Poltergeist backdrop
Poltergeist poster

POLTERGEIST

2015 • US HMDB
May 20, 2015

A family's suburban home is invaded by angry spirits. When the terrifying apparitions escalate their attacks and take the youngest daughter, the family must come together to rescue her.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: John Powers Middleton (Executive Producer)Becki Cross Trujillo (Executive Producer)Robert Tapert (Producer)Roy Lee (Producer)Sam Raimi (Producer)J.R. Young (Executive Producer)Audrey Chon (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: David Lindsay-Abaire (Screenplay)
Music: Marc Streitenfeld (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Javier Aguirresarobe (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Vincenzo de Divitiis •
The Bowen family, consisting of Eric and Amy and their three children Kendra, Griffin, and Madison, quickly went from a prosperous condition to a rather severe economic crisis, caused by the dismissal of the head of the family and the unemployment of his wife. This situation forces the Bowens to change houses and move into a smaller, less comfortable villa on the outskirts, which creates discomfort and bad moods, especially in the eldest daughter Kendra. But the worst is yet to come. Strange presences begin to manifest themselves through the electronic devices of the house, and the one who perceives them more directly is Madison, who from the very beginning interacts with mysterious friends hidden inside the wardrobe of her bedroom and inside the living room television. A dangerous friendship that will lead the little girl to be kidnapped by demons into another dimension from which it will be very difficult to bring her back. To save their beloved daughter, the parents turn to a team of mediums who will engage in a long duel with the dark forces that inhabit the house. Remake or not remake? This is the banal and timely question that torments and divides horror enthusiasts every time we find ourselves faced with a practice that has become very fashionable, even abused, in the last fifteen years, which only makes sense in the case where the plot of the original model is used to tell something new with different methods and points of view, as happened with the excellent "The House" by Fede Alvarez and "Dawn of the Dead" by Zack Snyder. These two, however, are only some of the few successful titles in the difficult task of revitalizing and renewing past works, since the list of remakes ready to swell the ranks of the detractors of such practice is quite substantial and would be a long exercise to repeat it here. Another victim of this commercial machine this time is "Poltergeist - Demoniacal Presences", a cult film of 1982 directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, which is given a second life thanks to the Israeli director Gil Kenan, who, under the protective wing of a Sam Raimi here as a producer, brings to life a film that fully enters the special classification of the most useless and ugly remakes of the last decade, and also with good chances of placing itself in the high ranks of this unflattering ranking. As soon as the viewing is over, it is difficult to remember all the blunders of a film that has the great demerit of inserting very few elements of novelty compared to the original and copying the film by Hooper in every way, thus accepting a comparison already lost from the start. Kenan, in fact, not only falls into the trap of referring too shamelessly to a model so dated but also tries to adapt it to the rhythms and methods of staging of our time. On screen, we thus witness representations that, more than instilling fear, descend into the ridiculous and contribute to stripping of all their horrific charge those elements strongly iconic in the 1982 film: the tree, here, becomes a simple piece of wood that does not scare even a child, the clown doll is clumsy, and the demons created in computer graphics show a rough care. The director, therefore, appears totally ignorant of all the mechanisms of tension, and the photography of Javier Aguirresarobe only worsens the situation with its absolute inadequacy in creating unsettling atmospheres that know how to touch the genuine chords of terror. A general mediocrity that becomes more and more evident and culminates in a disappointing ending, as was to be expected, in which a car flies and crashes into the house in full disaster movie style and a journey into the other dimension that, although not a bad idea, is rendered poorly due to images similar to a low-quality video game. But the horrific aspect is not the only discordant note of the film. As if it were not enough, Kenan also botches his only attempt to introduce something of his own, describing in a clumsy and messy way a family in economic crisis (in Hooper's film, the Freelings were the typical well-off American middle-class family) without, however, explaining in detail how and why they are in such a state of discomfort. The situation worsens with the performance of a cast that is generally not up to the task and includes, in addition to Sam Rockwell, Rosemarie DeWitt, and Kennedi Clements, a Jared Harris whose talent is nullified by a character who, inserted in place of the legendary Tangina, more than a ghostbuster resembles an out-of-place exorcist and protagonist of jokes bordering on the grotesque. In conclusion, therefore, "Poltergeist" is a bad and forgettable film both as a remake and as a standalone film.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Timvision Timvision

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (5)

Zevi Wolmark

It’s not the worst remake of all time, but it’s just ordinary. It’s bland, lifeless, vanilla, and feels like what the Lifetime Channel in America would do to a remake of the Tobe Spielberg classic haunting film. I think the only reason Gil Kenan was hired for this movie was because the movie is based around a monster house and he depicted a monster so well in his last film that the job only seemed like a no brainer. The problem is Kenan forgets to produce likable characters and interesting scares during the process of producing an evil possessed house. - Zevi Wolmark

Reno

Reno

5 /10

Would have been a better film if it was an original.

Unnecessary to compare this with the original and I tried, but impossible to avoid it since it's an official remake. Everything, from the house to frame by frame, all the scenes looked the same, except the cast and it's set in the present world with the daily life's modern gadgets. If you had not seen the 80s film, then there's a little chance you might like it. Though it was not a serious horror movie, or a scary movie to consider, still quite enjoyable like a dark comedy in parts. But I recommend the old one.

Really? Sam Rockwell? He did not fit in the role, just okay though. And the kids, did not impress me as like the original movie. The only upgrade in this new version was the technology, CRT monitors to LED kind of stuffs. I expected a major, at least a bit alteration in the story or the screenplay that sets in a different circumstances and the location. That could have been a lot better. Disappoints for those who loved the first version. However, that movie deserved to be remade, and I did not think it would end like this. Hoping for a better sequel, but I'm already feeling that would end in the hands of the second string cast and crew which could be a cheap horror-thrill.

5/10

talisencrw

7 /10

I had huge reservations about watching this remake, which I felt was completely unnecessary. It wasn't as bad as I had anticipated, and that the bad reviews at the time gave me the impression I should fear or avoid watching it. The special effects were pretty good, and Sam Rockwell, Jared Harris and Jane Adams (how wonderful it was to see her again, after her exceptional work in 'Happiness'!) sold the film for me. I knew what to expect after liking, but not loving, director Gil Kenan's earlier animated 'Monster House', but I was intrigued how his energetic directing would transfer to live-action work.

I think they could have made it more suspenseful and scary, but I'm not really sure that was their intention. I think they were going for a family experience with some thrills, chills and laughs...such as the recent 'Ghostbusters' remake was going for. If that was the case, then in that regard it was quite successful. I'm looking forward to re-watching this eventually with my 13-year-old son, horror-film aficionado, Julian, who like me adored the original.

If I was to make the perfect 'Poltergeist' film, I would have taken the same exact Steven Spielberg script and simply updated the special effects. I think that would have been a more successful approach.

Dark Jedi

4 /10

The movie blurb is written by some 20th Century Fox representative. I would guess that the person in question has not even watched the original movie. “Legendary film makers”? What a load of bull! These people have not produced anything really worth watching and this movie certainly do not improve on that score. I mean, how dumb are these people from 20th Century Fox? I certainly hope the audience are not dumb enough to fall for this obvious lie. Judging from the, well deserved mediocre score on various review sites I guess they did not.

Anyway, as for the movie. It is a bleak (cheap) shadow of the original. It has absolutely zero of the charm that the original movie had and, most importantly, none of the characters had anything of the charisma that the original characters had. The father is a total dumbass and an irresponsible at that. The mother could by just any Hollywood style housewife.

When you finally think that something interesting would happen, that is when the ghost hunter enters the scene, it just falls flat again. He is just totally lacking in appeal. He is neither a bad ass nor is he mysterious or anything else that makes him worth watching.

There are just so much things wrong with the story as well. How can this guy afford and get a one for a house when he apparently do not seem to have a job? He even manages to go for another house in the end after his original one apparently got shredded. How bloody dumb is the script writer? In the original it was a new neighbourhood which explained the “troubles”. In this one it is not which means that the script writer obviously had zero understanding of the original plot which brings us back to the same question again. What the f…?

There are some half decent CGI scenes in this movie but the same can be said for a lot of things coming out of the movie industry nowadays (well with the exception of SyFy productions of course).

I would say that as a TV-movie it would have been above average. As a remake of a classic it totally falls flat. I am happy that I watched it at home and did not spend time going to a theatre watching it.

r96sk

r96sk

5 /10

Lame horror.

<em>'Poltergeist'</em> offers nothing. It may not be an absolutely awful watch, but there's nothing about this that's good unfortunately. The story is largely predictable and plain, none of the cast give anything close to a performance that's worth remembering. There aren't many, if any, scares either - not great for a film in this genre.

As for the onscreen talent, it's slim pickings... not even Jared Harris' late appearance could save things. If I had to pick a standout, away from Harris, it would be Sam Rockwell. The two youngest kids, Kyle Catlett and Kennedi Clements, aren't terrible in fairness.

Not one I'll be revisiting. Yawnful.

Reviews provided by TMDB