Halloween backdrop
Halloween poster

HALLOWEEN

2007 US HMDB
August 31, 2007

The early years of young Michael Myers and the events leading up to his fateful Halloween night murder rampage in the quiet town of Haddonfield, Illinois.

Directors

Cast

👍 1 👎 🔥 🧻 👑 (1)

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Andy Gould (Producer)Malek Akkad (Producer)Harvey Weinstein (Executive Producer)Bob Weinstein (Executive Producer)Matthew Stein (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Rob Zombie (Screenplay)
Music: Tyler Bates (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Phil Parmet (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Little Michael Myers spends his days killing lab animals and photographing carcasses of dogs and cats picked up from the streets. The childhood of the little misfit passes at the mercy of a drunk and violent stepfather, a cruel indifferent sister, and a stripper mother who is definitely absent. On Halloween night, Michael grabs a kitchen knife and wipes out the entire family, leaving only his little sister Boo alive. The boy is taken to a psychiatric hospital, where he remains locked up for over 15 years, until, during a transfer on Halloween night, Michael kills the guards escorting him and escapes to the town, where he begins hunting Laurie Strode, a teenager preparing to spend All Hallows' Eve as a babysitter at the Doyle house. "This is a new 'Halloween.' Call it a remake, update, reimagining, or whatever you like, but the sure thing is that it is a new beginning, completely detached from the saga. This is what interested me about the project." With these words, director Rob Zombie presented his 'Halloween' at the press conference preceding the film's release, and in these words lies the real key to reading 'Halloween – The Beginning.' The brilliant director of 'House of 1000 Corpses' and 'The Devil's Rejects' is clearly a sincere fan of 1970s genre cinema and has demonstrated this with his two previous feature films and his participation in the 'Grindhouse' project. Therefore, reinventing a classic of the seventies like 'Halloween' must have been a great honor for him, as well as a huge responsibility. The film with which John Carpenter in 1978 revolutionized the way of making fear in cinema, in addition to being a classic, is a true masterpiece of suspense and is still a very current technical and stylistic manual of the genre. Therefore, comparing it with Zombie's film would be like embarking on an uncomfortable massacre game to the detriment of the second, which lacks everything that made the 1978 progenitor unique. Nevertheless, Zombie's courage in accepting this challenge and his personal angle with which to frame the entire story are appreciated. As Zombie himself stated, 'Halloween – The Beginning' is indeed a new starting point for the saga, a restart that is not and does not want to be a remake of Carpenter's film, but simply the same story told in a completely different way and with elements absent in the first film. Someone called it a newquel, but it is a singular approach to a film that horror fans probably know by heart, a rewrite from scratch of one of the greatest icons of postmodern horror. Zombie decides to delve into the childhood of the 'monster' and clearly show the audience the reasons that led him to violence and murder, developing a nihilistic and disturbingly current vision of the social condition of some 'edge' suburban realities. Rob Zombie's Michael Myers has nothing supernatural about him; he does not possess that aura of pure and intangible malice that characterized the Michael Myers developed from John Carpenter's mind. The new Michael Myers is a real and realistic 'monster,' a product of the sick society that raised him and poisoned him with massive doses of violence, vulgarity, pornography, and sadism incitement. Michael is the direct reflection of the environment in which he grew up: a lower-middle-class family living in questionable hygienic conditions and composed of unsavory characters. The verbally violent, alcoholic, and slimy stepfather is an histrionic and excessive William Forsythe (Sheriff Wydell of 'The Devil's Rejects'), who pronounces sexual fantasies about the adolescent stepdaughter and continually finds reasons to question Michael's virility; the older sister Judith (the Hanna Hall who played little Jenny in 'Forrest Gump') is a seductive and emancipated teenager who shatters the brother's dreams and secretly represents his sexual desires. Even the stripper mom, played by the always fascinating Sheri Moon, hides behind a worn mask of parental affection an evident educational incapacity and a persistent physical and mental absence. In such a climate of degrading family dysfunction, where the only anchor of affection for Michael seems to be represented by the newborn sister Boo, to whom the boy devotes the most loving care, the ground is paved for a latent psychopathy that is all ready to explode. Zombie weaves the entire situation with a wealth of details and measured narrative care, yet the long prologue that anticipates the killer's internment in the Smith's Grove Sanitarium seems to lack something, namely that spark that separates the monster from the child. Someone might venture that there is no division between the two faces of the same coin, but since Zombie seems so inclined to sociological analysis and showing the psycho-pedagogical formation of the serial killer, one would have expected a deeper exploration of that 'quid' that triggers the transformation from child Michael Myers to monster Michael Myers. Probably the reason for some lack in this regard is due to the need to tell the complex genesis of a distorted personality in about 40 minutes, and the same need is evident in the haste with which the remaining 70 minutes are carried out. The big problem with 'Halloween – The Beginning' is indeed the desire to contain in less than 2 hours a story that is decidedly complex and rich in events, a prequel and a remake, two films in one. After Michael's escape from the psychiatric hospital, there is the need to tell in the little remaining time what Carpenter had comfortably done in over 90 minutes, and so the race begins. The film becomes frenetic, a succession of (short) stakeouts and murders, all a bit too standardized to the modern style of post-'Scream' slasher movies. We thus have a trio of friends among whom none stands out, neither for charisma nor for acting skills, the Laurie Strode of Scout Taylor-Compton (Zombies – The Revenge of the Innocent), a teenager certainly prettier than Jamie Lee Curtis from the first film, but less suited to represent the virginal and androgynous nemesis of Michael. Laurie's friends, who perform skits that curiously link them to the foul-mouthed protagonists of Tarantino's 'Death Proof,' are played by Kistina Klebe (Lynda) and Danielle Harris (Annie), who even returns for the third time to confront Michael Myers, since in the 1980s she played Jamie Lloyd, the serial killer's grandniece. The last, hectic, 20 minutes of 'Halloween – The Beginning' return to represent a novelty compared to the original plot, resulting, moreover, definitely excellent. Everything is tinged with smashing action, but it is here that the new, gigantic Michael Myers truly emerges, an unstoppable giant, although completely human, capable of feeling an ambiguous sense of love/hate for his sister (the photography scene is definitely touching) and demonstrating all his ferocity as a true contemporary boogeyman. The hysterical finale, which partially pays homage to Hooper's 'The Texas Chain Saw Massacre' and partially to Craven's 'The Hills Have Eyes,' has an emotional and visual power definitely worthy of the best Rob Zombie. A Rob Zombie who, unfortunately, does not always emerge in this 'Halloween – The Beginning,' a bit too far from the freak poetics of the director and closer to the modern slasher movie. The zombie genius especially emerges in the desire to focus the viewer's attention on the monster rather than the victim, as well as in some over-the-top dialogues and the choice of a cast to be included in the Guinness Book of Records for the largest number of genre character actors within the same film; yet the entire operation lacks the anarchic genuineness that filled the director's two previous feature films, so much so that one might hypothesize too tight supervision by the Weinstein brothers over the entire conduct of the project. As of today, 'Halloween – The Beginning' is the weakest film in Rob Zombie's still brief career, although it certainly represents one of the most successful chapters in the saga inaugurated by Carpenter's masterpiece. A film that will surely divide the fans of the rocker-director and of Carpenter's 'Halloween,' a film that could have offered more.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Stream

Lionsgate+ Amazon Channels Lionsgate+ Amazon Channels

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

Buy

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (5)

tmdb17996075

4 /10

I don't have a problem with remakes per se. Even though I am not a big fan of the original "Halloween" film directed by John Carpenter, I do acknowledge it as a film that started a horror slasher trend and served as an inspiration for many of the films that came after it. Since I am not crazy about the 1978 film, I thought I would be able to enjoy this remake without being too influenced by my love for the original film. After seeing this remake, I started to appreciate the original version a little bit more, since Rob Zombie turned the story and its characters into a vulgar mess.

The original film mostly focuses on the life of Laurie Strode going on about her business and interacting with her friends for the most part, while we see the mysterious Michael Myers stalking her, appearing from out of nowhere, and we never really get to know why (without taking the sequels into account). In this remake, Rob Zombie attempts to explore little Michael Myers' psychology, giving our villain a soul and establishing the roots of his evilness, taking away all the mystery and darkness surrounding the character. The results are not good by any means and the only thing it proves, is that sometimes, mystery is scarier and more disturbing than having everything explained, especially if the explanation is as predictable as "he was raised in a bad environment". The audience doesn't want to be spoon fed and I think it's clear that one of the main reasons why the original villain was scary, it's because Michael Myers remained as an enigmatic character from the beginning until the end. In the original film, Myers appears to come from a seemingly normal family, but for some reason, he turns out a merciless killer anyway. While the original "Halloween" film is not my favorite, as I established before, I do give the film credit for giving us a villain that no one could ever sympathize with. This film basically tries to portrait Michael as a poor little thing who was poorly raised and eliminates any possibility of seeing him as a genuinely dark and fear-provoking character. This overexposure of Michael's early years lasts about 40 minutes, which gets tedious, it makes the villain more pitiful than frightening and in the end, they don't really manage to establish a point about his insanity all that well either.

Once again, Rob Zombie casts his wife, Sheri Moon Zombie, who was great in 'House of 1000', playing a Insane, trashy girl… but why did she have to play almost the exact same character here? I don't know what's the deal with Rob Zombie having the need to show us his wife stripping and being sexy all the time, maybe it's some kind of fetish they have and it's all good... but 'Halloween' was not the right choice to show Sherri Moon dancing and showing her body again. Another thing that Rob Zombie seems to borrow from his film "House of 1000 Corpses" is the fact that the characters are swearing most of the times and while I have nothing against foul language whatsoever, but I think it sounds repetitive and silly when we hear the f-word every 5 seconds. The amount of stupid lines that could be easily compared to some of the crappiest PG-rated films that came out throughout the last years.

I'm really disappointed. I didn't think I was going to hate it so much, but I do and it's a shame because I really wanted to like this film. Better luck next time, I guess. My noble advice for all fans of the original 'Halloween' movie is: Don't watch this remake if you're sensitive, because this hurts a lot. I know I felt cheated, even if I'm not a fan of Carpenter's version either.

Gimly

Gimly

7 /10

The film’s first act is simply a huge version of the 1978 classic’s opening scene; following Michael Myers as a child through his first murder(s). Though many people found this tedious and far too drawn-out, personally I relished the opportunity to get more than a half a minute of character-development on the antagonist. In fact, we don’t only get to see Michael growing up and being arrested, the film then goes on to show us his evolution in a mental asylum. Once again, I know that was less than appreciated by quite a number of people who saw the film, but I find the sequence fascinating every time I watch the movie. Things like the relevance of the mask and kitchen knife are explored more deeply than the original, and the brutality of the character of Michael Myers is more striking. Though this is not considered good to hardcore fans of the silent bogeyman-characteristics from the original.

The protagonist of the piece is a character by the name of Laurie Strode, just as she is in the John Carpenter version, and she has two similar off-siders as the original (one of whom is portrayed by Danielle Harris of Halloween 4 & 5 fame). Where the film does not advance in comparison to its predecessor is the dialogue between these three characters. They use virtually identical language to that of the 1978 film, which felt outdated and artificial even then (I can only hope that this was an intentional throwback by Mr. Zombie).

The Ahab to Laurie Strode is Doctor Loomis, Michael Myers’ psychologist, acted by the consistently fantastic Malcolm McDowell. I believe it is his performance that makes me appreciate Rob Zombie’s remake so much. He steals every scene he is in with his overwhelming presence, particularly in the Zone 2 theatrical version of the film (which to my knowledge is unfortunately not available in Australia).

Final rating:★★★½ - I really liked it. Would strongly recommend you give it your time.

Dark Jedi

7 /10

The critics are wrong…again. Well, at least as far as I am concerned. This remake is not bad at all. A lot of people are comparing it with the original which is understandable. A lot of people says that it is crap compared to the original which is not understandable. At least not by me. This is one of the movies where I have seen the original and it was even one of my favorites at the time. I think this remake holds up quite well.

At first I was a bit worried that it was said to be a prequel. At least partly. However it is not really what I would call a prequel. It has a bit of extended background in the first quarter or so but that is not really what I would call a prequel. I think the movie was pretty much what I expected or perhaps I should say what I hoped for. It is a slasher-movie of course but it resists the temptation to go all overboard. Nowadays you do not really get scared or even shocked by these kinds of movies so I was not really expecting to be. I was just enjoying Michael’s rampage through the town. It is of course a bit scary in itself that you are watching a madman going on a killing spree through a small town and enjoying it but hey, it is all fake!

One problem with the extended background at the beginning of the movie is that now there is kind of a plot-hole that is a bit annoying. When and, more importantly, how did Michael turn from a deranged kid to a supernatural killer with the strength to carry away one ton worth of tombstone and survive being stabbed as well as shot at?

Apart from that I think this movie was not bad at all. Sometimes I actually felt that Michael was behaving a bit too human like when he was stumbling when crashing through walls etc. but on the whole I quite liked this movie. The style is different from the original for sure but I do not feel it is worse or better for that matter.

It is a bit surprising (well maybe not, the French are bizarre when it comes to scheduling movies and TV-shows) that Cine+ did not schedule this movie for actual Halloween instead of the crap they did show. This one would have been perfect then instead of a day after.

GenerationofSwine

GenerationofSwine

1 /10

Well it has Malcolm McDowell, and he delivers in the master of accents kind of way.

But....1 star for being a reboot, out of principal, especially a reboot of a slasher film that, well, I always thought the deal with those was to keep adding and adding until you have to look up the Roman Numerals in Encyclopedias to make sure you're numbering them right.

"Halloween MCMLXXVIII: This Time it's Easter," You know, that sort of thing.

But we will add one for Malcolm McDowell just because, yeah, he delivers.

So two stars: ** And then it seems like Zombies idea was to show a lot of nudity and especially a lot of naked women getting killed by a horrible male monster after committing the sin of fornication.

So three stars: *** And that is because he MIGHT--with a really big stretch on that--have been trying to do a satire thing of the slasher genre with all the naked murdered women.

But...he could have also been going for mainstream snuff porn.

I'm honestly not sure which way to go on this one...so We are back to two stars: ** Just because it really might not have been an attempt at satire and I sort of want to be sure.

And we can't add any more because well...

It was already made and when it came around in 1978 it was moody and atmospheric and, well, it really looked a lot like Halloween, only a nightmare version of it.

Zombie's remake feels more like a cheap version of Halloween and really, the outdoor shots that are supposed to give you the seasonal feel remind me more of Thanksgiving pick-up football games. They look and feel less like a nightmare version of Halloween than Season of the Witch's small Southern Town atmosphere.

And the horror parts, really, ANY slasher movie and, by the way, since when was Halloween about T&A? I thought Friday the 13th owned that stereotype and we went to Halloween for, you know, atmosphere and scares...at least in the first 2 films.

So really, I guess my point is that it has Malcolm McDowell and that is slightly redeeming. He's always fun to watch...even in his bad movies...like this one.

r96sk

r96sk

6 /10

I'm unmoved by this <em>'Halloween'</em> remake.

I guess that is of little surprise as I'm not someone who overly enjoys the 1978 original, I do like it but it is nought special to me personally. All in all, based on reading back my review of that aforementioned flick and based on my thoughts whilst watching, this is a weaker film in every way.

The only true positive I have is the Michael Myers theme, which is just a carry-over from the 1970s release - as ace as it is to hear it again, I would've preferred if they went without it... it kinda feels like they forced themselves to find spots to use it for the sake of using it. This production missed a Jamie Lee Curtis-esque performance, no-one stands out in that regard - Scout Taylor-Compton tries, but to no avail.

I never found Michael Myers himself all that scary or uncomforting in the original and that is again the case here, even to a further degree in all honesty. Myers just feels so brute-force all the time that there is no intrigue or creepiness about him here in my opinion. Malcolm McDowell didn't do anything for me as Loomis either, though it's cool to see Brad Dourif appear.

The opening 50 minutes and the closing 50 minutes felt like a bit of an abrupt switch too, admittedly I might have noticed something that doesn't exist but that's how it felt. It seemed early on like a noticeably different portrayal of <em>'Halloween'</em>, then the latter part felt more like a more standard, by the numbers remake.

If not for the name, this would be a very forgettable movie... in my eyes, anyway.

Reviews provided by TMDB