use of stereoscopy. The focus is very much on depth of field and sometimes the effect of "objects hurled toward the screen" is played with; it is not a 3D necessary for the purposes of the story, but it is yet another demonstration that if a film is shot in native 3D, the technical result is of good level. In the end, "The Darkest Hour" is a fantasy/horror B-movie that certainly does not leave a mark: too many flaws, many naiveties. Certainly, you do not get bored, and for an hour and a half of pure entertainment, this show can also work... but if you want a more "substantial" film, you necessarily have to look elsewhere.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus Disney Plus
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

Reno

Reno

4 /10

When the electric mist from the sky struck down.

This film came five years ago, but I watched it now. A US-Russian collaboration product that's entirely takes place in Moscow. This is an alien invasion theme, but slightly different than those similar films. It never gives the reason, just the destructions like apocalypse on its way. That means it is about the survival. A group of Americans who are in the Moscow for different reasons joins the hands after people started to turn into ashes with the contact of the strange electric mist that came from the sky. So what's their plan now and whether they get out of it safely or not focused on the remaining film.

Surely some people would enjoy it. It's not all bad if you are not expecting a masterpiece. I should have seen it in digital 3D for a better experience, even the normal watch is not that bad. The turns in the story were unpredictable, particularly the film characters, but the twist wasn't. They kept the open ending, and you know why is that. I liked the performances, not individually, but the overall everyone, including the Russians.

The film was also shorter, which means fast moving tale. The graphics were okay, especially those electric mist thing, but disappointed for not show the aliens other than for fractions of seconds during the fightbacks. Despite enjoyed watching it, I'm not in favour of it, because it's just one of those films that falls in the average category where the majority of those who watched it not happy for not detailing everything in the film.

4/10

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

3 /10

Good CGI, good action scenes, good sound, Moscow is an interesting place, but everything else is so weak and stupid that it's not worth watching this movie twice.

I decided to watch this film yesterday, when it was shown on TV, but curiously I was waiting to see another film with a similar title made in 2017. Even so, I didn't give up my time: even though I didn't have much predilection for alien invasion films, the film is quite dynamic, has good action scenes and a good amount of high quality CGI, and so it is, at least, a piece of entertainment that we don't regret watching... once. Just once.

Let's start with the good stuff: the scenes take place in Moscow, the Russian megalopolis, long before we ostracized the country due to aggression against neighboring Ukraine, when Russians seemed to want to have more contact with Westerners. This was a real breath of fresh air because in sci-fi films we almost only see US cities. I also believe that filming in Russia was a strategic option for the production to be able to film at lower costs. In addition to the clever use of the filming locations (which include Red Square and the GUM Shopping Center), the film offers us a massive dose of high-quality CGI, which we see in greater glory when the aliens appear. But the whole film is a feast of CGI and visual effects. The sound effects are also very good, and the action and running scenes are fun enough to keep the film moving.

And unfortunately, good things end here. Everything else is so full of flaws and problems that make the film unworthy of a second chance. This is just my opinion, but I think we can all agree on one point: there are a lot of films about alien invasions, and it doesn't take much thinking to remember two or three that make this film a total joke.

The film is directed by Chris Gorak, but it seems like he was more fascinated with CGI and action than trying to direct. Thus, we have a very young cast who are left to their own devices and who interpret the characters according to what seems most appropriate to them. Emile Hirsch did an excellent work in “Into the Wild” just before this, but he had a solid character and was well directed. Here, he has none: the result is a tepid, vague, lifeless interpretation without any personality. His partner Max Minghella, who had just done “The Social Network”, was not a good choice for his character. He is one of those actors who is “always the bridesmaid and never the bride”, so to speak: his lack of presence and charisma put him far from the main roles, although he is an option for supporting cast. Joel Kinnaman is stupidly weak as the villain: he behaves like a high school bully, and his character is as thin as paper. Olivia Thirlby also does little for the film, with a character who merely looks sexy, and who we expect to see kissing one of the boys at some point. Worse luck was Rachael Taylor, who is irritating to the point that we say hallelujah when her character finally dies. And the Russian cast? I don't know any of the actors, but I even liked Veronika Vernadskaya a little. Unfortunately, the Russian cast seems to be there only for us to see the Russians as perpetual badasses, a "Rambo nation" on horseback with machine guns. Putin certainly enjoyed seeing this in a Western film.

As bad as the cast and their performance, the script copies moments and elements from several sci-fi films (“Cloverfield”, for example) to create a story where there is no logical sense or real threat. It's truly unfortunate that, with such good CGI and such well-chosen filming locations, the film is unable to cause a single shiver of tension in the audience. In addition to a rather weak story, there are several moments in which the film seems to be mocking our intelligence: Moscow is one of the most densely populated places in the world: it makes sense that, even after the city is devastated in the first attack, there are only five or six people wandering the streets? Seeing a commercial plane crashed in a shopping center is sensational, but where did its wings end up? And why is there no fire, debris or explosions resulting from the collision? The film ends with a nuclear submarine setting sail from the Moscow River. However, you don't need to be a Muscovite or even a Russian to see that this watercourse doesn't have the depth or width to maneuver such a big thing! To think that the public will believe this things is insulting.

Reviews provided by TMDB