En el aeropuerto de Boston es un día como cualquier otro, caótico e invadido por una multitud de partida y llegada en el aeropuerto americano. Entre ellos está Clay Riddell, un dibujante de cómics cuya carrera está a punto de tomar un giro positivo gracias a la venta de los derechos de su novela gráfica para un videojuego.
CONEXIÓN MORTAL
Cell
Clayton Riddell es un famoso novelista que se encuentra en la cúspide de su carrera cómo escritor. Debe ir a Boston a presentar su última novela gráfica, aunque se encuentra melancólico debido a que su familia no ha podido acompañarle. A la vuelta de la presentación, comienzan a ocurrir cosas extrañas a su alrededor. Unas estruendas señales móviles están conviertiendo a los seres humanos en unos devoradores de sangre. Ante este estrepitoso accidente, Ridell deberá buscar la manera de llegar a su hogar y salvar a su familia antes de que esta plaga acabe con ellos.Adaptación de la novela de Stephen King "Cell"; en la elaboración del guión intervino el propio King.
Directores
Reparto
John Cusack
Clayton 'Clay' Riddell
Samuel L. Jackson
Thomas 'Tom' McCourt
Isabelle Fuhrman
Alice Maxwell
Owen Teague
Jordan
Clark Sarullo
Sharon Riddell
Anthony Reynolds
Ray
Erin Elizabeth Burns
Denise
Stacy Keach
Charles Ardai
Alex ter Avest
Chloe
Wilbur Fitzgerald
Geoff
Joshua Mikel
Raggedy Man
Catherine Dyer
Sally
Griffin Freeman
Mike Mattick
Ethan Andrew Casto
Johnny Riddell
Lloyd Kaufman
Bystander
Mark Ashworth
Bartender
E. Roger Mitchell
Roscoe
Gaby Leyner
Maddy
Rey Hernandez
Cop (Rick)
Frederick C. Johnson Jr.
Cop's Partner
Equipo
RESEÑAS (1)
TAMBIÉN PODRÍA GUSTARTE
Preguntas sobre Conexión Mortal
¿Cuánto dura Conexión Mortal?
Conexión Mortal dura 98 minutos.
¿Cuándo se estrenó Conexión Mortal?
Conexión Mortal se estrenó en 2016.
¿Quién dirigió Conexión Mortal?
Conexión Mortal está dirigida por Tod Williams.
¿Qué nota tiene Conexión Mortal?
La redacción de HorrorCult le da a Conexión Mortal 2,0 calaveras sobre 5, con una sola reseña.
Leer las reseñas
RESEÑAS DE LA COMUNIDAD
(6)
iamnotapixel
This is another example of a Stephen King novel that has not translated well into film. It's the usual 'bogey man' from nowhere who gets inside you head and dreams, sent to create mayhem and destruction against the human race, who are being turned into crazed killers by a mysterious signal from their mobile phones! One man (Cusack) in search of his son, thinks he can save humanity! The story line seems random and the ending has to be one of the worst I've ever seen.
Gimly
I've never read Cell, so I'm not sure if this is an accurate adaptation of a bad Stephen King book, or just another inaccurate adaptation of a Stephen King book. But either way, it's bad.
For a decent Cusack/Jackson team up in a King adaptation, just watch 1408.
Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid if possible.
John Chard
Brain Cell or Brain Drain?
Well I haven't read the book but I like Stephen King, I like John Cusack and I like Samuel Jackson, so Cell seemed like a good choice for a late night cerebral chiller. How far off was I? As it happens, very!
Suddenly cell phones are turning the populace into crazed homicidal maniacs, a small band of survivors try to stay alive and figure out what is going on...
It starts off promisingly, with whirls of chaotic violence and blood, but it then turns into a travelogue movie where everybody either looks bored or is clearly doing it for the money. There's some good ideas at work but the film never delivers on its promise, even serving up an ending that defies patience as well as logic. Being vague is a good thing if the pay off is worth the wait, unfortunately that isn't the case here. Epic fail and the actors and audience deserve better. 3/10
r96sk
Very poor, despite the presence of John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson.
<em>'Cell'</em> is basically <em>'<a href="https://letterboxd.com/film/land-of-the-dead/" rel="nofollow">Land of the Dead</a>'</em> without the proper zombies, at least that's what this 2016 flick kept reminding me of. That George A. Romero film is good, this Tod Williams release is not. It's a mess throughout and lacks any tension, freshness or uniqueness.
Cusack and Jackson should be a good pairing, yet I don't even recall anything from their respective performances just minutes after watching. Both are capable of a lot better than this, especially Jackson. No-one sticks out behind that duo, though it's neat to see <em>'<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_Break" rel="nofollow">Prison Break</a>'</em> actor Stacy Keach involved.
One to avoid, I'd say.
gigoran
After seeing the rotten tomatoes score I felt the need to come and rate this here. Is it the best movie in the world? No. Is it the worst? Heck no! For a movie straight to DVD and a low budget, it gets by well with 2 well known lead actors. The story itself is an original idea I have not seen before in a horror movie. It may be labeled as a horror, but there are no real scares. More of a thriller. I'm not a professional reviewer but I just wanted to add my 2 cents. It's not a 5 star movie. 3 and a half, or 4 at most. Go into it with an open mind. Your single viewing may surprise you
kendallgibson
Evil lurks everywhere... even in your phone! This movie should be used the next time America wants to torture a prisoner, because of how awful it is. Cusack exudes a primeval level of boredom, and Jackson overplays his hand as an A-lister (maybe he was practicing for when he literally has to phone it in... I don't know). If you're embarrassed to make a zombie movie, just say so! That way audiences don't have to sit through countless episodes of having to listen to needless exposition that your 'writer' forgot they already stated! At one point, I found myself desperately checking the settings of my TV because I thought it had broken -- the colors are that far off. To be kind, I will shout out the one scene I thought was clever:
Oh yeah, there wasn't one.
Reseñas proporcionadas por TMDB
Comentarios