The Convent backdrop
The Convent poster

THE CONVENT

2000 US HMDB
January 21, 2000

A group of college students break into an abandoned convent and become possessed by demonic spirits.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Roland Carroll (Executive Producer)Ryan Carroll (Executive Producer)Elliot Metz (Executive Producer)Jed Nolan (Producer)Rene Torres (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Chaton Anderson (Screenplay)
Music: Joey Bishara (Original Music Composer)Joseph Bishara (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Jason Lowe (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
In 1960, a girl armed with a pump-action shotgun and equipped with a baseball bat and gasoline cans bursts into a convent and, after beating and injuring the priest and the nuns, sets the entire building on fire. 40 years later. The convent has now become a place of legends, and it often happens that the students from the adjacent university campus choose it as a place to perform daredevil stunts for freshmen. One night, seven young people decide to go to the convent to spend some hours of fun and to help one of them pass the daredevil stunt; however, in the same place, on the same night, four satanists, determined to summon the prince of darkness, perform a human sacrifice, thus unleashing the forces of evil. One by one, the reckless visitors of the convent will be possessed by evil, turning into bloodthirsty monsters. It's a strange feeling to watch "The Convent" knowing that the film was produced in 2000; it's a strange feeling because coming across this type of film in 2000 is a bit like finding a four-leaf clover in a thicket of hawthorns. Clearly old-style and with irreverent and semi-demented tones, "The Convent" explicitly refers to the splatter genre of the 1980s, re-proposing situations already seen (and loved) in now cult films like "The House," "Demons," and the lesser "Night of the Demons" and "The Knight of Evil." From the very beginning, the entire film is pervaded by an air of complacent amusement that, from the introduction set in the 1960s, already foreshadows a missed cult, a hypothesis then confirmed as the film progresses: every situation proposed inevitably reminds one of a situation already seen elsewhere, halfway between the declared homage and the need to draw from the past due to an obvious lack of ideas. The characters are all quite stupid and excessively two-dimensional, halfway between the stereotype and the parody of the same; unfortunately, even the key character of the film (the girl of the convent massacre, now grown up) is only roughly sketched, although, to the joy of fans, the role is played by a rejuvenated Adrienne Barbeau, unforgettable co-star of so much 1980s horror cinema like "The Fog" and "Creepshow." At this point, it's not clear whether to applaud Mike Mendez's work or to frown after watching it. The praiseworthy feat of highlighting the nostalgic aspect of the film is to be considered successful, thanks to a simple and at times effective story, the participation of an icon of the good cinema that was, and a massive dose of splatter scenes, which do not lack exploding heads, flayed faces, and a triumph of various liquids (with a possessed child who vomits pea puree!). Then a special applause goes to the makeup effects, capable of creating credible and frightening demons, original in the choice of ecclesiastical look. However, if the film is analyzed from an optic that goes beyond the simple excitement for the nostalgic aspect, then one encounters a series of evident limits, not so much technical (even if it is a low-budget film, the quality does not suffer too much, indeed, in addition to the already mentioned special effects, the particularly peculiar photography is to be admired, which prefers pop color tones that are often fluorescent), but above all content-related: a very thin story, unbelievable and excessively superficial characters, and an inexplicable haste in the creation of the final product. The film is on the border between the medium and the feature film (it barely reaches 70 minutes) and almost completely lacks an adequate final climax, resolving itself in a hasty manner, as if more than one scene had been omitted from the editing, an inexplicable choice, given the ridiculous duration of the film. Therefore, a fair evaluation of "The Convent" probably lies in the middle: a film especially for longtime enthusiasts that entertains and makes you smile, but also a very light film, not always well-made and in several points too hasty. If the work had been conducted with greater skill, we would have found ourselves in front of a new cult, instead we have an innocuous product for a summer late-night show. It definitely deserves half a pumpkin more.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

Gimly

Gimly

5 /10

The Convent's inclusion of a single character seen only at the beginning and end of the film is basically all that separates it from being a shot-for-shot remake of Night of the Demons. Which I gues doesn't sound so bad in theory, I mean, I like that movie, so ripping it off isn't the worst idea. But if you're gonna steal the entire concept, maybe don't steal some of the other stuff. Like I think it would've even been easier to swallow if it was just something as straight forward as making the "demons" look different from how they do in Night of the Demons, you know, just for that little bit of originality. But I guess that's too much to ask. I honestly did still kind of enjoy this though.

Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole.

Wuchak

Wuchak

5 /10

Tries too hard

Several college students in SoCal break into a condemned convent for kicks, but its infamous past turns out to be worse than they understood. Havoc ensues.

"The Convent" (2000) is an over-the-top horror/comedy that’s creative, energetic and edgy, but it’s too wannabe ‘hip’ and overcompensates. It’s no where near as bad as “Killer Tongue” (1996) in this regard, but it’s cut from the same cloth. Though only costing $1 million, the special effects are quite good and hold up. Some people don’t like the fast-motion effects for the creatures, but they worked for me.

I get that this is a stylishly cheesy horror flick with a black sense of humor (and a plot ripped-off from “Night of the Demons”), but the story has to hold up for viewers to accept what’s going on to some reasonable degree. Unfortunately, there’s the glaring plot hole of the school staff suddenly showing up one day looking like veritable monsters and the students just go along with it. Hands get beaten to a bloody mess with a yard stick, the ‘nuns’ write "hail Satan" on the board and spew green vomit on students, but none of them informs their parents or the police of what’s going on or, at least, get the Gehenna outta there? Why Sure!

Winsome Joanna Canton is good as protagonist Clorissa and Megahn Perry is effective as the cool Goth girl with a droll sense of humor while Chaton (Itae) Anderson is worth a mention as Sapphira, one of the ‘devil’s disciples.’ Adrienne Barbeau shows up in the last act for a hammy performance. She was 54 during shooting and her body was still in perfect shape.

At the end of the day, this is entertaining to a point with its acknowledged highlights (and more, like Coolio’s amusing cop), but the ‘hip’ frat boys are too annoying and the overall vibe is that of trying too hard to be a cult flick. It was shot in 1999 and I couldn’t help think that this was the tipping point for the decline of America and Western Civilization.

The movie runs 1 hour, 19 minutes, and was shot in Los Angeles.

GRADE: C

Reviews provided by TMDB