The Lazarus Effect backdrop
The Lazarus Effect poster

THE LAZARUS EFFECT

2015 • US HMDB
January 29, 2015

Medical researcher Frank, his fiancee Zoe and their team have achieved the impossible: they have found a way to revive the dead. After a successful, but unsanctioned, experiment on a lifeless animal, they are ready to make their work public. However, when their dean learns what they've done, he shuts them down. Zoe is killed during an attempt to recreate the experiment, leading Frank to test the process on her. Zoe is revived -- but something evil is within her.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Jason Blum (Producer)Matt Kaplan (Producer)Jimmy Miller (Producer)Cody Zwieg (Producer)
Screenplay: Luke Dawson (Screenplay)Jeremy Slater (Screenplay)
Music: Sarah Schachner (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Michael Fimognari (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Vincenzo de Divitiis •
A group of ambitious and highly intelligent researchers, led by Frank and Zoe and immortalized by a young documentary filmmaker in search of sensational footage, crown their long studies with the discovery of a serum capable of bringing the dead back to life, named "Lazarus". The first experiment on a dog proves successful, but shortly afterward, the university halts the research due to lack of proper authorizations. The group, however, does not lose heart and decides to continue testing the serum in secret, with all the risks involved, which materialize in an accident in which Zoe loses her life. Frank, who is also Zoe's boyfriend, cannot accept the idea of losing his beloved and decides to try the serum on her. The operation is a perfect success, but once awakened, Zoe is no longer the same, and the protagonists realize they have awakened malevolent forces. It is the beginning of an endless nightmare... If we were to draw up a genealogical tree of horror for fun, we would undoubtedly assign the role of the mother to Mary Shelley. With her most famous novel dating back to 1818, "Frankenstein," the English writer forever marked the genre and initiated the union between the horrific universe and the world of medicine, which has greatly contributed to the success of literature and cinema. From 1931 onwards, the year James Whale brought the myth of the "modern Prometheus" to the screen for the first time, the screens began to teem with mad doctors who, blinded by their hubris and the desire to replace God, attempt in every way to bring the dead back to life and create a perfect and immortal man. Thus, a consolidated and profitable archetype is born, which sees numerous reenactments over the years, not without the inclusion of some modifications and variations; suffice it to think of the "Re-Animator" series by Staurt Gordon and Brian Yuzna (inspired by the story "Herbert West Reanimator" by another father of fantastic narrative like H.P. Lovecraft), in which the tones became decidedly more splatter and bloody, or the Italian Gothic films of the 1960s that featured mad scientists also dedicated to more extreme practices such as necrophilia. In short, we are talking about a cornerstone of the genre, on par with vampires and zombies. And it is not strange, therefore, that the king of low-budget horror, Jason Blum, also wanted to hitch a ride on this rather lucrative bandwagon, who does not miss this opportunity and decides to produce a film that tells the myth of Frankenstein in a modern key, "The Lazarus Effect." At the helm, we find David Gelb, a documentary filmmaker making his debut in the horror genre, who shows some interesting points, not accompanied, however, by originality that is greatly absent from this film made-to-order for the general public. Despite the subject being one of the most overdone in cinema history, Gelb manages to put together a first part of the film that has a personality all its own and, above all, does not fall into the trap of turning it into a long and boring introduction before the predictable explosion of violence and death. All the credit for this goes to a screenplay (written by Luke Dawson and Jeremy Slater) that is precise and punctual in describing all the scientific aspects and attentive to providing a sketch of the characterization of the protagonist Zoe, a fundamental aspect in the second part. Alongside this attention to the plot, however, the director does not refrain from inserting a fair dose of tension right from the start, such as the unsettling scene of the dog that climbs onto the doctor's bed in the middle of the night and stares at her in a threatening pose or the nightmare that has tormented the protagonist for years and takes her back to a dark and murky past. The good things about this first part, however, are marred by a second half that is predictable and overly laden with all the typical clichés of contemporary horror cinema: and so, free rein is given to an excessive use of sound jumps, sudden appearances to seek an easy scare, and movements by Zoe that blatantly refer to the trend of demonic possessions, complete with vomiting and levitating body. Despite this, Gelb manages to score some decent moments of fear played entirely on the atmosphere, enhanced by a photography that makes the laboratory environments dark and infernal, and on a musical accompaniment of strong impact: noteworthy is the suggestive and clever use of the Queen of the Night aria from "The Magic Flute" by Mozart that underscores one of the most unsettling sequences. Too bad for some makeshift graphic effects present within dreamlike parts that are not very fluid and inserted with approximation into a plot that becomes increasingly messy and channeled onto well-worn tracks. To give a significant contribution and to shoulder the film is the star Olivia Wilde, who had already flirted with horror in the modest "Turistas," very effective in such a diabolical role and the true diamond point of a cast of good level formed, among others, by the good Mark Duplass and Evan Peters, known to many for the series "American Horror Story." "The Lazarus Effect" is therefore a decent product of entertainment, but to see something innovative and courageous, knock on another door. In short, for the general public, it may work, but for those more literate in the genre, it is not much.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads Amazon Prime Video with Ads

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (3)

RodJ

RodJ

7 /10

Well, it's not terribly original with some obvious connections with Frankenstein and other horror films of that type but I enjoyed it overall. It was quite scary in places and even though the scares were quite contrived for the most part, it did make me jump at times. The special effects were quite well done but could have been expanded a bit more. I gave it 3 1/2 stars.

Reno

Reno

6 /10

The stimulated brain terrorising!

Actually, this film was made before 'Lucy', but released after that. So I first saw that and now this. Basically, these two films are similar thematic, except the genres are different. I liked Scarlett's film, a very much enjoyable. This film too looked nice, and watching it after that makes to understand it better. I meant scientifically, rather than a supernatural way. So what's extra in this was the usual horror film style jumpy scenes, with loud and sudden sounds.

Limited cast, and one day event based film. Not a bad writing or the direction and performances. The settings were perfect, and the film did not require strong graphics. The story followed a small medical researcher team who is working on a serum that brings the dead back to life. When their entire work was ceased by the company they were working for, they decide to recreate everything to prove its theirs. Then something goes wrong, following a series of destruction before it all ends.

Like I said, it was more a science-fictional thriller than your regular horror film. But it borrowed the same style to present on the screen. The events are simple to understand, except that scientific thing. Because there won't be any difference for those who are weak in basic science. It'll be another normal boring horror flick. For me, it's an average film, watchable for once being short and well paced narration.

6/10

The Movie Mob

The Movie Mob

5 /10

The Lazarus Effect showed some promise but couldn’t decide what to do once the horror began.

The Lazarus Effect had a decent premise - scientists attempting to discover a method to resurrect the recently deceased are forced to test their new experimental treatment on one of their team after she dies in an accident. Only she doesn’t come back the same. She returns sinister, malevolent, and murderous. That concept with a production company like Blumhouse and a cast boasting Olivia Wilde, Donald Glover, and Evan Peters made me think this had to be a solid horror flick. Unfortunately, it didn’t live up to my hopes. The writers of Lazarus Effect couldn’t decide the rules for their own movie. Is evil Zoe battling with the darkness trying to take over, or just evil? Is she superpowered? Is she demonic? Is she preying on the others or just twisted? The script never seemed to figure out what they wanted the character to be. With Zoe being the central focus and character, the failure to solidify and develop her character sunk the rest of the film. Still not the worst. I liked the open ending with the terror multiplying for a potential sequel, but with a mediocre response to this film, a sequel will never happen. The Lazarus Effect doomed itself never to be resurrected.

Reviews provided by TMDB