Halloween II backdrop
Halloween II poster

HALLOWEEN II

2009 • US HMDB
August 28, 2009

Laurie Strode struggles to come to terms with her brother Michael's deadly return to Haddonfield, Illinois. Meanwhile, Michael prepares for another reunion with his sister.

Directors

Cast

👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

Crew

Production: Andrew G. La Marca (Executive Producer)Matthew Stein (Executive Producer)Andy Gould (Producer)Malek Akkad (Producer)Harvey Weinstein (Executive Producer)Bob Weinstein (Executive Producer)Mike Elliott (Producer)
Screenplay: Rob Zombie (Writer)
Music: Tyler Bates (Original Music Composer)
Cinematography: Brandon Trost (Director of Photography)

REVIEWS (1)

Roberto Giacomelli •
Laurie is found armed with a gun and covered in blood as she wanders the dark and deserted streets of Haddonfield. The girl is picked up by the police and hospitalized, and the same happens to Dr. Loomis and Annie Brackett, who are seriously injured. Michael Myers' body is transported to the morgue, but the ambulance carrying the killer is involved in an accident, and Michael wakes up from what was only apparent death. One year later. Laurie has moved in with her friend Annie and her father, Sheriff Brackett, but she is continuously tormented by nightmares in which she sees Michael. Meanwhile, Dr. Loomis has become a successful writer thanks to a book in which he recounts the behind-the-scenes story of the Myers case. But Michael returns to Haddonfield after a year of wandering and is ready to claim Laurie's life, his sister. Let's revisit some recent history. In 2007, Rob Zombie brings the iconic masked killer Michael Myers back to the screen in a prequel/remake of Carpenter's film. The singer/director's fans are divided: on one side, those enthusiastic about the restyling provided to the assassin, and on the other, those disappointed by seeing the eccentric director bent to the logic of the recent Hollywood market. Zombie achieves the highest box office ever seen by the saga with his "Halloween – The Beginning" (over $80 million worldwide), and despite the producers' requests, the director says he is absolutely against returning for a possible sequel. News soon denied, since Zombie agrees to direct "Halloween II" saying he cares about continuing his "own" creature rather than leaving it in the hands of others. The production of "Halloween II" begins immediately in December 2008 with a pre-production period of just two months, one month of filming, and then a rush in post-production for a release in American theaters in August. The production chain that involved "Halloween II" immediately makes one think of two things: contradiction and haste. The contradiction lies in the sudden change of mind the director had regarding his participation in the film, but we estimate Zombie for everything he represents and has done in his long career in the entertainment world, and if it were the lavish compensation to push him back into the arms of Michael Myers, we like to think that his desire to complete a story already begun is the true motivation. However, regarding the production haste from which "Halloween II" was born, there are no excuses: the film was made in a short time, and the result shows it very clearly. The film is a patchwork of confused and poorly assembled ideas that cancel each other out, and the screenplay's very approximate level only makes "Halloween II" a product that is difficult to save. Zombie started from the idea of transforming his Michael from a supernatural monster into a suburban psychopath, with a "realistic" genesis to his violence, and in this sequel, he tries to continue on this path. Michael eats, expresses his anger even verbally, seems to feel emotions, has a long beard like a hermit, in short, he is a human being in every respect. However, he survived a point-blank gunshot to the face, which is not explained at all (strange...), and his almost psychic contact with his sister has a supernatural quality. The tangibility of evil elaborated in the first film, therefore, has some unclear second thoughts here. Another new element is the interest in the world of psychoanalysis and dreams in general. Michael dreams awake of his mother, spectral and elegant like a fairy tale fairy, who urges him to reunite the family; moreover, he dreams of a white horse, which the director insists on making known with a caption at the beginning of the film that represents the desire for freedom and the impulse. Laurie also dreams, but if the killer's dream activity is paradoxically "angelic," hers is filled with horrible nightmares in which she is both the perpetrator and the victim of the atrocities of her brother and his family. The introduction of the dream element, beyond the ridiculous presence of the stallion and the too obvious reference to psychoanalytic theories on the unconscious, could have been an interesting element, also because it is unprecedented for the saga, but unfortunately, it was handled very poorly. The idea is of great approximation and superficiality, given the lack of real motivations that would link this dream element to the unity of the narration, as well as the frequency – too frequent – with which the director resorts to it, also tends to weigh down the development of the action. In the end, the numerous dream scenes appear simply as gratuitous demonstrations of Zombie's talent, who seems to have returned to the times when he directed the music videos of his songs, and the easiest way to bring back the always beautiful wife Sheri Moon. Unfortunately, these touches of poorly managed visionary talent, which nevertheless allow us to recognize the director of "The House of 1000 Corpses," are accompanied by a really disarming writing that aims at the subversion of the main characters and absolute narrative emptiness. The plot could be summarized with a simple body count, and, if it is true that "Halloween" was born and grew as a slasher, one could still aspire to greater narrative complexity, given also the considerable duration of almost two hours and the noble intentions of the author, rather than reducing everything to a simple alternation of dream scenes and killing sprees. The film often goes in circles, seeming almost like a sterile celebration of murder; in the long run, the mechanism tires, bores, and gives the impression that some killings are really superfluous (especially that of the hunters on the pickup truck, not to mention the long scene in the hospital). Another sore point, as anticipated, is the subversion – for the worse – of all the main characters. We appreciate Zombie's (also screenwriter) good intentions to change the cards on the table, but often the characterization appears either too approximate or completely unbelievable. We'll skip Michael Myers, who, although endowed with a new and really appreciable look, begins to resemble Jason in everything, and focus on Laurie Strode and Dr. Loomis. The former is described a bit superficially as a hysterical punk who shouts-gets angry-cries, completely lacking a connection to the background given by the previous film; she is almost another-Laurie, unreal and unbelievable, whose only point of interest is the ambiguous mental contact with her brother, although the idea has been widely used in chapters 4-5-6 of the original saga (it was the niece Jamie). Loomis, on the other hand, comes out as a completely new character (and he himself says so at the beginning of the film!), a bit of a dandy arriviste, bordering on the ridiculous, who can no longer be seen as the historical nemesis of the monster, given his own negative connotation. And we all know how every villain needs a counterpart, otherwise, the loss of effectiveness is just around the corner. If taken for individual scenes, therefore, "Halloween II" may present some points of interest, but its overall vision does not do justice to the saga of which it is a part nor to Rob Zombie himself, who with this film crafts his worst work to date. Fans of ultra-violence will still have something to enjoy.
👍 👎 🔥 🧻 👑

Comments

Comments (0)

COMMUNITY REVIEWS (6)

Gimly

Gimly

8 /10

Personally, I found Halloween II the darkest of any Rob Zombie movie, and certainly more menacing than any other Halloween film to date. It’s full of tortured, nasty, hateful, abhorrent, violent and crude characters, and that’s just the good guys! Mikey is back, in a big way. His look is a little different, but in a realistic “I’m-a-serial-murdering-insane-homeless-giant” kind of a way. And although the bleak, demoralising nature of the film made it painful to watch at times, I would say it was worth it overall. Featuring some strong acting, a surreal but accomplished script, an absolutely amazing soundtrack, and a totally absorbing storyline. I may be alone in thinking this, but to me, Halloween II is a worthy entry into one of the most successful horror franchises of all time.

Dark Jedi

1 /10

What happened? When I watched the 2007 remake I was quite happy that it was a decent enough work and gave it 7 stars out of 10. This one though? Well the reboot is effectively killed as far as I am concerned. If there are to be made another movie in this franchise there has to be another reboot. This one is just ruined.

The first 20 minutes or so was not too bad. Then it just went to hell. Rob Zombie must have been high on drugs when he wrote this crud. A god chunk of it is just some drug-induced psychedelic mess.

Debora Meyers is just a foul-mouthed brat who is so dislikable that you almost hope that Michael will get her. Dr. Loomis have been turned into a despicable asshole. Michael himself is mostly just a big dirty man who slashes people up.

Occasionally he shows some of the supernatural qualities he is supposed to have but most often not. And he grunts a lot, what the f…? The dialogue is non-existent if you remove the foul language. I am normally quite resistant towards foul language but not when the movie is filled with it just to cover up the lack of talent in the writer.

I think that I have not been so disappointed in a movie in a long time. This movie is utter trash and a disgrace to a franchise that is really one of my favorite horror ones.

I am going to think more than twice before I ever watch a movie by Rob Zombie again.

rspen46

2 /10

I see 2 reviews here on this one, one is an 8 star the other a 1 star, I've been watching Movies for over 50 years now, I absolutely love them, all types and Genres, I can sit down with my Wife or alone and watch any good Hallmark Movie or any good Horror Movie, I have favorites in all genres.

And I think I can give a good honest independent review on any type of Move, so obviously here with an 8 & 1 star reviews one of them is either 100% wrong and the other right or this move possibly falls somewhere in the middle at around a 5*.

I watched it for the 1st time last night, I like the original, it's not a great Movie but it's good and a decent sequel to the Original, Rob Zombie's Halloween remake of the Original was fairly good, 10x better than his second one.

I have to agree 100% with Peter's review here, the star is a Loud, Foul Mouthed, and extremely irritating and ignorant Character, she is also a terrible actress in this Movie unless you just want her for her screaming in y our face.

I like all the actors from other shows and Movies he throws in, some are wasted others are fairly good in their spots.

I also rate it a 1 STAR, I'm not against Foul language in a Movie, but it should be used in the right spots and times, in this one, they just throw the F-Bombs out there like it's a normal thing and it's not, even when I worked in a Factory with mostly Men that drank some before during and after work, they did not use foul language that often.

I could have raised my rating higher if that was not the case and if she was nothing more than a screamer, let her act a little, I agree with Peter's question, was Rob High when he filmed this, LOL!, the reviewer that rates it an 8 star is WAY OFF!, I'm sorry whomever you are, but the only thing you get right is, it is Rob's Darkest Movie yet, other than that, this MOVIE SUCKS!

DO NOT WASTE 1 MINUTE OF YOUR LIFE WATCHING IT, watch the 2nd one with Jamie Lee Curtis, it's pretty good and also number 3 it's not a bad one either and better than the reviews it got.

GenerationofSwine

GenerationofSwine

1 /10

Malcolm McDowell so 2 stars just like I did the first one: ** The nudity isn't as much, so maybe I was wrong, maybe he was going for satire in the first one and not snuff porn...or maybe he was told to tone it down with the rape and dead naked women...

...but there are still naked women that get murdered by the big scary male monster after committing a fundamentalist sin of one kind or another...

...so was it intended to be a satire of the genre or does it just get Zombie off? Still not sure.

And again, the atmosphere isn't there. The film has a feel to it that is almost grindhouse sleaze without being good enough to really achieve grindhouse sleaze.

It makes for an off putting after taste in your mouth.

And with all the nudity it still feels like its trying to be Friday the 13th more than it is a Halloween installment.

Yet again I ask "Why remake it?" And this time the answer I can come up with is, Zombie is a great musician...unfortunately he shouldn't quit his day job.

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

1 /10

Paying to see this is a waste of time and money.

I've seen the original franchise, but I confess that "Halloween" will never be a movie that I enjoy. It's simply not the style of horror I enjoy: "slasher" films are simply too "campy" and will probably scare only those whose fear is measured by the amount of fake blood used in the scene. However, Carpenter's films acquired, with some merit, the character of classics. None of the older sequels even deserve to be used as a benchmark. They are simply awful, and it was the Franciscan poverty of subsequent films that motivated Rob Zombie to take the franchise and start over from scratch. And if the first movie was bad, this one is worse.

The film wastes no time with introductions. Starting at the point where the predecessor ends, it immediately transports us to the action, with a lot of deaths of characters that we do not know, and with which we do not care. The film thus functions as a virtual meat mincer. The script is downright amateurish, and an excuse for a horror film based solely on gratuitous bloodshed.

The actors are pretty bad. Malcom McDowell, who is usually a very good actor if he is well directed, has one of the worst works of his career in this film: in addition to having almost no time to do anything, the little he does is terribly bad, and the character is very bad. and unhappy. Brad Dourif does what he can, but in all fairness, I can't rate his effort beyond merely satisfying. Even so, he is the best actor in the film. The rest of the cast is forgettable, or downright awful, and that includes the entirety of the female cast.

Technically, the film bets heavily on CGI and liters of fake blood. The director completely forgot that the audience tends to feel the film more if they really sympathize, or care, with some of the characters, and in particular with the protagonist. Instead, he offers us all the fake blood he could buy with his millionaire budget, and grotesque deaths. It's no more exciting or frightening than an expensive video game, but it must have brought in a nice bag of money for the main players...

r96sk

r96sk

5 /10

It's a bore!

I didn't anticipate much from 2009's <em>'Halloween II'</em> based on its predecessor and it turns out I was right to have done so. It's nae good! More of Brad Dourif is nice, though to be honest none of the cast members do anything to elevate this film up.

Not that I blame those onscreen, as it's all poorly cobbled together. The early hospital scene, starring Octavia Spencer and Richard Riehle (minorly) interestingly, showed some promise, but this flick quickly descends into a waste of 105 or so minutes; I zoned out a few times.

Reviews provided by TMDB