Scream 7 backdrop
Scream 7 poster

SCREAM 7

2026 US HMDB
February 25, 2026

When a new Ghostface killer emerges in the quiet town where Sidney Prescott has built a new life, her darkest fears are realized as her daughter becomes the next target. Determined to protect her family, Sidney must face the horrors of her past to put an end to the bloodshed once and for all.

Cast

Comments

Crew

Production: Paul Neinstein (Producer)William Sherak (Producer)Cathy Konrad (Executive Producer)Gary Barber (Executive Producer)Kevin Williamson (Executive Producer)Marianne Maddalena (Executive Producer)Peter Oillataguerre (Executive Producer)Ron Lynch (Executive Producer)Neve Campbell (Executive Producer)Courteney Cox (Executive Producer)Matt Bettinelli-Olpin (Executive Producer)Chad Villella (Executive Producer)Tyler Gillett (Executive Producer)Chris Stone (Executive Producer)Ben Ormand (Executive Producer)Ben Fast (Executive Producer)
Screenplay: Guy Busick (Screenplay)James Vanderbilt (Story)
Music: Marco Beltrami (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Tim Ives (Director of Photography)Ramsey Nickell (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli

It has been 30 years since the student Casey Becker answered the phone, triggering the murderous madness of Ghostface. It was indeed 1996, and Scream hit theaters, revolutionizing the way horror-slasher cinema was perceived. However, in Italy, we had to wait until mid-1997, when the day-to-date cinema releases were still a distant goal for us to achieve. Wes Craven's work radically redefined the approach to horror cinema, with self-awareness and a good dose of (self) irony. Almost a critical essay on film that worked on multiple levels, while still maintaining an engaging story, well-characterized characters, and some chilling moments that have remained etched in the collective imagination. Scream is today, rightly, considered a masterpiece, one of those watershed works that mark a before and after. And as often happens in these cases, when the public's response is also positive, serialization waits around the corner. But with the Scream saga, especially for its metacinematographic value, the very existence of a slew of sequels has fueled its metafilmic work, continuing the analysis of the genre, capturing its nuances and the trends that the market itself rides. This has ensured that the overall quality level of the saga remained quite high, with chapters coherently linked to each other, following the growth—not only in age—of the characters, the audience, and the horror cinema market. And so we have arrived at Scream 7, exactly 30 years after that first scream, with a reinvention of the franchise that had previously led to shifting the focus away from the historical characters to give space to a new generation. Yet, the fact that Neve Campbell's Sidney Prescott was not present in the sixth film seemed to some a real betrayal of intent: she, the most representative final girl of the '90s, the honorary scream queen of the last decade of the century who sets aside the role of designated victim to plunge the survivor's knife into the monster's flesh. Sidney cannot let go, Sidney cannot live "tranquilly" her maturity as a wife and mother. Sidney must return! And so, after the requel, the legacy sequel, here we are back to the starting point: Sidney Prescott, now Sidney Evans, against Ghostface. Again. Having moved to Pine Grove, where she runs a café, Sidney has married the local sheriff Mark Evans and had three daughters with him, the eldest of whom, the teenager Tatum, has a decidedly conflictual relationship with her, like a true rebel. When Sidney's phone rings, an anonymous number appears on the display, and the cavernous voice of Ghostface threatens her once again: for the woman, a wound she thought had healed forever reopens. Someone has found her and wants to bring her back to the center of attention, primarily threatening her family, especially Tatum. Someone who seems to know her very well. After the departure of designated director Christopher Landon, which followed the controversial firing of Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega's self-removal, the initial plans for Scream 7 have radically changed with the need to rewrite the screenplay from scratch, completely altering the subject. And so, the decision was made to return to the origins with the entry of Kevin Williamson as director. Williamson, the very creator of the saga in the '90s alongside Wes Craven, the man who wrote the screenplay for the first iconic film and the second and fourth installments, but also the screenwriter of I Know What You Did Last Summer, The Faculty, Cursed, director of the small cult today forgotten Killing Mrs. Tingle, and creator of that generational phenomenon titled Dawson's Creek. In short, the right man to bring Sidney Prescott, the original final girl, back to the center of the story. Scream 7 opens with a (beautiful) sequence set in the house of Stu Macher, one of the two killers from the first film—also featured in Scream 3 (reconstructed in a film set) and the scene of the final massacre in Scream 5—here turned into a stylish bed & breakfast experience for true crime lovers. An opening that seems to be a declaration of intent: the destruction of the past, literally set on fire, the negation of the nostalgia effect itself. A paradox, given that a moment later we relive, like in a philological remake, one of the iconic scenes from the first Scream: same music, same shots, same dialogues. I won't deny that a shiver ran down my spine. And then she enters the scene, a stunning Neve Campbell, aka Sidney Prescott, whom we thought had finally retired to enjoy her "retirement" peacefully. But as Jamie Lee Curtis, aka Laurie Strode, teaches us, a final girl is forever. And it is precisely on this role that Scream 7 reflects, as it abandons its explicitly cinephile value (confined to the initial sequence and a few lines from Mindy Meeks-Martin) and gains an implicitly metacinematographic one. The focus of the entire story is Sidney Prescott, but not the ex-girlfriend of Woodsboro who survived multiple massacres and tries to rebuild her life—that is a purely narrative detail. Rather, we are talking about Sidney as an archetype, the primordial model from which to start to reach the stereotype. When in 1992 Carol Jeanne Clover coined the term "final girl" in the book Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, she unknowingly had Sidney Prescott in mind, who is nothing more than the evolution of the various Sally, Laurie, Alice, Nancy. Sidney is the redefinition of the archetype itself, the first final girl since this term has been part of popular culture. In Scream 7, the reflection becomes much more subtle than in the past, and Williamson plays on at least two levels: the more metaphorical one, which is an integral part of the franchise itself, and the surface one. The first, the "meta" one, is of such finesse and coherence that it deserves a bow, but it requires a predisposition of the viewer to analysis; the second is not up to it, although it shows a dignity that many other sequels and franchises can envy. Let's now focus on the more superficial level, namely the story and the mystery it builds. In some ways, Scream 7 is a very classic thriller/mystery, but in the postmodern sense of the term (forgive the oxymoronic paradox). That is, it does not build a whodunit à la Agatha Christie, there is no Poirot looking for logic in the characters' actions, but rather that brazenness of a certain Italian giallo of the '70s, where suggestion and plot twist prevailed over everything else. In this, it also differs from previous Screams, especially in the revelation of Ghostface's identity. And if you stop only at the surface of the film, this choice, the motive in particular, might even disappoint you precisely because it requires the superimposition of that more meta-narrative level discussed above. After all, they say it right in the film that the "simplest" solution would have been the admission of surrender. In short, Williamson and co-screenwriter Guy Busick have crafted a much more elaborate work than it might apparently seem. Let's talk about the characters. We already know Sidney Prescott, Gale Weathers, and the Chad and Mindy brothers; then there is a series of cameos by historical characters (dead), but we won't reveal the "how" and the "why"; finally, we have the new entries. Mostly inserted to fuel the pool of "victims" and "suspects" (among them the familiar faces of McKenna Grace, Asa German, and Joel McHale), with the exception of Tatum, Sidney's daughter played by Isabel May, a potential victim, a potential killer, but above all a daughter. Tatum is the new generation directly connected to the previous one, but not like Jill Roberts in Scream 4 or Sam Carpenter in Scream 5 and 6. The generational conflict is the one that can realistically exist between a daughter and a mother, where the latter wants to break the former's iron rules just for the sake of doing it, precisely because they are rules. But Tatum is not just a rebellious teenager, she is also a girl who feels too much distance from her mother, she misses the complicity she could have with a mother: very simply, she misses the story of her mother's adolescence. Because, as Sidney says, everyone knows her past thanks to films and books, but she tends to deny it, she would like to forget the trauma, a trauma that can instead paradoxically be useful for her daughter to face the present, her adolescence. It is very beautiful and profound the relationship they have created between Sidney and Tatum, and indeed the film itself focuses a lot on it, rightly, bringing forward a discussion about inheritance closely linked to the entire "meta" discussion addressed by the film. Last but not least, Ghostface. In Scream 7, we see a particularly sadistic Ghostface, who performs ambushes, chases, and fights with a clearly action-packed soul, but when he plans the murders, he goes all out, up to the climax of a killing that seems executed directly by Jason Voorhees in a chapter of Friday the 13th, so brutal and sensationalistic. When you see it, you will understand. So, Kevin Williamson has certainly done a good job, especially playing with the reading levels of Scream 7, avoiding with great skill all those pitfalls that this chapter could have offered on a silver platter; in fact, on a couple of occasions, he even manages to make us laugh. And arriving at the 7th chapter of such a beloved saga, it was not at all obvious to keep the quality high; even historical horror sagas, which Scream openly draws inspiration from, have not arrived "intact" to this number after the title.

Comments

RELATED NEWS (2)

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (6)

Manuel São Bento

3 /10

Full review: https://movieswetextedabout.com/scream-7-movie-review-the-disheartening-reality-of-a-sagas-first-true-failure/

Rating: D+

"Scream 7 reveals itself as a disappointing sequel in a saga that has never failed so evidently, demonstrating a glaring creative exhaustion. It’s an exercise in nostalgia that, by trying to criticize the dependency on the past through AI, ends up becoming a victim of its own lack of vision and originality. When the mask falls and the motives are revealed, what remains is only the image of a franchise that seems to be fighting against its own obsolescence without knowing how to truly reinvent itself. Without its ability to satirize the real world and shock through genuine creativity, this seventh chapter gets lost in its own references, forgetting that for a story to stay alive, it’s not enough to just replicate the echoes of what came before."

JPV852

JPV852

3 /10

By far the worst in the series and shockingly lazy, though I guess some of the kills were at least okay. But everything else was trash, I get that Neve Campbell and Courtney Cox (both served as executive producers) were there for the paycheck, and that's fine but you can see it on screen. Also, the inclusion of Mindy and Chad was utterly pointless and they looked like they didn't want to be there (wondering if they were contractually obligated); they weren't all that great characters to begin with and added absolutely nothing to the movie.

For her part Isabel May was fine as Sidney's daughter and Joel McHale had some okay I guess but, and this goes to the laziness, it was obvious they made basically no changes to the script when Patrick Dempsey (wisely) turned the role down.

But perhaps the most shocking thing is how bad the script was. Sure, Kevin Williamson was never an amazing writer save for the 1996 original Scream, but I thought the dialogue was so bad and the ultimate reveal was so dumb, with one being patently obvious and the other just laughable especially with the reveal of the haphazard motives.

Before this, it was a tie between Scream 3 and Scream 6 of the worst in the series, but this one puts both to shame. No amount of nostalgia could save this. I have absolutely zero desire to see it again and hope they just let the franchise die. 1.75/5

GenerationofSwine

GenerationofSwine

10 /10

Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're supposed to hate this because the left is boycotting it for.... reasons that make no real sense, but that's sort of the drill isn't it? If it ain't woke, review bomb it.

And, to some extent the hate is a bit justified, it's not much better than Scream 3, but it's not as bad as Scream VI which, let's be honest, was yet another political lecture pretending to be entertainment. And that lack of politics in 7, that is probably the cause of the hate and the boycott.

And it being about as good as Scream 3, well, when Scream 3 came out it SUCKED. But it's 2026, and in 2026 a movie like that is actually pretty pretty good in comparison to the absolute preachy lecturing gutter trash that has been nearly every movie for the past decade in a half.

So what do you get? A pretty basic by the numbers horror movie with a twist you see coming like most every other pretty basic by the numbers horror movie. But you just get a horror movie, and it's just made to entertain. And in the era of politically partisan shreiking in absolutely everything, that is sort of a breath of fresh air.

FinixFighter

6 /10

Too splatter in my opinion. The suspense level is quite good but the ending has been quite disappointing to me. It could have been much better.

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

6 /10

I had very low expectations for this, so maybe that’s why at times I was surprised to find it was quite good. Scary? Well no, not really, and of course “Ghostface” has all the nimble dexterity and immortality features of a baddie from a “Scooby Do” cartoon so you can guess that there are at least two of them operating in cahoots. Given that was all going to be pre-programmed from the start, I thought Kevin Williamson did just a little better than anticipated with this. The new target for our Munchian terror is “Tatum” (Isabel May), the teenage daughter of the now battle-hardened “Sidney” (Neve Campbell) and her police chief husband “Mark” (Joel McHale). “Sidney” gets a series of threatening video calls from “Stu Macher” (Matthew Lillard) promising vengeance on her and her family. Isn’t he meant to be dead? Well regardless, soon the body count is starting to mount up and nobody knows just who they can trust. From here on in the wheels don’t so much come off as follow an increasingly preposterous plot line that once again reminds me that if you are the boy(friend) in any of these movies, then you have no more chance of survival than the men in the red shirts did in an edition of “Star Trek”. “Gale” (Courtney Cox) shows up to offer an helping hand and some luring airtime, but adds little as we head to a denouement that is based on the least likely candidate from the few left standing as the entire town smoulders in it’s own wreckage. These films deliver what they say on the can, and if you approach this in the spirit of been there and seen that, then this is no worse than the average production-line horror enterprises that Blumhouse churn out each month and I think you can safely assume that there will be a “Scream Ate”.

RetroWill

5 /10

As someone whose obsession with horror began with the 1996 original, reviewing a Scream film feels like critiquing a part of my own history. It is, and likely always will be, my favourite horror franchise. But love requires honesty, and the truth is that Scream 7 is a pale imitation of the sharp, subversive slasher that defined a generation.

While Neve Campbell and Isabel May bring a grounded sincerity to the screen, the film around them feels fundamentally lost. The "meta" commentary, once the serie's greatest weapon, has become its Achille's heel, resulting in a narrative that feels more like a cynical digital experiment than a cinematic event. This is most apparent in the legacy cameos. While the "flatness" of these performances was clearly an intentional creative choice to sell the narrative, the result is a jarring lack of cinematic presence. It is a paradox where the actors deliver exactly what was asked of them - an imitation of life - but in doing so, the film robs these icons of their emotional weight, leaving them as hollow digital inserts rather than the homecoming events they should have been.

The treatment of the supporting cast is equally cynical. Gale Weathers presence feels entirely "phoned in", serving as little more than perfunctory fan service, while characters like Chad and Mindy are pulled back into the fray with nothing meaningful to do. They feel less like franchise survivors and more like targets being kept on life support simply for future instalments. There is a noticeable lack of emotional continuity here; having survived such equally immense trauma, the twins are reduced to "smiles, sunshine and comic relief" rather than being allowed any real reflection on their own losses. While perhaps not essential for a slasher, the film suffers from a lack of respectful nods to the wider surviving cast - the sudden absence of Sam, Tara, and Kirby for example is left as a jarring void that makes the world feel smaller and less lived-in.

Most frustrating is the film’s aggressive attempt to outrun its own shadow. In a move designed to spite long-standing fan theories, the narrative effectively torches the series most iconic location, severing the link to the Macher house and Woodsboro in a way that feels more spiteful than symbolic. In destroying its past, the film inadvertently destroys its soul, removing the very anchor that gave the franchise its gravity.

The greatest disappointment though lies in the movies lack of weight. A Scream movie is only as good as the shadow the killer casts, and this instalment offers nothing but hollow, "pound store" antagonists whose motives lack any tangible connection to the legacy they’re trying to dismantle.

Kevin Williamson’s return should have been a homecoming; instead, it feels like a total departure from the gritty, high-stakes tension of the original trilogy. While it remains an entertaining watch for the sake of the brand, the spark is gone. Wes would be disappointed.

If the franchise is to survive, it needs to stop looking at screens and start looking at its soul. It’s time for one final, explosive showdown to close the book - for Sidney’s sake, and for ours.

TL; DR: A soul-crushing departure from the franchise's roots that trades cinematic tension for digital gimmicks and "pound store" killers. Neve Campbell shines, but even she can’t save a script that treats legacy characters like disposable marketing tools.

Final Grade: C- (2.5/5 Stars)

Reviews provided by TMDB