The Skin I Live In backdrop
The Skin I Live In poster

THE SKIN I LIVE IN

La piel que habito

2011 ES HMDB
August 17, 2011

A brilliant plastic surgeon creates a synthetic skin that withstands any kind of damage. His guinea pig: a mysterious and volatile woman who holds the key to his obsession.

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Esther García (Producer)Agustín Almodóvar (Producer)
Screenplay: Pedro Almodóvar (Screenplay)
Music: Alberto Iglesias (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: José Luis Alcaine (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli
Robert Ledgard is a respected plastic surgeon who, since the death of his wife—who committed suicide after suffering burns in a car accident—has been searching for a formula for synthetic skin more resistant than normal. To do this, Robert needs a test subject, Vera, whom he keeps locked in a room in his clinic/home and on whom he has now completed the experiments, despite the ostracism from the scientific community. With the sole complicity of Marilia, the woman who raised him, Robert is undecided about how to behave towards his prisoner once the period of experimentation is over, until one day the intrusion of a man into Ledgard's home will change the situation forever. Many have hailed "La piel que habito" as the entry (albeit only tangential) of Pedro Almodóvar into the realms of thriller/horror. In reality, this statement should be taken with a grain of salt because, while it is true that the director of "Hable con ella" decides to tackle horror themes, inevitably bringing to mind stories of surgical madness like "Eyes Without a Face," "The Diabolical Dr. Satan," and "The Hand That Feeds the Dead," it is equally true that Almodóvar primarily makes a film in his own style. It may seem like a banal contradiction, but the Spanish director does not renounce his very personal signature even where it might have been a bit more appropriate to loosen the grip and be more flexible, in service of the genre. Therefore, "La piel que habito," in competition at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival, carries all the strengths and weaknesses of the films that bear the name of the director of "La mala educación." Starting from the novel by Thierry Jonquet "Tarantula" and freely adapting it together with his brother Agustin, Almodóvar creates a credible and complex figure of a mad doctor, as well as a complex and fascinating theme that moves the entire film. The thirst for knowledge and the desire to achieve scientific milestones are overwhelmed by the desire for revenge, the resentment for a private life that has gone awry, rich in disappointments and losses. Ledgard is a vengeful parent from rape & revenge before being a scientist and uses all his surgical expertise to carry out an incredible revenge that gradually turns into redemption for a sentimental life cut short. A scientist who turns into an avenger who in turn becomes a mad doctor from a B-movie that gradually turns into an irredeemable sentimental in search of a soulmate. Ledgard's character transformation is mirrored by the physical mutation of his victim, a being with an undefined and indefinite identity and nature that represents the crux of the story. The material available to Almodóvar is outstanding, but there is a certain tendency of the author to dampen every enhancement of the story at the moment of its main climaxes. The foray into melodrama is acceptable and perhaps even necessary, but the way the love story between Robert and Vera is handled is not credible and too sudden. In short, six years of imprisonment pass in which the victim hates the jailer and tries to escape in every way, then suddenly there is the acceptance by Vera, not only emotional but also of her new physical condition. It all seems too unnatural and unbelievable, so the ending appears to the viewer absolutely telegraphed precisely because of this poor management of the reactions and behaviors of the characters. Furthermore, the introduction of grotesque elements also works against the film. I refer in particular to the character of Tigre and the long scene in which he is the protagonist, a pivotal moment in the story, as a trigger for the situational change, but the insistence on the grotesque and unbelievable image of the aforementioned Tigre, as well as his annoying behavior, completely dampens the intensity of the situation. Another flaw of "La piel que habito" is the questionable management of the narrative order. Almodóvar decides to start from the center of the story, telling the viewer a seemingly difficult story. Then, at the minute mark, a very long flashback begins that explains what happened before, placing an important and almost successful plot twist. After the almost 40 minutes of flashback (which are undoubtedly the best part of the film), the story returns to the present (or rather, the future, since the film is set in 2012) for the predictable ending. Thus, the story appears disordered especially for the too long temporal blocks that almost lose the sense of time and tire the narrative fluidity. In this sense, the film would have certainly benefited if edited in chronological order, even if the plot twist would have been more difficult to manage. Excellent are the two leading actors, Antonio Banderas—who returns to work with Almodóvar 11 years after "Los abrazos rotos"—gives an excellent performance as a mad doctor, romantic and subdued but at the same time determined, and equally good and intense is Elena Anaya ("Public Enemy No. 1") in the role of Vera, even if the screenplay makes the too quick resignation and acceptance of the change of her character less credible. "La piel que habito" is Almodóvar in every way: elegant visual style, taste for interior decoration and costumes, foray into the theme of transsexuality, but also improbable family entanglements, propensity for melodrama "at all costs" and so on. If you like the cinema of the famous Spanish director, this film will certainly not disappoint you, but I think that if a subject of this kind had ended up in the hands of Cronenberg in the late 1980s and 1990s (that of "Dead Ringers" and "M. Butterfly," for example), "La piel que habito" would have been a film of quite another caliber.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Apple TV Apple TV
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision
Chili Chili

Buy

Amazon Video Amazon Video
Rakuten TV Rakuten TV
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
Timvision Timvision
Chili Chili

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (2)

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

6 /10

The film is good: it's tense, it's intense, it's shocking, it's dramatic, it's engaging... but it's also brutal and quite illogical if we think about the details.

As far as I remember, this was the first Pedro Almodóvar film I saw, and it was up to my expectations. I heard that he was a very visual director, that he wasn't afraid to show ugly things as they are, with realism and authenticity, and that he sometimes brought us complicated, ambitious stories. This movie is all of those. Honestly, even though it's not a kind of cinema that I particularly like (and I don't think I'm the only one who sometimes feels uncomfortable when realism and rawness are taken to the limit), I liked what I saw. However, there are several flaws, mainly in the story told. I'll talk about that later.

To make this film, Almodóvar called a very competent cast of Spanish actors, and it is really necessary for us to recognize that Spanish cinema is going through a very good phase, with a lot of quality and very talented people. Although we are used to seeing him making American films, Antonio Banderas is Spanish, and it's great to see him here, speaking in his mother tongue. He knows how to give his character a darkly restrained, cold, calculating and slightly psychotic look. Elena Anaya also leaves us with a very satisfactory work, even considering that she doesn't have the material and time for more. Jan Cornet and Marisa Paredes, in a frankly secondary position, provide adequate support to their colleagues.

On a technical level, the film also has some interesting points. Filmed mostly in the Galician region, a short distance from Portugal, it is not a tourist postcard, we are barely able to recognize the locations (I didn't). But this is secondary! The locations are good and well used, the sets are very good (especially the operating room, with all the medical apparatus and a very modern look) and the cinematography is really remarkable. Cleverly edited, it's well paced and time passes without we're noticing.

The screenplay is inspired by written material, but has been so overhauled by the director that it doesn't have much connection with the original source. It's something new, even if we can understand or guess where the inspiration for some details came from. We follow the saga of a surgeon, specializing in plastic and reconstructive surgery, to create synthetic skin that he can apply to burned or injured people. Of course, this stems from trauma – he lost his wife in a burning car, and more recently lost a daughter, who committed suicide. What happens is that, at a certain point, he starts to make increasingly morally questionable experiments, going so far as to kidnap a person. I don't want to say too much, the film has many twists and turns that make the script more complicated than usual, but I won't be being honest if I don't say that there are many details and twists that have no logic at all. They simply do not make sense, starting with the creation of synthetic skin: the reconstruction of a burned face is a medical problem that is still far from being solved, but everyone knows that the skin is a human organ that regenerates itself, under the conditions and right time. It may never be the same as it was. And I can't see how all of this is connected with any hypothetical sex change (I won't say more, watch the film... but knowing that it's a very grotesque story, so get the kids and grandparents out of the room).

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

8 /10

After losing his wife in a fire, accomplished surgeon "Ledgard" (Antonio Banderas) has been working for many years on a type of skin that can resists burns! After about a dozen of them, he might be on the cusp of a breakthrough - but just how has he managed to develop this groundbreaking fabric? We, watching, are not the only people suspicious and as his fellow scientists become more openly sceptical, we begin to discover a little more of just what he's been doing for all of these years and that's the kind of plot twist that really does make you cross your legs! This is another of those stories from Almodóvar that is really quite disturbing - but not in any kind of hysterical fashion; it's an almost perfect paced and increasingly menacing story that is gradually back-filled to powerful effect by an on-form Banderas who juggles obsession and neurosis compellingly. There's not a great slew of dialogue, just enough to keep the thing enthralling and I really did enjoy the last fifteen minutes. Not for the squeamish, I'd say - but a great watch.

Reviews provided by TMDB