Dracula Untold backdrop
Dracula Untold poster

DRACULA UNTOLD

2014 US HMDB
October 1, 2014

Vlad Tepes is a great hero, but when he learns the Sultan is preparing for battle and needs to form an army of 1,000 boys, he vows to find a way to protect his family. Vlad turns to dark forces in order to get the power to destroy his enemies and agrees to go from hero to monster as he's turned into the mythological vampire, Dracula.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Michael De Luca (Producer)Joseph M. Caracciolo Jr. (Executive Producer)Jon Jashni (Executive Producer)Alissa Phillips (Executive Producer)Thomas Tull (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Burk Sharpless (Writer)Matt Sazama (Writer)
Music: Ramin Djawadi (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: John Schwartzman (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Prince Vlad does everything he can to repel the Ottoman Empire's attempts to use Romania as a foothold to conquer the rest of Europe. After learning that the evil Sultan Mehmed II wants to take his son to annex him to the Turkish army, Vlad climbs a mountain where a dark demon resides in the hope of making a pact with him until he can defeat the Turkish hordes. The demon welcomes his request, but this happens at the cost of his transformation into a creature of the night. Once upon a time, Dracula was scary. This was the intention with which writer Bram Stoker created him in 1987, inspired by the ruthless figure of Vlad Tepes, and this is the reason why the most famous of all vampires has perhaps become the most representative creature of the multimedia horror pantheon. Tod Browning understood this well, who in 1931 entrusted the unsettling figure of Bela Lugosi with the task of bringing him to the cinema, as did Terence Fisher, who with "Dracula the Vampire" in 1958 perhaps created the best Dracula of all time thanks to the perfect casting of Christopher Lee in the role of the famous bloodsucker. We must not forget the excellent "Bram Stoker's Dracula" directed in 1992 by Francis Ford Coppola and starring a chameleonic Gary Oldman, who gave the noble vampire an unprecedented dignity of mainstream cinema... then the darkness. Indeed, if we exclude the not very successful but still appreciable for originality reinterpretation made by Patrick Lussier with "Dracula's Legacy – The Charm of Evil" in 2000, the other films in which the Vampire Prince has been the protagonist have certainly not left their mark. We have all (fortunately) forgotten the negligible vampire seen in the blockbuster "Van Helsing," which seemed like a less kitsch version of Renato Zero, not to mention the anonymous Thomas Kretschmann protagonist of Dario Argento's terrible "Dracula 3D" or the indefensible Jonathan Rhys Meyers who portrayed the vampire in the NBC TV series. In short, so many versions of the same character that most of the time have left much to be desired. "Dracula Untold," directed by debutant Gary Shore and starring Luke Evans, realistically, fits among the worst cinematic versions of a "certain weight" made about the character created by Bram Stoker. Let's start with the premise that this Dracula has really nothing to do with the Dracula created by the Irish writer, rather the screenwriters Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless developed the idea of telling an unprecedented Dracula that started from the most human side of the character. For this reason, "Dracula Untold," which in the working title was called "Dracula: Year Zero," is the story of the genesis of the character, a sort of prequel to the story we already know, which starts from the man and not from the monster. On paper, this intuition was excellent: to tell the historical aspect of Dracula, which Stoker himself drew from, and not the usual and trite story of the noble vampire who circles Harker, tries to seduce Mina, and is hunted by Van Helsing. Yet, despite the excellent premises, the team of "Dracula Untold" managed to do the worst possible. First of all, this film betrays everyone: the novel, History (with the "S" capitalized), and previous vampiric filmography, transforming Dracula into a superhero like those that today are very successful at the box office. "Dracula Untold," in fact, could have been titled "Superman Untold" resulting more honest with the paying public because a Vampire like this, frankly, makes you smile and smells a lot like a joke. Here Vlad III of Wallachia is a loyal and courageous sovereign, who loves his wife Mirena, dotes on his little son Ingeras, and does good for his people, trying to counter the Ottoman army led by the ruthless Sultan Mehmed II. When the villain, who is played by a ridiculous Dominic Cooper with eyeliner like Xerxes from "300," orders that Dracula's son must join the Turkish army, his father decides it is time to rebel against the invader and climbs a mountain where it is said a demon lives. The monster is really there, played by Charles Dance from "Last Action Hero" and "Game of Thrones," has the appearance of Death in "The Seventh Seal" and is actually a vampire, who in turn vampirizes Vlad. From this moment on, there is the iteration of the superhero who discovers his superpowers: hyper-developed hearing, fire vision, teleportation ability, super-strength, the inevitable "Kryptonite" (which here is silver, like for werewolves) and more. And all this happens just as it usually happens in Marvel films, or rather, as it happens in Spider-Man, in particular. And here come the braggadocio in a row that do not fit well with the image that all of us have of Dracula, which at a certain point also becomes epic fantasy, with battles like "The Lord of the Rings," which tell us how much screenwriters, producers, and director have made the wrong film. All this goes to betray the literary character of which the film culpably appropriates, misinterprets, and poorly rewrites the vampiric iconography, which suffers another hard blow after the rape of Stephenie Meyer and her "Twilight," and tells a completely falsified historical scenario. In short, a disaster. Moreover, "Dracula Untold," which cost a hundred dollars, takes advantage of many visual effects that unfortunately appear quite cheap, uses violence in a PG-13 way, and does not even stand out for the spectacularity of the action, of which it nevertheless forges on several occasions. Luke Evans looks too much like a model for the role he is called to wear, Sarah Gadon, who plays his wife, is a whining doll whose fate we care little about, Dominic Cooper – as already said – makes you smile for the look and is rather irrelevant. It is difficult to find a positive aspect in "Dracula Untold!" It seems that this film will be the first of the announced Monster Universe, that is, the relaunch of classic horror icons that Universal Pictures wants to undertake by looking at a multi-film project similar to the one developed by Marvel. At this point – also considering the open ending of "Dracula Untold" – we must expect one or more sequels and then a new Frankenstein, The Mummy, The Invisible Man, The Wolf Man, The Creature from the Black Lagoon and then a whole series of crossovers between this and that monster and then all the monsters together in the style of "The Avengers" and then... and then... enough, I would say!
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (5)

Andres Gomez

5 /10

FX, Evans and Dance's performances are the only things to save in this movie.

If you think Dracula becoming a hero and a martyr is a good idea, you will like it. Otherwise, like in my case, you will think that it was the worst idea in quite some time.

So, Dracula is not the most evil creature in the world any more ... :(

Dark Jedi

8 /10

That the so called “critics” at Rotten Tomatoes screws this movie over is not really a surprise. Said “critics” are usually out of sync with both my opinions and the opinions of most of the viewers which can be seen again from the fact that these people give this movie a 23% rating whereas the actual viewers give it a 60% rating. At lot of “purists” also seem to take a disliking to this movie. Well, the movie is named Dracula Untold so it should be no surprise that the story would be a new one.

Personally I found this movie quite enjoyable. Yes it is not the original Dracula story but it is not straying too far from the basic origins and it is really a quite decent story unlike some of the disastrous Hollywood rewrites. The original story claims that Dracula became a vampire during his battles with the Turks and this movie picks up on that and tells the story of how that happened. Unlike most (all?) Dracula movies, Dracula is not really the bad guy but rather the inverse and the movie tells a story about sacrifices and Dracula’s quest to keep some of his humanity, moral and sanity.

It would not be a Dracula movie without some blood flowing and this movie delivers without overdoing it. Actually the actual bloodsucking stuff is quite played down until the end of the movie. There are a fair amount of fights against the Turks (who are the real bad guys in this movie) though and blood as well as various body parts no longer attached to their proper places does float around quite a bit. The special effects are not forgotten and I quite liked the bat swarms that Dracula commanded during the final fights against the Turks.

I found Luke Evans performance as the prince and unwilling Dracula to be quite good. The rest of the characters were also well played. I am sure that none of them will be nominated for Oscars due to their part in this movie but I have nothing negative to say about their performance.

On the whole I found this movie quite enjoyable and I definitely disagree with all the people blasting it. I did also quite like the last couple of scenes in modern time at the end which teased of a follow up movie. I would definitely like to see that happen.

Wuchak

Wuchak

7 /10

Dracula: The dark Superman

RELEASED IN 2014 and directed by Gary Shore, "Dracula Untold” tells the origin of Dracula: In the 15th century Prince Vlad the Impaler (Luke Evans) must protect his small kingdom of Wallachia (in modern-day Romania) from a Turk warlord (Dominic Cooper) who demands a thousand boys from Wallachia & Transylvania, including Vlad’s son. Threatened by the unsurmountable Turk army, Vlad desperately makes a dubious pact with a formidable caged vampire in order to acquire its dark powers and save his family & kingdom. Sarah Gadon plays Vlad’s winsome wife.

The producers flirted with the idea of “Dracula Untold” being part of Universal’s Dark Universe; and the epilogue of the movie, set in the modern world, suggests this, insinuating a franchise. This idea was dropped, however, and “The Mummy” (2017) became the first official film in the Dark Universe. In any case, “Dracula Untold” was fairly successful at the Box Office, making $56.3 million in North America and $217.1 million worldwide against a cost of $70 million.

My title blurb pretty much tells you all you need to know: “Dracula Untold” is basically the dark Superman of 15th century Eastern Europe where Dracula wields the power to defeat a thousand-man army. If you like the great prologue to Coppola’s “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” (1992), you’ll probably like this movie, which gives several nods to that forerunner.

The film LOOKS awesome and has a fine cast. But unlike “Bram Stoker’s Dracula,” it’s rapidly paced and doesn’t leave much room to breathe; so the characterizations aren’t quite deep enough. It’s good, but somehow hollow and forgettable. “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” was perhaps a little too slow while “Dracula Untold” is too hurried. I wish the creators found the happy medium between the two because, with just a little bit more time and attention to detail, it could’ve been great.

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour, 32 minutes and was shot entirely in Northern Ireland. WRITERS: Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless.

GRADE: B

tmdb28039023

1 /10

Bram Stoker's Count Dracula is textbook example of my Evil Iceberg Theory (the less you see of and know about a villain, the better). In an epistolary novel, the title character is the only one who doesn’t set his thoughts down in letters or in a diary (or, like Dr. Seward, a phonograph recording).

If, as Lovecraft wrote, "The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown," then Dracula is the embodiment of this fear; inscrutable, unknowable, unreachable, impossible to negotiate or reason with.

Moreover, it’s futile to try to assign him complex motivation; like the shark in Jaws or Dr. Lecter, the Count kills to feed — no more, no less. Taking all this into account, it's easy to see how bad an idea Dracula Untold really is.

The story is narrated — a long time after it took place, though oddly in the same childlike voice the narrator had when the events trasnspired — by Ingeras (Art Parkinson), son of Vlad III Draculea, aka the Impaler, aka Son of the Dragon, aka Son of the Devil, aka Dracula; let's just call him Vlad (Luke Evans).

"In the year of our Lord 1442, the Turkish sultan enslaved 1,000 children from Transylvania to fill the ranks of his army." One of these children grew up to become Vlad, who "disgusted by his monstrous deeds ... buried his past with the dead and returned to Transylvania to rule in peace." So Vlad just took his ball and went home. Just like that, no revolt required. Someone should tell the Sultan how slavery really works.

This notwithstanding, Wallachia and Transylvania remain under Ottoman rule, and Vlad must pay an annual tribute to Sultan Mehmed II (Dominic Cooper); one can't help wondering why these two peoples are so hostile to each other, especially seeing how they share the lingua franca of British English.

Mehmed takes it upon himself to 'enslaving' a thousand other children (perhaps the first thousand just walked away like Vlad?), including Ingeras. Vlad refuses, and knowing that this means war, goes to a cave in a mountain to seek help from "a vampire. From the Greek word pi, to drink [actually 'pi' is a Greek letter; the language in which it is a word that means 'drink' or 'suck' is Albanian]. The beast was once a mortal man who summoned a demon from the depths of hell to barter for his dark power. The demon deceived the man, granting his wish, but his price was an eternity condemned to the darkness of that cave, where he remains until he finds another to free him."

The cave vampire (Charles Dance), who once was a Roman and thus speaks, like all Romans do in the movies, the Queen's English, gives Vlad a sip of his blood, and with it “a taste of my power. The strength of 100 men. The speed of a shooting star. Domain of the night and all its creatures. See and hear through your senses. Even heal grievous wounds ... Once you drink, your thirst for human blood will be insatiable. But if you can hold out for three days, you will return to your mortal state having tasted my power, and perhaps saved your people. [What if I feed?] I will be freed having granted the darkness a worthy offering. You will become … like me. A scourge on this earth destined to destroy everything you love… I, however, will be free to unleash my wrath against the one who betrayed me. And one day, I will call upon you to serve me, my pawn, in an immortal game of revenge."

All this does is show that sometimes no explanation is the best explanation. Let's compare Coppola’s Dracula, in whose introduction — featuring modern Romanian dialogue with medieval English syntax (perhaps not historically correct but still much better than English-English) — Gary Oldman plunges his sword into the stone cross of a chapel, and drinks the blood that flows from it.

This doesn't necessarily make any more sense, but at least it's short and to the point, and Coppola has the good sense to not even try to explain it.

Conversely, all of Dracula Untold’s heavy exposition only raises more questions than it answers. How did this Roman guy end up in Transylvania? Are there no caves in Rome? Why can't he leave the cave and Vlad can? What exactly does "an immortal game of revenge" mean? This phrase simply reeks of oxymoron.

Speaking of Coppola, he was the second to make the character of Dracula and the historical Dracula one and the same person, and add a Reincarnation Romance to the plot (the first was Dan Curtis in his own 1974 Bram Stoker's Dracula, written by Richard Matheson).

Director Gary Shore and screenwriters Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless repeat the formula in Dracula Untold, but their mistake is making an entire movie out of this premise. If they had done their homework, they would know that the link to Vlad III is tenuous at best, and that the real and probably only reason Stoker used the name 'Dracula' is because he was under the mistaken impression that it meant 'devil' in Romanian (but who knows; maybe the confusion of ' Greek pi' with Albanian 'pi' was a tribute to this linguistic faux pas on the Irish author’s part).

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

6 /10

I think you have to treat this depiction of Dracula on it's own merits. There is no point comparing it with anything you've seen already. Given that, it is a perfectly watchable, and forgettable, adventure film with Luke Evans as Prince Vlad making the vampiric equivalent of a "deal with the devil" with Charles Dance to prevent his family and his kingdom from being over-run by the Turks. Dominic Cooper is really terrible as the Ottoman Sultan, though - his accent sounds like it's been finessed in his local kebab shop after too many tequila slammers on a Friday night. Evans is fine in the role, there is plenty of action and the visual effects are adequate too. Expect nothing earth shattering and you won't be let down.

Reviews provided by TMDB