Let Me In backdrop
Let Me In poster

LET ME IN

2010 SE HMDB
October 1, 2010

A bullied young boy befriends a young female vampire who lives in secrecy with her guardian. A remake of the movie “Let The Right One In” which was an adaptation of a book.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Simon Oakes (Producer)Philip Elway (Executive Producer)John Nordling (Producer)Guy East (Producer)Carl Molinder (Producer)John Ptak (Executive Producer)Nigel Sinclair (Executive Producer)Fredrik Malmberg (Executive Producer)Tobin Armbrust (Producer)Alexander Yves Brunner (Producer)Donna Gigliotti (Producer)
Screenplay: Matt Reeves (Screenplay)
Music: Michael Giacchino (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Greig Fraser (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
1983. Twelve-year-old Owen lives with his mother in a building in Los Alamos, New Mexico. The boy's life is spent in solitude, between long moments in the courtyard of his home and the terrible bullying of three bullies who bother him every day at school. One night, in the apartment next to Owen's, Abby moves in, a strange girl who walks around barefoot in the snow and is only seen when the sun sets. Initially distrustful, Abby begins to approach Owen and a friendship develops between them. But Abby is a vampire and has a constant need for blood. The Hammer Film Productions, the historic and glorious Anglo-Saxon production company, has been revived, changed ownership but seems to have started with similar intentions to those of the past. In "The Resident" they wanted Christopher Lee, the historic face of Dracula and many other Hammer films, as a co-star, with "Blood Story" they have acted on a dual aspect: recovery of the vampire icon and remake of an existing film. But this time we are not talking about films made a couple of decades earlier or more, as was the case with Dracula, Frankenstein or the Mummy, but a freshly produced work, the beautiful and innovative "Let the Right One In" that the Norwegian Tomas Alfredson derived in 2008 from the successful novel by John Ajvide Linqvist. Furthermore, unlike what happened with the aforementioned icons, this time the Hammer did not decide to completely reformulate the original story but allowed the director and screenwriter Matt Reeves to build a remake-photocopy, which is not so much another version of Linqvist's novel as a real and proper remake of Alfredson's film, given the same small infidelities to the original paper also proposed here. Therefore, as happened with quick remakes like "Quarantine," we reflect more than anything on the usefulness of operations like these up to trying to understand the why, which is to be found only and exclusively if we look at everything from the American perspective. In the States, foreign films are not dubbed and therefore those that arrive have the mother tongue with subtitles, and it goes without saying that products under these conditions have limited distribution/visibility and certainly are not for everyone. "Let the Right One In" by Alfredson had the same fate and "wasting" such a beautiful story in this way would have been a shame, so the remake operation started and this procedure applies to every recent non-American film remade by Americans. Obviously, we Europeans, or rather Italians, who have the possibility of enjoying both versions indistinctly, given the cinematic tradition entrusted to dubbing, we are indignant in front of these operations and it is not rare that we start with accusations of racism and/or the globalizing power of the American cultural industry without knowing in reality how the market works. With this I do not want to totally justify operations of this kind, but we must also think about the fact that "Let the Right One In" is a beautiful film and "Blood Story" only loses the comparison because we have already seen the previous one and we are stimulated by the sensation of total déjà-vu, otherwise the quality of Reeves' film is still very high. The director of "Cloverfield" rewrites the story of the little vampire setting it in Reagan-era New Mexico and smoothing out the morbid/sexual ambiguities that were hidden in the other film and especially in the novel. This is the main difference: Abby is a female vampire, there is no longer any element that can testify to her previous sexuality, just as that halo of budding homosexuality that seemed to surround the character of Oskar is not reproduced in Owen, thus defining the sexual roles of the two children in a more distinct way. Also, the pedophilic aspect that there linked the little vampire to her guardian is here slightly reduced by Owen's discovery of "proof" that clarifies the undefined relationship that exists between the elderly man and the girl. In turn, however, Reeves accentuates the more purely horrific aspect, giving the vampire a more monstrous appearance when she is hungry, making her move in an unnatural and more animalistic way when she is hunting and spreading more blood in the killings that thus result more violent. Reeves proves to be excellent behind the camera, preferring fixed shots, strange and "uncomfortable" angles, reflections and spreading an fascinating atmosphere of static resignation that fits well with the theme of solitude, predominant in the story. In many aspects, Reeves' style, completely opposite to that of the previous "Cloverfield," reminds of the first Shyamalan, that of "The Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable," for example, giving the film a clear vintage connotation. Good work by Greig Fraser on the photography, which tends to enhance the warm colors despite the film being set during a snowy and very cold winter and also very good the soundtrack by Michael Giacchino, which prefers atmospheric sounds, often also non-musical. It is interesting to note how Reeves has well characterized all the characters focusing more on the childish universe. In practice every character present in the story is framed from Owen's point of view, hence the absent mother is never framed in the face, the father is only a voice on the phone, the physical education teacher is essentially a good-for-nothing albeit willing, the neighbor an unattainable object of desire and the policeman an impotent victim to be sacrificed. Obviously all this also happened in Alfredson's film, Reeves however managed to readapt and perhaps exaggerate everything. Nothing to say about the work of the actors: perfect the two child protagonists Kodi Smit-McPhee, already seen alongside Viggo Mortensen in "The Road" and Chloe Moretz, unforgettable Hit Girl in "Kick-Ass." At their side it is a duty to mention the always great Richard Jenkins ("The Guest") in the role of Abby's guardian and Elias Koteas ("The Messenger") in that of the policeman who deals with the case of the mysterious deaths. "Blood Story" is as beautiful as it is unnecessary. Stephen King defined it as the best horror film of the last twenty years, a statement perhaps a bit exaggerated but understandable...only that Stephen King is probably one of the many Americans who have not seen "Let the Right One In." Watch the Backstage of BLOOD STORY
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

Rob

See the original, not this one.

s6kx

s6kx

6 /10

1. In the official promotional trailer for the film, Abby appears in some scenes violently shuddering or convulsing through a computer-generated visual effect before attacking one of her victims, and also when she entered Owen's apartment without being invited in. However, this computer-generated visual effect of this trembling or convulsion has been removed from the film's scenes and cannot be found within the movie. Therefore, one star out of ten will be deducted.

2. Actor Richard Jenkins, who plays the character believed to be Abby's father or guardian, pours a corrosive substance on his face to conceal his identity from the police for an unclear reason. If he wanted to die rather than be imprisoned, he could have simply shot himself. If he wanted to both conceal his identity and die so that the police couldn't identify him after death, he could have detonated a hand grenade on himself instead of pouring a corrosive substance on his face, as it would erase his features without notable suffering. I don't believe he wanted to hide his identity and live disfigured for the rest of his life, as imprisonment without disfigurement compared to the torture of disfigurement by a corrosive substance would be a better option. Therefore, he had two better alternatives than suffering disfigurement by a corrosive substance until death: the first option being imprisonment without disfigurement if he was willing to have his identity revealed, or the second option of detonating a hand grenade on himself if he was unwilling to have his identity revealed. Nevertheless, he chose the worst, illogical, unrealistic option which the film failed to justify. Why to such an extent did he not want his identity discovered? If that would endanger Abby, then why didn't the film clarify that? Even if we assume the film did clarify that, the hand grenade option would still be better for concealing identity and dying together. Don't tell me he didn't want to die when he used the corrosive substance or that he didn't know it would torture him to death. He undoubtedly knew. So why die in agony when he could die without notable suffering? Nothing can explain this except that he wanted to punish himself for his sins of killing many innocent people. But since the film didn't clarify this, I cannot rely on this justification nor can it be considered valid. He should have said something before pouring the corrosive substance, such as "Let this be atonement for my sins," for this justification to be valid and for me to accept it. Since that didn't happen, another star out of ten will be deducted.

3. When Owen sneaked out to Abby's house, he had left his home while his mother was sleeping on the couch in the living room. No scenes were filmed showing his arrival at Abby's house, her welcoming him, what they did that night, and how he ended up lying and sleeping on the floor of Abby's house despite the existence of better places to sleep. For example, he could have slept on the couch in Abby's living room, but he didn't. Why not? The reason was never clarified!

4. After the police officer played by actor Elias Koteas entered the bathroom where Abby was sleeping in the bathtub, Abby killed him, and in a later scene, we find that the police officer's body was hidden in a hole in the wall of an apartment frequented by a boy who used to live in the building, named Tommy. This boy appears to be Owen's friend, otherwise Owen wouldn't have known about his secret hideout where he goes to drink and smoke with his high school companions. Or perhaps Owen simply discovered this information by chance because he often loiters outside and voyeuristically watches people through his binoculars in his room. So one way or another, Owen was able to know about this place. But the problem doesn't lie here; it lies in the fact that the police officer's body was hidden in this place in an absurdly ridiculous manner. It wasn't shown who did this, but it was likely done by Abby or with Abby's participation. It's inconceivable that Abby, who is accustomed to killing, would hide the body without covering the hole with anything, whether through cement, plaster, a piece of wood, or an amount of pillow stuffing and fabric. Leaving the body exposed in this way was illogical for a character accustomed to killing because there was simply no benefit to hiding the body in this manner. They went through the trouble of hiding it without any purpose; the smell would emanate from it in a short period and spread throughout the neighborhood, and neighbors would soon smell it and bring the police. I know that Abby and Owen escaped at the end of the film, but their escape won't last as long as the body will be discovered within a few days of their escape. The body will be linked to their escape along with the recent rumors circulated by investigators, and it will be easy to find a connection between them even if it doesn't seem logical for children of their age. Their escape will create a question mark that forces investigators to discover what lies behind it. Therefore, it was mentally unacceptable for Abby, who is accustomed to killing, to bury the police officer's body in this way, which would expose her escape operation with Owen to discovery and then destroy their future together.

Reviews provided by TMDB