A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Child backdrop
A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Child poster

A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET: THE DREAM CHILD

1989 US HMDB
August 11, 1989

The pregnant Alice finds Freddy Krueger striking through the sleeping mind of her unborn child, hoping to be reborn into the real world.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Rupert Harvey (Producer)Robert Shaye (Producer)Sara Risher (Executive Producer)Jon Turtle (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Leslie Bohem (Screenplay)John Skipp (Story)Craig Spector (Story)
Music: Jay Ferguson (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Peter Levy (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Massimo Filograna
It has been a year since the last confrontation with Freddy. Alice is now a woman and is about to become a mother. The problem is that Alice's unborn child, having inherited his mother's medium abilities, has the unconscious ability to call Freddy from the grave. And so, our Freddy "Steel Claw" prepares a new plan: to reincarnate by replacing the baby's soul in Alice's womb with his own. But to do this, he needs energy and therefore new souls. The first victim will be the baby's father, who, having survived the fourth chapter, here finds a horrible end by merging in full speed with his motorcycle and crashing into a truck. Alice this time seems unable to stop Krueger's plan, as the key to Fred's power is enclosed in the very soul of the baby growing in her womb, which inhibits her powers... But fortunately, the ghost of Sister Amanda Krueger, Freddy's mother, will intervene to thwart the plan of her malevolent son. The film's atmosphere returns to that of the first two. Freddy is less "likable" and much more cynical. The jokes are cutting, less witty, but we are light-years away from the character created by Craven. Insipid, rushed, and predictable ending. The real title was "The Dreamchild", but the usual unreliable Italian distributors titled it "Il Mito" for obscure reasons. The same cinematic version, according to an interview given by Hopkins himself, was mutilated by 15 minutes of splatter scenes, and some sequences (like the one with the fridge) have become incomprehensible. The same fate of the baby remains a mystery, and indeed, in the sequel, there will be no trace of Alice or her son, who was supposed to be, according to the screenwriter's intentions, the dream child who would then kill Freddy in his own playground: the dream. Good special effects and the performance of mother Alice and Sister Amanda. But in the end, it leaves the viewer with a sense of incompleteness.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

John Chard

John Chard

5 /10

Kids... always a disappointment.

*** This review contains an implied spoiler in last paragraph ***

By the time A Nightmare on Elm Street had rolled around to this, part five, Freddy Krueger had long stopped being a scary bogeyman. He was now a figure of fun, a purveyor of one line quips, while the makers were desperately trying to come up with new ideas in which to have the pizza faced Krueger still exist, and thus have more films for him to be in...

Here we are sold the idea that a foetus can dream, so not only do we get a horror staple of sex being bad for you, but it lets Freddy (Robert Englund) back in the fold - in this another garbled screenplay. Cue friends of the pregnant Alice Johnson (Lisa Wilcox) being stalked and offed by the old stinky green and red jumper killer.

It's all very frenetic and cartoonish, with gore replacing scares. There's a little ingenuity with some of the kills, such as a comic book section that has a good thought process, but once the laughable finale arrives - cuz - like - love conquers all - then you may be digging out parts 1 & 3 to remind yourself how good this series used to be. 5/10

Andre Gonzales

Andre Gonzales

6 /10

This one was just ok. For some reason the kid in this movie just bothered me. Yea he looked scary but he was a bad actor. The movie itself would have been better with a different actor or just cut him out altogether.

Reviews provided by TMDB