V/H/S backdrop
V/H/S poster

V/H/S

2012 US HMDB
July 28, 2012

When a group of misfits is hired by an unknown third party to burglarize a desolate house and acquire one rare VHS tape, they discover more found footage than they had bargained for.

Cast

👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Roxanne Benjamin (Producer)Gary Binkow (Producer)Brad Miska (Producer)
Screenplay: Ti West (Writer)David Bruckner (Writer)Matt Bettinelli-Olpin (Writer)Nicholas Tecosky (Writer)Simon Barrett (Writer)Chad Villella (Writer)Glenn McQuaid (Writer)
Cinematography: Adam Wingard (Director of Photography)Michael J. Wilson (Director of Photography)Victoria K. Warren (Director of Photography)Andrew Droz Palermo (Director of Photography)Eric Branco (Director of Photography)Justin Martinez (Director of Photography)Tyler Gillett (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
A group of thugs sneak into a house with the task of retrieving a VHS tape, for which they will receive money. To their surprise, however, they will find a real collection of VHS tapes in the house, so they will start watching the tapes to find the one they need. The tapes contain amateur films showing terrible events: three friends looking for sex pick up a strange creature, a couple on vacation is threatened by a girl who sneaks into their motel room at night, four friends go to spend an afternoon at the lake and are pursued by an invisible killer, a girl documents the presences haunting her house to her boyfriend via Skype, four friends go looking for fun on Halloween night but encounter a sect dedicated to human sacrifices. There are two particularly popular trends in today's independent (or super low budget) horror cinema: episode films and mockumentaries. The former, when they are collective works, allow minimizing overall costs by dividing the production of each episode, which is usually managed by different people; the latter use the "fake amateur" language to reduce technical costs and make a couple of digital video cameras and perhaps an iPhone sufficient to make the film. Well, take these two trends and combine them in a film that is a mockumentary in its found footage exception and at the same time an episode film. Strongly wanted by Brad Miska, i.e., the responsible for the well-known web portal dedicated to horror information Bloody Disgusting, who put the money in co-production and conceived the basic concept, "V/H/S" presents itself as a sum and at the same time an affirmation of the current American horror underground scene and to do so celebrates a format - the VHS - which, in addition to justifying the technical quality of the short films in most cases, is also a somewhat nostalgic declaration of love for a passion for cinema born in the 1980s and 1990s. Many of you who are now around 30 years old probably lost your cinematic virginity with the dear old VHS tapes, now replaced years ago by digital media... but it was with the analog that they met the first monsters and cheered for the first boogeymen, something that surely happened to Miska's team, thus being paid homage in this film. In fact, the concept is brilliant and the five-episode structure, held together by a frame, works very well this way, better than other similar films. Moreover, the use of the found footage technique gives the overall work an extra edge, making it appear original and up-to-date, as well as clever in turning necessity into virtue. It must be said, however, that at least on one occasion, specifically in the video chat episode, the transfer to VHS is not justified, partly showing the flaw of a project that could thus give reason to those who considered it anachronistic. But let's get to the episodes specifically. The segment that serves as the frame is directed by Adam Wingard, director of "You're Next" and "A Horrible Way to Die," and is titled "Tape 56." Nothing exceptional, to be honest, and if we exclude the narrative utility that serves to tie all the other segments together, it would be hard to recognize any merit in the film. Excellent, however, is the one that is the first real episode, "Amateur Night" by David Bruckner, one of the directors of the apocalyptic "The Signal." In this case, the framing is constantly in subjective thanks to the small video camera placed on the glasses of one of the protagonists, three young men looking for strong pleasures and intending to film an amateur porn without the partners knowing. Excellent management of spaces and times, as well as the combination of sex and horror that occurs in the character of the girl/victim played by a brilliant Hannah Fierman, who transforms into a bloodthirsty executioner, a monstrous and winged creature that unleashes itself in the motel room where she would have unwittingly become the star of the porn show. All in all, "Amateur Night" is the best of the five. Next is "Second Honeymoon" by the indie-horror king Ti West, director of "The Roost," "The House of the Devil," and "Cabin Fever 2." The episode, which is nothing more than the vacation film of a couple in the midst of a crisis, has some good moments of unease in the nighttime incursions of the stalker into the protagonists' room, but it drags on slowly and boringly for most of the time (it's a real vacation film!) and the ending does not satisfy too much, transforming everything into a "Bounce"-like thriller. The third episode, "Tuesday the 17th," is simply the worst, a thing that would pay homage in mockumentary key to "Friday the 13th" (the title is explanatory, in this regard) but it only turns out to be awkward, confused and poorly made from all points of view. The four boys slaughtered by the "intermittent" killer are not convincing and even the Irish director Glenn McQuaid, already the author of the horror comedy "I Sell the Dead," does not seem at all inspired. Better with the next episode, "The Sick Thing that Happened to Emily when She was Young" by Joe Swanberg, a ghost story that manages to be unsettling in a couple of scenes and boasts an unexpected ending. Swanberg, who also acts as the protagonist in Ti West's segment, focuses on technology and is the only one of the 5 episodes to use the internet. In addition to creating the "problem" of the support mentioned above, this episode is incredibly similar to the contemporary "Paranormal Activity 4," bringing with it a very strong sense of déjà-vu, starting with the figures of the ghost children who remind many films and even scary videos circulating on the internet. It convinces halfway. Much better, however, is the last episode, "10/31/98," made by the collective The Silence. We start from well-known premises, such as the Halloween holiday and a group of boys who want to party, but when we get to the horror part, with a satanic sect and a house haunted by the devil with arms coming out of the wall and objects levitating, the show is guaranteed. The frenetic rhythm of the second part is a successful choice, some situations scare and only the ending with a taste of urban legend seems a bit out of place. Overall, it is one of the best episodes. With ups and downs, as happens with every film composed of multiple episodes, "V/H/S" can be considered an overall successful project. Curious and original in its concept, it perhaps has the flaw of being too long (we approach 2 hours), with the fatigue effect - surely also given by the shaky shots - that at the end of the viewing grips the spectator. Anyway, worth watching.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

MIDNIGHT FACTORY Amazon Channel MIDNIGHT FACTORY Amazon Channel

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (3)

LastCaress1972

V/H/S, 9/10. Gory, fun and inventive - if flawed - portmanteau horror pic shot in the cinéma vérité (Cloverfield, [REC], The Blair Witch Project) style.

Like all anthology pieces, some ideas work better than others but V/H/S is packed with good stuff, containing as it does six "stories" (including the wraparound segment that tenuously links them all), each directed by a different up-and-coming bright young thing in horror movies. The wraparound story is by far the worst, and bizarrely it wraps up second-to-last, but still: a bunch of petty-criminal ****ers, presently making small-but-quick bucks from a streaming porn site by attacking innocent women in the street and exposing their breasts for the camera (charming) are hired by a "fan" of the site to carry out a reasonably simple task: break into a house, sneak in, steal a specific VHS videotape (apparently they'll know it when they see it, though this is far from the case), and get out of there. What they find is a largely empty house save for a cellar area chock-full of tapes and one room containing an expired tenant sat in front of a bank of old TVs and video players. They randomly play through a few of the many tapes in order to try and ascertain what they're supposed to be nicking, and that's where the five anthology tales come in; they're what these bellends see on the videotapes.

The stories, then (I'll buzz through these, they're only twenty minutes or so long each, so too much info will be to give the story up):

  1. Amateur Night - A trio of lads go out on the razzle armed with some cool camera-glasses, so one of the guys can happily film their evening's debauchery without anyone being any the wiser; superb if you're planning to get a couple of lasses back to your motel room for some gangbang action and film the results. They... well, they probably pick the wrong gal to bring back. I liked this one, despite my nagging fear (placed by this segment in tandem with the wraparound skit and even borne out further - though to a lesser degree - by the other segments) that there might be a nasty undercurrent of misogyny running through the movie. I guess though the simple truth is that when you put a bunch of young male twats in charge of filming ****, they end up venturing up the "amateur porn" route sooner rather than later.

  2. Second Honeymoon - Directed by slow-burn specialist Ti West (The Innkeepers, the superb House of the Devil), and this one's typical of his canon. Nothing really happens beyond getting to know - and like - the nice couple doing the usual touristy thing around Arizona/Nevada. Then a girl knocks at their motel room door. Gore-free - almost incident-free - until the very end, this one was nonetheless one of the most effective segments.

  3. Tuesday the 17th - In which four kids go into the woods. Where some murders happened once. Ahem. The segment initially most calling to mind The Blair Witch Project being as it is both found-footage style AND set in the woods, this was for me the least affecting of the "watched videotape" tales, not through a lack of ideas (well, let me clarify: it DOESN'T make a whole lot of sense, but I don't mind that at all in short-story form) but because the actors in this segment were the most "actorly", the least honest and realistic. IMO. That said, it moved along at a real lick, it's as gory as **** and the antagonist's "appearances" on the videotape are pretty cool.

  4. The Sick Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Younger - Chronicling a sequence of Skype chats (hang on: this tale is being watched on a musty old VHS tape; who's converting their Skype chats to VHS? Ah well, no matter I suppose) between a guy working away and his girl, who is becoming convinced that she's either going crazy, or the house is haunted. Her arm's hurting her, as well... Yeah, this was a pretty good one. Not much in the jump stakes but it had a nice Tales of the Unexpected vibe going on, which is always welcome in these sorts of films.

  5. 10/31/98 - Oh-so-simple tale, in which a bunch of guys - and in a refreshing change from the wraparound segment and Amateur Night, NOT a bunch of unlikeable dickheads - are on their way to a Halloween party, and go to the wrong house. Like, REALLY the wrong house. This may well be the best segment of the lot. Certainly the most cool-effects-laden. It was a great way to close out the movie.

Flaws - well, there's that aforementioned misogynistic streak running through the movie (most specifically the first 40 minutes or so). Also, although great ideas and buckets of grue abound and it was a blast to watch at the time, I'm afraid that lasting, visceral scares are thin on the ground, although I attribute that more to the nature of portmanteau films not having long enough per segment to develop real empathy or tension. But the worst flaw, by the proverbial "country mile", is that of all of the "shaky-cam" films I've ever seen, V/H/S is far and away the worst, most vomit-inducing exponent of that trait. Cloverfield didn't really pretend very well to be all that "amateur", [REC] elegantly addressed the problem by having their in-film cameraman be a professional television cameraman, with professional kit, and the Paranormal Activity franchise managed to sidestep the problem with the utility of tripods and fixed camera positions. So the worst I'd seen before this was probably The Blair Witch Project, way back when. But the cameras in V/H/S have been painstakingly made to look as amateur as possible, sadly to its detriment on several occasions. I found myself craning, squinting and frowning to see what the **** was happening a few times when I should have been freaking out at the events unfolding on-screen (somewhere).

Still, despite that: What V/H/S gets right, it gets VERY right (and it does so very often). If you likes your horrors, you need to give this one at least a look. Recommended.

John Chard

John Chard

7 /10

Creeper Compendium.

The horror anthology has a chequered history, some are bad but saved by one great segment, others boast a couple of genuine creepers but are undone by one instalment so bad it tarnishes the film forever. And on it goes. V/H/S brings the format into the new age by unfolding its tales by wrapping around the latest craze of found footage.

Six indie directors have produced a picture that was well received at Sundance but has proved to be most divisive with critics and horror fans on internet forums. This will come as no surprise to anyone who knows their horror anthology onions. The usual problems are evident here, a couple of great stories are surrounded by mediocre ones, but at least there is something for everyone, with most bases covered, but that in itself is a problem, all horror fans have preferences, it's a big ask to expect a fan of stalk and slash to love a story about a winged harpy!

Then there is the issue of the found footage format, here recorded on actual VHS. Not everyone is a fan (myself for instance), and much of V/H/S is dizzying and often hard to follow, especially as regards the Tape 56/frame narrative story that cloaks the other five stories as a bunch of no-mark young crims burgle a grotty house and sift through the tapes. It's a format loved by many for its supposed realism factors, I don't get that myself, but for those people this really is up their trees!

Amateur Night (David Bruckner) and The Sick Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Younger (Joe Swanberg) are the standouts. The former is a cautionary tale of frat boys out for sex who get more than they bargained for when they take home the mysterious Lily, the latter an eerie tale unfolded via Skype communication as Emily appears to be a victim of a haunting whilst chatting to her doctor boyfriend.

However, if you ask another fan of the film what stories they feel standout, you may just get two different answers. So as with any other anthology horror, you roll the dice and take your chance, just don't expect genius in every story, for that is purely folly of expectation. 7/10

Gimly

Gimly

5 /10

Anthologies are, by their very nature, pretty mixed. And found footage horror is not my kettle o' fish. So a found footage horror anthology did not have me ecstatic. I actually didn't mind V/H/S though, this was actually better than a loot of the found footage stuff I've seen, even if they do lean hard into the most annoying things about it, say for instance, video quality, which is (intentionally) abysmal. The framing device didn't work for me though, like, at all. I was very confused, and even if I hadn't been, I wasn't engaged by it at all. Which is a real shame, because I am particularly fond of the director of that part of the film, Adam Wingard. The entries over all weren't amazing, but, almost every segment of V/H/S had a real good "oh shit" sort of a moment in it that was real intense, and I'm into that.

Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole.

Reviews provided by TMDB