The Exorcism of Emily Rose backdrop
The Exorcism of Emily Rose poster

THE EXORCISM OF EMILY ROSE

2005 US HMDB
settembre 9, 2005

A metà tra il legal-thriller e l'horror metafisico, il film di Derrickson ci mostra il processo dello Stato contro padre Moore, accusato di aver indotto Emily Rose alla morte: il prete l'avrebbe spinta ad abbandonare la cura medica prescrittale a rimedio di una supposta patologia psicotico-epilettica, per sottoporla ad un tentativo di esorcismo: perché di possessione del Diavolo (anzi, di sei demoni) avrebbe sofferto in realtà Emily. Tra continui flashback e le udienze in aula, scopriamo una realtà difficile da credere, ma impossibile da negare del tutto.

Cast

👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Commenti

Commenti (0)

Troupe

Produzione: David McIlvain (Executive Producer)Julie Yorn (Executive Producer)Beau Flynn (Producer)Paul Harris Boardman (Producer)Andre Lamal (Executive Producer)Tom Rosenberg (Producer)Gary Lucchesi (Producer)Tripp Vinson (Producer)Terry McKay (Executive Producer)
Sceneggiatura: Scott Derrickson (Screenplay)
Musica: Christopher Young (Original Music Composer)
Fotografia: Tom Stern (Director of Photography)

RECENSIONI (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
L′avvocatessa carrierista e agnostica Erin Bruner accetta di rappresentare la difesa del sacerdote cattolico padre Moore, accusato dell′ omicidio della giovane Emily Rose, morta durante un rituale di esorcismo. L′accusa sostiene che la ragazza soffriva di epilessia psicotica e l′intervento dell′esorcista, che ha intralciato le cure mediche di Emily, è stato fatale per la paziente. L′Arcidiocesi vorrebbe far tacere padre Moore, per non far scoppiare uno scandalo, ma il sacerdote vuole raccontare tutta la verità ed illustrare per filo e per segno ogni passaggio della possessione di Emily Rose. Presentato fuori concorso all′ultimo festival di Venezia e grande successo al suo esordio al botteghino in Usa, "The exorcism of Emily Rose" è un curioso mix tra il dramma giudiziario e l′horror demoniaco. Il film è ispirato a un vero fatto di cronaca ( la frase "Tratto da una storia vera" è sempre più frequente nelle locandine dei film horror degli ultimi tempi ) che ha visto nel 1976 la morte di Anneliese Michel, una ragazza tedesca poco più che ventenne, deceduta durante una pratica di esorcismo; il sacerdote che praticò il rito fu accusato di omicidio colposo a causa di negligenza nei confronti della paziente, ritenuta soggetta ad epilessia e a problemi di natura schizofrenica. Questa trasposizione cinematografica, si dipana quindi su due registri ben differenti: da una parte abbiamo la stesura da legal thriller, che occupa il buon 70% del film; dall′altra un restante 30% affidato ai flashback che raccontano la drammatica vicenda della presunta indemoniata, illustrata tramite generose e shockanti scene horror. I due livelli filmici sembrerebbero quasi inconciliabili tra loro, ma vedendoli mixati in questa pellicola si può ammettere che Scott Derrickson ( regista e sceneggiatore del film ) è riuscito nell′impresa: le parti ambientate nell′aula di tribunale sono incalzanti e riescono a destare l′interesse dello spettatore; le parti che riguardano la possessione e l′esorcismo riesco addirittura ad essere agghiaccianti. Infatti uno dei meriti maggiori del film ( almeno per il pubblico che ama il genere horror ) è l′impressionante realismo con cui è stata affrontata e mostrata la vicenda della possessione; quindi niente vomito verde, niente rotazione del capo, niente levitazione, ma solamente urla abominevoli, contrazioni nervose al limite dell′umano, pupille dilatate e ferite autoinflitte. Realismo, dunque, che concede il minimo spazio all′effettistica ( ci sono solo le allucinazioni di Emily che strizzano l′occhio ai più banali effettacci da horror di serie B ) e che tutto punta sull′ambiguità della vicenda: Emily Rose era davvero posseduta dal demonio ( o meglio, da 6 demoni! ), oppure la sua era un′autentica epilessia degenerata in seguito a credenze superstiziose alimentate dall′ambiente bigotto in cui la ragazza è cresciuta? Il film non vuole dare una risposta a tutto ciò e giustamente non potrebbe, ma è questo, probabilmente, l′aspetto più attuale e scottante della pellicola: l′eterno conflitto tra fede e scienza. La pellicola instaura un approccio molto più laico in confronto agli innumerevoli horror demoniaci che l′hanno preceduta, anche se si concede qualche flessione nei cliché più abusati del filone; avremo quindi crocifissi che si capovolgono durante l′esorcismo; la ragazza posseduta che viene legata al letto e parla lingue sconosciute, animali che agiscono da tramiti per il demonio, ecc.; caratteristiche forse inserite per accontentare anche il pubblico più affezionato al cinema horror. Gli interpreti sono di ottimo livello: si va dalla bravissima Laura Linney, nel ruolo dell′avvocatessa protagonista, scettica che accetta il caso solo per un salto di carriera, ma che si trova a rivedere il proprio rapporto con la fede; a Tom Wilkinson, nella parte di padre Moore, un uomo tormentato ma forte; fino alla impressionante e convincente interpretazione di Jennifer Carpenter nel ruolo di Emily Rose. In conclusione "The exorcism of Emily Rose" è un horror anomalo e originale, ben lontano dalla frivolezza di molte recenti pellicole splatter ( pur sempre graditissime! ), che si avvale di una regia sicura, di un cast di prima qualità e di efficacissime scene di possessione da far accapponare la pelle. Si può considerare un′operazione riuscita.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Commenti

Commenti (0)

Dove Guardare

Streaming

Netflix Netflix

Noleggio

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Acquista

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

RECENSIONI DALLA COMMUNITY (2)

slayrrr666

4 /10

During the trial for his events, a lawyer tries to help her client, a priest, seek the truth about what happened to the young woman who died under his care while performing an exorcism to cure her of a demonic possession and eventually lets the truth about it be known.

This wasn't anywhere as bad as it could've been. The film is really split into two halves here with this one being basically helped greatly by its really good possession and shock scenes. The opening scene that sets her up to becoming possessed is one of it's best sequences, as the long hallway and the unearthly voices floating around give it an unearthly feel while the first scene in the classroom where she sees a demonic face appearing in the window through a cloud of mist and turns around to see a student's face turn into a distorted demon's face giving off an unearthly roar makes it quite shocking. Running out into the rain and seeing more demonic faces give off the same unearthly roar is a bit clichéd, but it still helps to sell the mood while the finale in the church giving this a quite creepy conclusion. The different manners of how she’s become afflicted are quite memorable moments with the frenzied bug-eating, speaking in tongues or just contorting her body into such impossible positions that it really becomes obvious something is wrong with her, and the long, suspenseful and chilling exorcism is the film's selling point, coming off with any number of creepy ideas and scenes in such a drawn-out style is one of the best scenes in the film. Otherwise, beyond the shocks and the exorcism, there isn't much else to like about it. Therefore, everything else in it doesn't really work which is only relegated to the courtroom battle drama. It's marketed as being a supernatural possession film, and the best moments come from those scenes, but the fact that the majority of the film is a courtroom battle with the supernatural elements coming in the form of flashbacks is a real misstep and is likely to confuse those coming in expecting the other kind of film. It's not that they're boring or anything, it's just that it's out of nowhere that it becomes that way, and it can be a disappointment. The fact that these are slow and really long don't help matters, extending this out far longer than it should. This could've easily been an hour and a half, or maybe a little longer, but the two hours running time forces it to keep the courtroom antics going for no reason other than to extend the running time. A few extraneous scenes could've been snipped as well, including the introductory scenes at the bar that repeat information we already know and also keep the running time going, and most of the time simply elicit a feeling of wanting to move along and get to the good scenes. These really harm the film.

Rated PG-13: Language, Mild Violence and intense demonic and spiritual themes.

Wuchak

Wuchak

9 /10

Scares the hell out of ya

This was based on the actual story of a German girl who died while being exorcised in the late 1970s. The priest was then put on trial for neglectful homicide. Google it for details.

Erin Bruner (Laura Linney) plays an agnostic who defends the priest (Tom Wilkinson) while the prosecutor (Campbell Scott) is a believer. This creates some problems: How can an unbeliever defend a believer who performs a service that apparently kills the young woman? How can a believer come against another believer who was simply trying to deliver the girl from spiritual malevolence?

The prosecutor makes the case that the woman was ill with various mental disorders and that the exorcism was just a bunch of superstitious mumbo jumbo. By contrast, Erin Bruner argues that these illnesses were the RESULT OF possession -- that the girl's possession brought on the symptoms. This makes sense in light of the scriptural evidence of Jesus Christ delivering people from evil spirits who induced insanity, muteness and deafness.

Another important argument of the defense is that a potent drug that Emily was prescribed trapped her in a mode that was resistant to the exorcism.

The fascinating story provokes many questions. We need to take an honest look at our mental health practices and institutions. Although there are some genuinely good people working in this field who care about the patients, it seems that the best we can do is drug people and make them, more or less, numbed-up living zombies or even mindless vegetables. Unfortunately this is how they're damned to live the rest of their lives, subservient and dependent on the mental health establishment (that actually needs them to stay ill in order to exist).

Such people don't need more drugs and "therapy." What they need is delivered. They need delivered from evil spiritual powers that have possessed them. They need FREED. Don't mistake me here, I'm not against mental health people or facilities because I realize they're just doing what they know to do. It's just not working. Again, the mentally ill need delivered not force-fed more drugs and essentially locked-up for the rest of their lives. That's not life, it's living death!

Of course, releasing a horde of religious wackos into our mental institutions isn't the answer. Yet, what if some believers who walked in the boldness and authority of Jesus Christ were available, people who show documented evidence of DELIVERING the mentally ill? The New Testament relays case after case of Jesus Christ exorcising demons from hundreds of people, maybe thousands. He didn't numb 'em up and sentence them to a life of living death. Rather he came to set the prisoners free from darkness, heal the sick and heal the brokenhearted! If there are people out there who walk in this same anointing of power and freedom, shouldn't we allow them to minister to our mentally ill?

Unfortunately a large percentage of the church is very weak in regards to spiritual deliverance. Except for offering eternal salvation, which is wonderful, their gospel is powerless and next to worthless. Yet this wasn't the way of the early Church. Paul, Peter and others offered total deliverance. Thankfully, there are still a remnant of these types of believers and these are the ones who can help our mentally ill, as long as the oppressed WANT freedom, healing and deliverance (since some WANT to stay dependent and "cared for").

I'm only raising such moral/theological/philosophical questions because the film provokes it. So please don't be irked at me for getting all heavy and theological.

Despite the numerous courtroom scenes (which I'm not a fan of) there are certainly enough horrifying elements in "The Exorcism of Emily Rose" to please most horror fans, just don't expect Freddy or Jason shenanigans.

Interestingly, while it's horrifying "The Exorcism of Emily Rose" is also somehow warm and faith-affirming, even sometimes beautiful.

My only criticism is a theological theory introduced late in the movie. This theory is incredible wrong. I won't elaborate except to say that God would never allow the option of Emily's possession as a supposed testimony to the world of the existence of dark spiritual powers, rather the God's purpose is always to deliver such people, which not only testifies to the existence of the malevolent powers but, more importantly, sets the person FREE and gives glory to the Almighty.

The film runs 119 (the unrated version 122 minutes) and was shot in Vancouver, BC.

GRADE: A

Recensioni fornite da TMDB