Urban Legends: Bloody Mary backdrop
Urban Legends: Bloody Mary poster

URBAN LEGENDS: BLOODY MARY

2005 • US HMDB
July 19, 2005

On a prom-night dare, a trio of high school friends chant an incantation, unleashing an evil spirit from the past with deadly consequences.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Louis Phillips (Producer)Aaron Merrell (Producer)Scott Messer (Producer)Matt Bierman (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Dan Harris (Screenplay)Michael Dougherty (Screenplay)
Music: Scooter Pietsch (Original Music Composer)Jeff Rona (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Ian Fox (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli •
Salt Lake City, 1969. During a school dance, young Mary is attacked and killed by the captain of the football team. Since then, it is said that if someone pronounces her name three times, they will be able to invoke the spirit of the girl. More than thirty years later, Samantha, one evening, pronounces the fateful name three times and from that moment begins to relive, through flashbacks, the last moments of Mary's life; moreover, her schoolmates begin to die one after another following the methods of famous urban legends. 1998: Jamie Blanks directs, following the wave of the successful "Scream," "Urban Legend," a teen slasher movie - well-made and not lacking in funny ideas. Year 2001: "Urban Legend 2 - Final Cut" sees the light of day under the direction of John Ottman, a disappointing sequel that adds nothing to the previous film. Tired of repeating the classic slasher formula, the producers thought it best this time to change the cards in play for this third chapter and introduce a story that harks back to the recent trend of ghost movies with a vengeful ghost, very dear to the Asian style. However, this attempt to bring a breath of fresh air to the series has miserably failed. Produced for the home video market only, "Urban Legend 3" immerses us in a situation of déjà vu from the start: if you say "Bloody Mary" three times, Mary's ghost will materialize. Aware that this idea (urban legend?) had already been widely exploited in the "Candyman" saga, the screenwriters considered it appropriate to explicitly cite the beautiful film with the man with the hook several times, just to cover themselves. But the film slides into other situations that smell of déjà vu: overlooking the stereotypical characters (now routine for this type of films), fantastic deaths are staged that greatly resemble those of the "Final Destination" saga (the boy in the solarium above all), only to suddenly turn towards the tragic figure of the vengeful ghost who wants to be found and remembered ("The Ring" and "The Call" don't ring a bell?). The direction is by veteran Mary Lambert, who had given us a good performance with the two "Pet Sematary," but who here fails to keep the viewer's interest, mainly due to a confused and full-of-holes screenplay. The character of Mary as a ghost has been rendered in a very disappointing way, using makeup that greatly resembles a hybrid between Linda Blair in "The Exorcist" and Samara in the American "The Ring"; moreover, it was chosen to show her clearly in several moments with rather laughable results. The only positive note, as previously mentioned, are the death sequences, all built according to famous urban legends and with pleasant gore/splatter effects where required (the scene of the spiders coming out of the pustule on a girl's face with bloody consequences above all). In short, "Urban Legend 3" turns out to be a hodgepodge of situations picked here and there from recent horror cinema poorly cooked and that only relies on good special effects. It will surely be indigestible to many.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Where to Watch

Rent

Amazon Video Amazon Video

Buy

Amazon Video Amazon Video

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (1)

slayrrr666

7 /10

Reappearing at school after a prank, a teen begins to suspect that the exceptionally strange kills and incidents surrounding her classmates are tied into a local legend similar to her encounter and finds the ghost of the woman is responsible forcing her to stop it.

This here wasn’t all that bad of a sequel. One thing it has going for it is that this one really has a lot of fun playing with its supernatural overtones which allows for some great scenes in here. A lot of this is due to the supernatural haunting-based attacks that occur in here which are quite chilling when based on the method of kills utilized to get the point across. The main scene involved with this is the attack in the bedroom, where the pajama-clad victim pops a zit, giving birth to a multitude of supernatural spiders from the wound and crawling over the bloodied body in a disturbing visual as she cuts away at herself in a particularly brutal fashion scores wonderfully, the motel assault is really chilling realizing that someone’s in there and. Likewise, the few small indicators of the ghosts’ background are quite fun with the flashes of her buried in the school as well as her dream of it being locked in the chest and crawling out for it being just as creepy and chilling as the other main attacks. This is mainly due to the ghost itself which is quite chilling, appearing with some nice facial distortions, creepy eyes and the wounds across the face making it pretty imposing while the flash lighting and quick moments leave it with a fine overall villain. As well, the curse that comes into play is quite nice with the ongoing mystery about her rampage and forcing the fun of the cemetery finale all makes for some good times to help hold off the few flaws with it. The most obvious one is that the really big, brutal deaths aren’t based on urban legends and seem just thrown in for no real reason. The film’s gimmick is that the kills are based around urban legends, yet neither being repeatedly stabbed in the chest with a broken beer bottle or urinating on an electrified fence and being shocked are real urban legends which doesn’t have anything to do with anything making the whole purpose of the exercise quite fruitless. Another big flaw is that the film has a really convoluted opening. There's no reason for there to be as many different angles and ideas thrown in, making it overwritten and convoluted. There's way too much going on to really get a handle of it all, and it makes the beginning really hard to get into. The last really big flaw is the jerk-cutting done in the attack scenes. This happens quite often, where it flashes in a series of scenes so fast that it's impossible to tell what's going on for the intention of getting some creepy images in, but they just ruin it by going too fast. This happens during most of the scenes, and becomes distracting. A minor flaw is the thoroughly underwhelming hot-tub scene, but it isn't as bad as the other flaws.

Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, Brief Nudity and drug use.

Reviews provided by TMDB