IMMORTALS
Enloquecido por el poder, el brutal rey Hiperión ha declarado la guerra a los hombres. Después de reunir a un ejército sediento de sangre formado por soldados que él mismo mandó desfigurar, Hiperión quema Grecia mientras busca un arma de poder inconcebible: el legendario arco Epiro, hecho por Ares en el Olimpo. El hombre que posea ese arco podrá liberar a los Titanes, que están encerrados en el monte Tártaro desde el principio de los tiempos, y claman venganza. Sin embargo, en manos de Hiperión, el arco significaría la destrucción de la raza humana y la aniquilación de los dioses. La ley prohíbe que los dioses se entrometan en los conflictos humanos, y nada pueden hacer para detener al rey. Pero la esperanza renace cuando Zeus encomienda al campesino Teseo la misión de acabar con Hiperión.
Directores
Reparto
Henry Cavill
Theseus
Mickey Rourke
King Hyperion
Stephen Dorff
Stavros
Freida Pinto
Phaedra
Luke Evans
Zeus
John Hurt
Old Zeus
Joseph Morgan
Lysander
Isabel Lucas
Athena
Kellan Lutz
Poseidon
Daniel Sharman
Ares
Peter Stebbings
Helios
Stephen McHattie
Cassander
Greg Bryk
The Monk
Alan van Sprang
Dareios
Anne Day-Jones
Aethra
Steve Byers
Heracles
Matthew G. Taylor
Mondragon (King's Guard)
Romano Orzari
Icarus
Corey Sevier
Apollo
Conrad Pla
Jailer
Equipo
RESEÑAS (1)
Dónde Ver
Streaming
Sky Go
Now TV
Anni Duemila Amazon Channel
Alquilar
Apple TV
Amazon Video
Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies
Comprar
Apple TV
Amazon Video
Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies
RESEÑAS DE LA COMUNIDAD
(4)
Andres Gomez
Total failure of doing a movie with the aesthetics and success of "300".
Mediocre story, bad planned action scenes, tons of Fx, poorly developed characters and tons of stereotypes.
Gimly
Everyone talks about how Immortals is a 300 ripoff, and don't get me wrong, it absolutely is, but I haven't yet seen anyone talk about how it's also a bit of a God of War ripoff.
I'm actually quite fond of historically-set mythology films, but I don't believe the problem with Immortals isn't the setting or the genre, it's the motivation behind its being made the way it was. The 300 movie exists to be an adaptation of the 300 comic book, the Immortals movie exists because the 300 movie made money. (Don't get me wrong, I know that the real motivation behind both these, and of any other studio film, is money. But someone involved somewhere has to want more from their movie than that. And Immortals doesn't give me the vibe that anyone did).
I can handle Immortals doing what 300 does. Hell, if enough people rip an idea off over a long enough period of time, in movies, we call that a genre. My issue is that it only exists to do what 300 did, yet it does all of it so much worse. There are maybe two fights in Immortals that last for longer than 30 seconds, even with all that slow-mo stretching the runtime, and neither are filmed as well as the ones in 300. It's nowhere near as fun, it's not superior in any technical category, it's harder to tell what the fuck is going on. Even the acting, which is NOT 300's strong suit, is worse here than it is there. There were maybe flashes where you could glimpse a cohesive idea that desired to form, but it never even got close.
Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product.
RalphRahal
Immortals is like stepping into a Greek mythology fever dream where everyone looks like they just walked out of a tanning booth, but hey, it works for the aesthetic. The movie is a visual powerhouse, with Tarsem Singh crafting a bold, surreal take on mythology that feels more like a painting in motion than your average action flick. The fight scenes are undeniably the highlight, stylized, brutal, and dripping with energy. Henry Cavill shines as Theseus, delivering a performance that feels grounded amidst the chaos, while Mickey Rourke's Hyperion brings an intimidating presence, even if his character lacks complexity.
Where Immortals stumbles is in its story, which feels more like a vehicle for the visuals than an engaging narrative. The characters are serviceable, but most lack depth, leaving you wanting more from the emotional stakes. That said, if you’re here for striking visuals, intense action, and a unique twist on Greek mythology, it’s still a fun ride. Think of it as a movie you watch for the spectacle--not for the substance. Worth watching if you’re in the mood for a stylized, no-strings-attached mythological adventure.
CinemaSerf
The megalomanic Hyperion (Mickey Rourke) is bent on releasing the imprisoned Titans from their gilded cage deep inside the mountain. Using a magical bow and arrow he's stolen from Ares (Daniel Sharman) he is about to cause havoc when Zeus (Luke Evans) engages the services of Theseus (Henry Cavill) to help thwart his plans and thus save the Greeks from tyranny. With some sagely advice from John Hurt, he now embarks on a lively series of escapades that allows the full panoply of mythological beasts, a shirtless hero and lots of entertaining visual effects to fill a couple of hours. No, the acting isn't really great nor is the script, but it's a vehicle for some beautiful people to present some intricately choreographed action scenes whilst the CGI boys do their best to create an atmosphere that's ideal for this story of the mortal trying to save the day. Rourke delivers well, if really quite sparingly, as the menacing baddie and there's always Stephen Dorff to add to the bevvy of hunks on display here. If you like the genre, and I do, then this isn't really very substantial and the story all rather weak, but this isn't really about a story it's about a computer-enhanced aesthetic showcasing some handsome people plundering ancient legend for our entertainment. It's not "Clash of the Titans" (1981) but it's not terrible, either - and that metal roasting cow - yikes!
Reseñas proporcionadas por TMDB
Comentarios