Pumpkinhead 3 - Ceneri alle Ceneri poster

PUMPKINHEAD 3 - CENERI ALLE CENERI

Pumpkinhead: Ashes to Ashes

2006 RO HMDB
ottobre 28, 2006

Ha gettato i loro cari in una palude. Ora vogliono vendetta... Ma quando un demone fa il suo lavoro sporco, ha un prezzo.

Registi

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Commenti

Commenti (0)

Troupe

Produzione: Reuben Liber (Executive Producer)Pierre Spengler (Producer)Brad Krevoy (Producer)Karri O'Reilly (Executive Producer)Donald Kushner (Producer)
Sceneggiatura: Barbara Werner (Screenplay)Jake West (Screenplay)John Werner (Writer)
Musica: Rob Lord (Original Music Composer)
Fotografia: Erik Wilson (Director of Photography)

RECENSIONI (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
In un tranquillo paesino di provincia americano, Doc Fraser, il dottore del paese, aiutato da una famiglia di contadini, trafuga cadaveri dall’obitorio per estrarre organi e rivenderli sul mercato nero. Quando viene ritrovata la fossa comune nei pressi di una palude, i cittadini infuriati chiedono vendetta contro coloro che hanno osato dissacrare i resti dei loro cari defunti, ma i colpevoli rimangono alle autorità sconosciuti. In questa situazione, la giovane Molly Sue Ellen, che ha riconosciuto tra i cadaveri martoriati anche quello della sua bambina defunta pochi mesi prima, insieme ad altri tre paesani, si reca da una vecchia fattucchiera che vive nel bosco, per trovare nella magia i nomi di coloro che sono stati responsabili di tanto orrore. La vecchia, allora, tramite un rituale, riporta in vita Pumpkinhead, un demone della vendetta che cercherà ed eliminerà coloro che hanno commesso un torto ai suoi evocatori. Dopo dodici anni esatti dall’ultimo film (“Pupkinhead 2: Blood Wings” è del 1994), torna a sorpresa il demone della vendetta che vive nei campi di zucche, ovvero Pumpkinhead. Quella di Pumpkinhead è una saga quasi sconosciuta in Italia, ma che gode di un buon seguito di fans negli States, tanto che il demone protagonista è già stato consacrato a boogeyman del cinema horror e vanta una discreta quantità di prodotti a lui dedicati (magliette, action figures, fumetti etc.). “Pumpkinhead 3 – Ceneri alle ceneri” si ricollega direttamente al primo capitolo diretto nel 1989 da Sran Winston e lo fa riprendendo alcuni personaggi che lì furono protagonisti e aggiornando la vicenda ai giorni nostri, mantenendo ovviamente centrale il tema della vendetta. In questo terzo capitolo vediamo agire un viscido profanatore di cadaveri, interpretato da un redivivo Doug Bradley (il Pinhead della saga “Hellraiser”), e la sua sgradevole banda, della quale fa parte anche Bunt Wallance (Douglas Roberts), uno dei personaggi già comparsi nel primo film e che conosce già bene Pupkinhead e le sue modalità d’azione. Il film abbonda in scene cruente e disgustose, con una gran parata di cadaveri decomposti e qualche scena sanguinolenta che in questo tipo di film non guasta mai; gli effetti speciali artigianali e di make-up sono di buona fattura, molto meno i – fortunatamente – rari effetti in computer graphic che risultano del tutto finti. Il mostro, seppure poco originale nella resa estetica, è piuttosto efficace e la sua resa old style non può che far tenerezza all’horrorofilo incallito, così come una genuina aria da vecchio b-movie si può respirare durante tutta la pellicola, nei pregi e nei suoi difetti. Di difetti, comunque, “Pumpkinhead 3” ne è colmo, a partire da una sceneggiatura spesso approssimativa e piena di buchi e ingenuità, per non parlare dei personaggi bidimensionali che fungono da semplice contorno per giustificare le azioni del demone della vendetta; lo stesso Pumpkinhead, poi, non sembra molto coerente con la sua natura: il suo compito è eliminare coloro che hanno compiuto il torto a chi lo ha invocato, eppure, di tanto in tanto, il mostro uccide anche altre persone…così, senza nessuna logica. Tutti questi difetti, comunque, non fanno altro che esaltare il carattere exploitativo da b-movie di cui volutamente “Pumpkinhead 3” si fa portatore. La sobria regia è di Jake West, già regista dello splatter a basso budget “Evil Aliens”. Nel cast compare anche Lance Henriksen, già protagonista del primo film. Nulla di trascendentale, ma si lascia guardare con divertimento. Segue un quarto episodio nel 2007 con “Pumpkinhead:Blood Feud”. Merita mezzo voto in più.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Commenti

Commenti (0)

RECENSIONI DALLA COMMUNITY (3)

Gimly

Gimly

4 /10

Perhaps a better sequel than Blood Wings, but still not a good movie. Those who are invested enough in practical effects might enjoy the return of the titular creature itself, but if you're looking for success in plot, acting, direction, etc. then seek it elsewhere.

Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product.

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

3 /10

A lukewarm and unmemorable resurrection for a horror monster who spent too much time asleep.

It's been many years since Pumpkinhead 2, a movie that virtually ruined any prospects for short-term continuity, with a frankly weak story. The introduction of new technical resources, such as CGI and others, allowed this to be rethought and eventually led to the production of this film, which largely ignores its immediate predecessor and seems to be trying to be a continuation of the initial film, from 1988.

The film takes place in a rural American area where the Pumpkinhead is a legendary creature that some believe. The creature will be awakened to kill the owners of a local crematorium, after it becomes public that they were also heads of an organ trafficking business made at the expense of the locals' corpses, which were not cremated, as previously thought, but abandoned there, rotting in muddy ponds or in a half-abandoned tool shed. What follows is a bath of blood and mutilated bodies, in which the dialogue is poorly written, the situations are quite cliché and the lack of logic reigns. Indeed, how could all those bodies be there without there being, all around, the smell of a nauseating and incriminating corpse? If just one corpse exhales a terrible odor, dozens make a place, even outdoors, unbearable.

In addition to the script flaws, the film is also not particularly happy in the performance of its cast. Almost all the actors stand out for their exaggeration, for their bizarre way of acting, for their surreal or histrionic ways or even for an erasure that almost seems to ask to be taken out of there. The exceptions to this truly embarrassing panorama are veterans Doug Bradley and Lance Henrikssen. Bradley was very convincing and competent in the role of the doctor, the film's true villain, and his performance was only marred by a costume that looks recycled from a spaghetti western. Henrikssen, for his part, returns to the films that made him minimally famous, again in the shoes of Ed Harley, the protagonist of the first film.

Technically, it's clearly a cheap movie and in which money doesn't abound. Even so, the film manages to fulfill the minimum prerequisites. It never truly scares us, but gore connoisseurs will find some carnage enjoyable. Cinematography is not the film's strong point, the filming work feels quite amateurish at times and there are clearly ill-framed scenes. The editing is mediocre, the effects are acceptable but not particularly brilliant, and the costumes are decent enough. The best are the sets, even though some of those houses are too European for a movie that wants to be set in the USA.

Wuchak

Wuchak

7 /10

Vengeful yokels summon Pumpkinhead against an organ harvesting ring

After a long dozen years since “Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings,” the third film in the series finally manifested in 2006. Like the prior movie, it wasn’t theatrically released, but rather debuted on the Sci Fi channel (now SyFy) before its release to video five months later. The next film in the series, “Blood Feud,” came out on Sci Fi a mere 3½ months later in early 2007.

The differences in the nature of release don’t matter much when you consider how the initial theatrically released film didn’t have a blockbuster budget. It only cost $3.5 million while this one cost close to $6 million. If you factor in inflation over the course of 18 years we’re talking about roughly the same amount of money to produce.

The biggest difference between “Ashes to Ashes” and “Blood Feud” and the first two movies in the series is that they were shot in rural Romania as opposed to the backwoods of SoCal (Topanga Canyon and Santa Clarita respectively). But this doesn’t make much difference since the location of the story could basically be anywhere in the backwaters of America, not necessarily SoCal. For instance, the mediocre fourth installment features a feud reminiscent of the Hatfields and McCoys, which took place in Appalachia.

My favorite in the series is probably the second one, “Blood Wings,” simply because the story is more compelling than the original movie, plus the production featured a superior female cast (Soleil Moon Frye and Ami Dolenz). I rank this one after “II” and maybe even on par. While the storytelling could’ve been less convoluted, I commend the filmmakers for respecting the intelligence of the viewer to put the pieces of the puzzle together (which isn’t that difficult, if you think about it).

Furthermore, the southeastern Europe locations add a certain ambiance lacking in the first two movies. Transylvania happened to be less than 3 hours’ drive to the north/northwest. Consider the mortician’s peculiar manor; you’re not going to see anything like this in SoCal.

Speaking of the mortician, he’s played by Doug Bradley, aka Pinhead. Meanwhile Lance Henriksen returns as Ed Harley, albeit a ghostly figure, not to mention the character Bunt also returns (just played by a different actor). In the feminine department, raven-haired Ioana Ginghina is a highlight as Ellie Johnson with Lisa McAllister being worth a mention as Goth girl Dahlia.

It runs 1h 34m and was shot in 2006 at Castel Film Studios, which is north of Bucharest in southeast Romania.

GRADE: B-/B

Recensioni fornite da TMDB